Words of Danny O'Bigbelly My idea of a good time

February 20, 2010

Julie and Julia, or whoever.

Filed under: General,Originally on Public Spectacle — DannyO @ 9:54 am

My mother gushed over this book. So, when I was stuck in an airport bookstore, stocking up on books to use as mind fodder to distract me during the hop between the coasts, and I chanced across a copy, I took the plunge. I wasn’t excited about the purchase, but felt guarded optimism that it would equate to several hours of relieved tedium. I could tell from a cursory examination that it passed two of my mandatory criteria, and put my faith in my mothers judgment for the third.

Just for the record, my criteria are:

1) The font is big and easy to read. My eyesight is not good.
2) It’s small–will fit in my pocket, will not strain my wrist holding.
3) The writing doesn’t make my flesh crawl.

Rarely has a book succeeded so well on criteria 1 and 2 and then fall flatter on its face on 3.

I should have known better than to trust the recommendation of my mother–after all, her track record of recommendations for things like Girls I Should Date is mixed. I should have also noticed the “Soon to be a major motion picture” on the cover–unless you’re Nick Hornby, this is usually an indication that something horrible is about to occur.

As far as I can tell, the author never actually follows any of the recipes; the book is a listing of all the corners she cuts because she doesn’t have the right tools, right ingredients, right husband, right friends, right parents, right apartment, right commute, right kitchen, right job, her cat is psychotic, and her truck is unreliable. So, Julie, why don’t you step away from the computer, clean up your life, and then come back and write about that? I mean, if I want to read about self-loathing people who create their own problems, refuse to face them, and dig themselves deeper and deeper into lameness and mediocrity via a failed and half-hearted obsession to achieve a completely arbitrary and meaningless goal, I don’t need to pay money for it. I can read about that sort of thing for free. I have web access.

To be fair, I gave up on page 150 and didn’t finish the book. It might have gotten better after that, but I didn’t stick around to find out. When the pilot said it was OK to use electronic devices, I put the book down and didn’t pick it up again. It lost out to “Firefly” reruns on my iPod. I can’t say much more than that. Maybe it got better at the end, unlike Firefly.

But lots and lots of people thought this book was pretty peachy. If you can explain this to me, I am your apt pupil.

February 6, 2010

It’s been a while

Filed under: General,Nonsense I've spouted — DannyO @ 7:36 pm

As some of you know, I conceived of the idea of writing something resembling a full-length novel last summer, and have been toying with it ever since.

My first ideas were based on the story of Princess Lu, as outlined elsewhere in this blog. There’s a tremendous amount of backstory to the few things I’ve actually taken trouble to write down, and I personally think that it’s all very interesting, but it exists almost entirely in my imagination. Unfortunately, the stories and bits of dialog that I have in my head often turn out to be like those wonderful pebbles that you find at the beach: they don’t look so wonderful after they’re taken out of their environment, dried out, and set out for display.

The parts that I wrote down were not very well “reviewed”, if I may use that term loosely, because they failed to hold anyone’s interest long enough to make it through the first ten pages, as far as I can tell. I ended the last installment on a cliff-hanger, and expected to hear from people eager to find out what happened next–how will Princess Lu escape from the perils she faces; alone, dismounted, most of her kit destroyed, nearly unarmed, hundreds of miles from the nearest settlement, with some large creature racing at her? Well, she’s apparently on her own, because nobody seems all that interested.

There’s also the story about Joe-who-doesn’t-get-tenure, but I decided that was too interesting and complicated to be done piecemeal.

There’s also the story about a large, built-in-desperation spacecraft sent on a mission to meet some aliens at a nearby star system. The interesting (if I may be so bold as to use that word) aspect of this story is that it takes place in the very near future, and therefore uses technology that we would, for the most part, be able to find down at CostCo and/or Electric Boat today. It takes years to get there, and stuff like that. No faster-than-light travel, no magical technology, or anything unreasonable. The problem with that story is that although I have a great middle and dynamite end, the beginning is missing. I don’t know how to get the story started.

Around Christmas I thought about writing about driving across the country (without actually making the trip, unfortunately). I settled on this idea and worked on it for a while. I was getting into some deep insights about what it means to be a person like me, living in a time like this. You know, the usual mid-life crisis sort of thing. I thought I was making progress, but two events derailed the entire process.

The first was that one of my friends is going through the process of trying to get his own novel published. He has a lot of experience with writing, and writes much better than I do. He has fans and followers. His blog has more readers in a day than mine has had since it started. (My only regular readers are Google and Bing, and a few other search engines I’ve never heard much about, as far as I can gather.) And yet, despite his experience with writing, his popularity, and his impressive determination and amount of energy he’s putting into getting published, he’s having a difficult time. He’s making progress, but it’s taken a long time already, and there’s no telling how long the rest of the process might take. It’s pretty clear that you can be a good, ambitious, and hard-working writer and still have a hell of a time getting a book published. That makes my prospects look pretty thin, because I trail far behind on each of these qualities. Therefore, I concluded, if I’m going to write a book, it better be because I think the process is fun and enjoyable. I should write for myself, not for a publisher who will never exist or an audience I’ll never reach.

The second event was that I got a copy of “Inherent Vice”, Pynchon’s latest, for Christmas.

Pynchon is an acquired taste, or perhaps a communicable disease. Many people find him too difficult to read, or his sense of humor too odd or offensive. I also find him difficult to read (I can’t get very far into “Mason & Dixon” and keep stalling out after the first book, or chapter, or section, or whatever the hell it is, of “Against the Day”) and it’s certainly a fact that there are no good people in Pynchon’s world. Everyone has a flaw, or two, or a dozen, and Pynchon pulls no punches. The cops are bad, the villains are prosperous, the heroes do a lot of drugs, engage in casual sex, drive under the influence, order disgusting things on their pizza, don’t exercise regularly, and never floss. I love it. It’s what Wodehouse might have written, if Wodehouse had grown up in post-war California and done a bunch of acid during the 60’s.

The reviews for “Inherent Vice” are a mixed bag. The most positive ones say something along the lines of “It’s not Pynchon at his best, but even so he’s a better ride than pretty much anyone else” and the negative ones say things like “another incomprehensible mish-mash from Pynchon.” Sam Anderson of the New York Times Review of Books, didn’t even bother to write a review of the book, but instead wrote a two-page essay outing himself as someone who never liked Pynchon and can’t understand why anyone else possibly could, half implying that Pynchon’s popularity is probably due to some sort of self-perpetuating academic hazing ritual that forces everyone serious about literature to endure the ordeal of reading Gravity’s Rainbow. (I kept waiting for the punch-line because the structure and rhythm of Anderson’s essay is almost a perfect, although perhaps unwitting, parody of the story of Pointsman and Mexico from Gravity’s Rainbow, but it never came.)

Personally, I don’t care whether any particular person likes Pynchon, and am not going to try to convince anyone to read his books. My only desire is that enough people continue to buy his books so that his publishers will continue to offer them to me. I enjoy Pynchon. He makes me laugh. That’s really all I want from a novel. I’m sure Anderson wouldn’t like Wodehouse either (he doesn’t like things that are overly lyrical, or when the characters have silly, made-up names, or when the plots rely too much on serendipity), but I will make careful note of his reviews in the future. If it turns out that he doesn’t hate every book written by a living author, then I’ll just buy the books he hates, and I will thank him for his guidance.

So reading “Inherent Vice” made me rethink my plans. If I’m going to write a novel, it’s not going to be serious. It’s not going to be dramatic. It’s going to be funny, the characters are going to have silly names, there will be more serendipity than average, and nothing will be resolved. It’ll be fun to read. Otherwise, it won’t be fun to write.

So, where to begin? I watched from a safe distance as my friend upload his novel onto authonomy.com, and decided that might be a good place to get my novel in front of new eyeballs, assuming I ever write anything. There are hundreds or perhaps thousands of novels there, with an active community of readers, and perhaps if I upload my work there someone will stumble across it. It’s as good a plan as any.

One restriction of authonomy.com is that work must be uploaded as a .doc file, or .rtf. Neither is a particularly attractive choice. My learned opinion of .doc is that life is far too short to ever use any editor that produces it, especially Word. My opinion of RTF is not much higher–even the people who wrote RTF in the first place consider it an abomination and a sin against formatting–but at least it is a documented and markup-based standard, sort of. What this means is that it’s conceivable for people to write translators from real markup languages (the sort of things that people actually use for typesetting and writing and things of that ilk) to RTF without losing all of the goodness. Some of the goodness must be sacrificed because RTF is not as rich and expressive as real editing software–the sort of thing people use to write books, not church newsletters and memos that go straight into the recycling bin–but some remains.

I found a translator that turns a format I like into RTF. It works sufficiently well to produce output compatible with authonomy, but it has one large flaw. It ignores my selection of fonts, and always uses Times Roman. Now, there are worse fonts than Times Roman, but those seriphs don’t look good on the screen, and the kerning is awkward. I want a font that is easy on the eyes.

So I wrote a program that changes the fonts in an RTF file to be what I want them to be. That’s the sort of thing I do. It’s no big deal. Sure, I could do it by opening the RTF file in some RTF editor, select all, select a new font, and then save, but that would be work. Too many steps. I’d get it wrong every once in a while; better to let the computer do the repetitive stuff.

The only question is what font to use? There are so many, and so many opinions. But in the end, one font stood out from all of the others.

My book will be in Palatino.

That’s right. My book will be in Palatino.

That’s as far as I’ve gotten.

The software is ready and the font face has been chosen. Now for the hard part.

January 31, 2010

The story of Q

Filed under: General,Nonsense I've spouted — DannyO @ 8:43 am

Far away, and yet nearby, in the peaceful burg of Heisen, there live a king and a queen. They have always lived there, and always shall.

As is the custom of the land, the queen wears a new dress to dinner every night, and that dress is never worn again. At the time that our story begins, it had become a ritual for the queen to walk to the lower town every morning, and buy a new dress at the one (and only) dress store in Heisen. The store sold many different styles of dresses, but they were always made from the same fabric, and were always the same color–a perfect grey, midway between white and black.

One day the owner and tailor of the dress shop decided to retire and leave his business to his identical twin sons. Although the brothers were the best of friends, and had no animosity toward each other, each desired to run his own shop, and so they agreed to split the dress shop in half to form two smaller dress shops. Out of respect to their father, or perhaps because of their long apprenticeship under his tutelage, they continued to sew and sell the same fashions as he had, and their work was as difficult to tell apart as they were. They therefore made one large change, to distinguish themselves: one son would make only black dresses, and the other would make only white.

The queen, not wanting to show favor unequally, announced that she would decide which shop she would patronize each day in a secret but completely fair manner. Neither son would know ahead of time which shop she would visit each day.

When the king learned of this, he was both gladdened and dismayed. He was happy because the queen would have more variety in her wardrobe, but he was slightly dismayed because he thought it fitting that his outfit should match that of the queen, and, because in contrast to the queen, it is customary for the king to wear the same outfit to dinner every evening. The king was not sure what to wear that would match both black and white, but after consultation with his ministers, he selected an outfit that he thought would look equally good with both pure white or pitch black, and issued an edict to announce his change in dinner-wear.

The next evening, the king was mildly surprised when the queen entered the dining room wearing a beautiful dress of grey, just as she had before the elder tailor had retired. He assumed that perhaps the queen had a backlog of several grey dresses that she had purchased but not yet worn, and gave it no more thought.

But the next day, the queen wore another grey dress, and then the next day yet another. And then things became even stranger: it appeared as though the grey dresses were changing in brightness. Some days they would be lighter than others, and other days darker. They seemed to be perfectly white or perfectly black (although on some days, her dress did seem to be close to one extreme or the other).

At first, the king thought that perhaps his eyes were playing tricks on him. His new outfits, which contained many colors and hues, did not contain any shades of grey, and therefore he could not simply compare the color of his own outfit to the color of the outfit worn by the queen, as he had been able to do in the past. But as time went on, the king became more and more convinced that the queen was wearing different shades of grey on different nights, and as he became more convinced, he became more and more curious about how this could happen.

The king wondered whether perhaps his perception of grey had changed. He had the royal portrait painter create a portrait of the queen every night at dinner for a week, and every night he compared the portrait to the queen sitting across from him and saw that they were identical, but when he compared the portraits from different nights, he saw that they were different. And thus he proved to himself that the queen was wearing different shades on different nights, and it wasn’t simply his imagination.

The king considered the possibility that he might have misunderstood the plans of the twin tailors, and so he paid each of them an unannounced visit one afternoon. In the first shop he visited, all of the outfits were pure white, and in the second, all were pure black. As the king visited each shop, he observed the work areas and store rooms of each, and saw only white or black material. Even the threads, buttons, backings, and linings were pure black or white. There was nothing grey in either store.

The king was even more curious now, and so he made a tour of the rest of the lower town, to see if there was another dress shop anywhere. He did not find any. Finally, he tried to visit the father of the two tailors, to see if perhaps he had continued to sew, secretly, for the queen, but discovered that the old tailor had moved to Florida immediately after retiring.

The king then consulted the postmaster and customhouse and discovered that only white and black materials had arrived in the berg since the retirement of the old tailor, and a quick scan of the storehouses, warehouses, and other stores in the berg did not reveal any caches of grey materials.

The king never imagined that the queen might be simply recycling old dresses that she had bought long ago (and pocketing the money the treasury provided to her to buy a new dress every day), because he knew that there were no dinner dresses in the queens closets, and he had great trust for the servant responsible for the disposal of each dinner dress after it had been worn once.

That evening, the queen wore another grey dress. Later that night, while the queen was changing into her rinou, the king examined her dress closely. It was clearly new, and it was clearly grey. The individual fibers themselves were grey, as were the buttons. The king had imagined that perhaps the grey has simply been an illusion created by a weave of black and white fibers or threads, but he could see that this was not the case. The dress was fundamentally grey. If it was composed of white and black materials, it was done in a way that the king could not detect, even though he had very good eyesight and was using those very fine eyes to view the dress through a very expensive microscope.

Later that night, the king asked the queen what method she used to decide which shop to visit each day, but she only laughed and told him that it was a secret. When he asked her to tell him which shop she had visited that day, she told him that she did not know. There was an aspect of her mysterious ritual for selecting which shop to visit each day that prevented her from even remembering exactly where she had purchased each dress. Because the tailors were so expert at their craft, she never tried on or even viewed the dresses at the store–when she arrived, her next dress was ready, in a gift-wrapped box, for her to pick up.

The king was burning with curiosity. He knew it would be a serious breach of protocol for him to ask the queen for more information, and it would probably be futile anyway. He wracked his brains thinking of a way he could discover which shop she visited each day without doing anything inappropriate.

The next morning, the king visited the tailors and told them that many of his dinner guests had been delighted with the dresses that the queen had worn, and wished to buy dresses of the same kind for themselves or their female relations. Some had even expressed a desire to wear a dress matching that of the queen that very evening. The king suggested that the two tailors post a sign on the outside of their stores each afternoon, saying from which shop the queen had bought a dress that morning. The brothers agreed.

The king also asked for an additional favor: the brothers would have to take down the signs every evening before they closed. This would ensure that the queen never saw one of the signs herself when she went shopping the following morning. He explained that the queen did not want anything to bias her decision each morning, although inwardly he was also hoping that she would not discover his round-about way learning where she was buying her dresses. The brothers agreed to this as well.

For the next several days, the king found a reason to wander down into the lower town every afternoon and observe the sign telling at which store the queen had shopped that morning. And for the next several days, the queen was always dressed for dinner in the darkest black, or the brightest white, as predicted by the sign, and never in grey.

One day the king was occupied all afternoon and did not go to the lower town. That night, the queen wore grey. The king made a pretext to excuse himself from dinner and sent his fastest rider down to the lower town to see what the signs outside the dress shops said, but they had already been taken down for the evening.

The next day, the queen made her trip to the lower town and returned with a gift-wrapped box, as usual. The king, claiming to be ill, spent the day in the private chambers he shared with the queen, while the queen went about her normal business of state. The king used this excuse to watch the box carefully all day. He was tempted to open the box, but knew that he could not do this without being detected because the box was wrapped in such a way that unwrapping it would destroy the box itself, and the king did not know how to create a replica box. Nevertheless, he was sure that when the queen dressed for dinner that evening, the dress she withdrew from the box was the same dress that had been inside the package all day and he was also certain that the box had contained exactly one dress. It was grey.

The next day, the king feigned illness again, and watched the box carefully once more. In the afternoon, saying that he felt somewhat better and wished to get some fresh air, he went for a walk in the lower town. He slipped the dress-box into his backpack before he left, so he would never lose track of it. In the lower town, the sign outside the tailors shops said that the queen had shopped at the shop that sold only white. The king returned to the castle and replaced the dress box where the queen had left it. That evening, the king watched the queen open the dress box, and the dress inside was white.

The king repeated this experiment several times. When he went to the lower town to see which tailor the queen had visited, the dress-box always turned out to contain a dress of the corresponding shade. When he did not, the dress might be any shade of grey, even though the dress had been placed in the dress-box before the king decided whether or not he would check the signs.

After some time, the king decided that he would simply learn to enjoy the many shades of grey, and accept the riddle as unsolvable.

And that’s all I remember about quantum interference. Sorry.

December 24, 2009

The sword and the standard

Filed under: General,Nonsense I've spouted — DannyO @ 7:06 am

There are many differences between the LotR books and the LotR movies. The differences between the LotR books and movies is greater than most movie adaptions. For example, I would say that Bernstein’s West Side Story is much more faithful to the letter and spirit of Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet than Peter Jackson’s vision of LotR is to Tolkien’s.

I could write a long essay about the disappointment I felt at the unnecessary simplifications and recasting of the books in order to make the movies appealing to the broadest possible audience–and eventually I probably will–but for today I will focus on the differences in the character of Aragorn and the concept of leadership in the two depictions. This is not one of the differences that I’ve heard critics mention, but I feel that it’s much more important than many of the differences that people (people such as myself) have whined about in the past. It’s not unusual for film adaptations to elide characters or compress events in order to squeeze an enormously complicated book into a movie that can be sat through without a bathroom break, but what happened here is that one of the central characters of the book has been changed in a fundamental way. And the change is not flattering to the viewer, or what it says about what we expect from our contemporary leaders.

One of the conceits of the LotR is that J.R.R. Tolkien presents it as a cleaned-up and lightly edited history, written not by himself, but as a sort of autobiography and history of the contemporary times by some of the characters in the story itself, who lived in times long lost to any other record. Their title for this book is different from the one chosen by the editors at Random House: the more wordy but infinitely more informative The Downfall of the Lord of the Rings and the Return of the King. The Lord of the Rings himself is a very minor character in the book–he doesn’t even have a speaking role–but the central story is his downfall, and the restoration of the monarchy (and things that go along with it, such as justice and the rule of law) to a major portion of Tolkien’s world of Middle Earth.

As one might guess, these two events are not unrelated, although either one would have made a wonderful story in and of itself. To explain their interconnection, however, requires some explanation of the back-story for the LotR.

For long ages, Sauron, the baddest of the bad guys during this age of Tolkein’s world (a fallen angel, to use the metaphor I used several blog entries ago when discussing the Balrog, but not quite Satan himself) has sought to rule the world. Treachery and deceit are his best weapons, although he also commands great military might. In an earlier age, he could still appear to be fair and good, and thus he tricked the greatest smiths and sorcerers of that day to help him create a set of rings, the so-called rings of power. The properties of these rings are not generally explained in much detail, but the general notion is that each ring enormously amplifies the characteristics and powers of its possessor.

Sauron distributed the rings among the rulers of the world, who were delighted to receive them. Even the wisest of the wise, who were aware of Sauron’s bad tendencies, accepted them, because they believed that in a pinch they could be used as weapons against him. But they were less than delighted to discover, in the fullness of time, that Sauron had a deck of aces up his sleeve. Working secretly, he had created a special ring whose sole purpose was to control the other rings, and through them, their possessors, their works, and eventually their very wills.

The elves immediately perceived Sauron’s intent. They used their rings cautiously and managed to wield the power of their rings in a limited way without falling into his snares. The dwarves were not as wise, but they proved very resistant to the lure of the rings and the power of the one. Their ability to defy the will of others was far greater than Sauron had understood, and for this reason their utility as slaves was negligible. Thus Sauron’s attempts to use the rings against the elves and dwarfs were not very effective.

Men, however, were perfect suckers. They did not comprehend their peril, and saw only the opportunity to increase their own power. In short order, many of the great houses of men were destroyed or subverted to serve Sauron’s purposes as their kings were reduced to monstrous wraiths, slaves to Sauron’s will.

But not all men were conquered in this way. The remnants of the great civilization of Numenor, which had apparently not been given a ring (perhaps because they had been among the chief agents of the downfall of Sauron’s previous attempt at world domination), were still very strong, and its heirs lived on in the kingdoms of Gondor and Arnor. When Sauron assailed Gondor in an attempt to destroy the last remaining men who could threaten him, Gondor appealed for help from Elves and Arnor, who formed the Last Alliance between men and elves. The union was stronger than Sauron had expected, and beat back his armies until he was besieged in his great fortress. War raged on the plains before the gates of the city for several years, but Sauron was unable to break the siege. In desperation, Sauron emerged to join the fight, and, after killing both the Gil-galad, high king of the Noldor, and Elendil, king of the remaining Numenorians, was defeated. Narsil, the sword of Elendil, is broken beneath Elendil as he falls, and its light is extinguished. Isildur, son of Elendil, cuts the ring from Sauron’s hand with the hilt shard of Narsil. So much of the will and power of Sauron had been invested in the ring that when it was cut from his hand his physical form was destroyed and his spirit fled from the world for a long time.

It’s worth pointing that only a weapon with fairly unique properties merits a name in Tolkien’s world; many great and legendary warriors make do with nameless weapons. But Narsil is a special, ancient weapon. It has a spirit of its own and, like other weapons of similar design, shines with an inner fire in the presence of an enemy–or, to be more accurate, in the presence of an enemy according to the judgment and design of its creators. (It’s wise to note that if you’re trying to use such a weapon, and it’s not shining furiously, then the weapon isn’t on your side in the fight, and you could be in a lot of trouble.)

There’s a bit of a power vacuum in Middle Earth: Sauron is fled from the world; the high king of the Noldor is dead, and there is nobody with the proper credentials to claim the title; Elendil is dead, and Isildur takes his place. And here’s where things take a bad turn. Isildur doesn’t destroy the ring, but instead he claims it for his own, thinking he can control it. He couldn’t be more wrong. Anyone who attempts to use the ring will be turned towards evil, and the more powerful the person is, the more likely it is that he will simply become Sauron’s successor.

Delving even farther into the back-story, it’s interesting to note that the house of Elendil was one of the few survivors of the ruin of the Numenor, the greatest civilization of Men the world had known, which was destroyed when the leaders of Numenor, goaded on by Sauron, challenged the gods in an attempt to gain immortality. The patience of the gods was at an end, and they responded by destroying, in the most literal sense, the entire continent on which Numenor lay. Sauron greatly feared the Numenorians, but he also knew how to use their own pride and power against them.

Isildur was old enough to witness that disaster, but survived because Elendil fled with his to the East instead of joining the assault on the undying lands to the West. He saw the result; he watched Numenor burn and then sink beneath the waves of the ocean forever. But he didn’t learn humility from it, and thus he is a perfect dupe for Sauron and the one ring.

But before Isildur has a chance to really foul things up, he and his party are ambushed by marauders in the wilderness. Isildur loses the ring during his attempt to flee, and is killed. The ring is lost, the Narsil is broken, the men of the west are left without a king, and the elves will never have another high king.

Don’t worry if you haven’t read the books or seen the movie; I haven’t spoiled anything for you. This is skimmed over lightly in the first two minutes of the movie.

Spoilers come now.

The Dunedain, the royalty of Arnor, had survived, and Isildur had a legitimate heir, although nobody knew of him. The shards of Narsil had been recovered as well. For many generations of men, both the knowledge of the lineage of the Dunedain and the shards of Narsil were the secret possessions of Elrond, a powerful elf leader. Aragorn is the direct heir of Isildur, and Elrond, believing that he has identified the proper leader at the proper moment, informs Aragorn of his true lineage and the identity of the shards of Narsil when Aragorn is somewhere in his forties.

The world will need a leader; Sauron has reestablished himself, and Middle Earth is threatened again. The books begin with the rediscovery of the ring, which has finally resurfaced. If Sauron regains the ring, his victory is certain. The opportunity to destroy the ring easily was squandered by Isildur; it is impervious to ordinary harm. The temptation to use the ring against Sauron is enormous, but worse than perilous. In the book, it is made clear that when Sauron becomes aware of Aragorn, he is deeply troubled at the possibility that Aragorn might acquire and wield the one ring–which is, after all, his heirloom–before Sauron can recover it, because Aragorn is one of the few people who might be able to control it, and as such Aragorn presents one of the few real existential threats that Sauron has ever had to face. The idea that Aragorn might not claim the ring instead does not occur to Sauron–it makes no sense to him, from his perspective, that anyone would throw away an opportunity to rule the world. In the end, Sauron is defeated in part because his strategy is aligned against the wrong threat: the real threat isn’t from someone who would wield the ring against him, but from someone able to simply reject the temptation to do so.

Will Aragorn be up to the task of leading the men of the world to defend themselves against this peril? This is one of the central questions of the book: what kind of man does Tolkien think might be up to the task? A different sort of man than Peter Jackson or millions of movie-goers, apparently.

When we first meet Aragorn in the book, he carries no martial weapon, but simply the tools of a hunter. He is a man long past his youth and who has had a very hard life. He is scarred and weathered. He has spent his adult life fighting a long retreat against the forces of evil that have been slowly but inexorably conquering his world, and he has suffered. He may be a king by rights, but he has no kingdom, no wealth, and no servants.

Aragorn is conspicuously absent from some of the battles in the book, unlike the movies, where he always seems to have a sword handy, and tends to resolve executive situations by lopping off a head or two. This is probably a good survival skill in the world portrayed by the movies, which have considerably more battles and fighting than the books. In the book, it’s quite clear that he is formidable in a fight, but he is not primarily a warrior. He is a leader, not a brawler. People who share his goals quickly trust him, like him, and eventually feel love and great loyalty to him. People who don’t share his goals learn to fear him–if they survive long enough. In the movies, Aragorn is always in the thick of things, leading all the charges, killing more than his share of enemies, providing a great spectacle. In the book, he is much less amusing, but infinitely more dangerous: he doesn’t need to kill all of his enemies personally because people are willing to lay down their lives to do so for him.

It is not long after Aragorn rejects the temptation of the ring that elven smiths reforge Narsil and rekindle its flame. Aragorn renames the sword Andruil, the Flame of the West, since the elves have considerably upgraded some aspects of the sword during its reconstruction. It is clear that the elves believe that Aragorn is worthy to claim his throne, should he prevail in the war against Sauron. But keep in mind that it’s not really up to them; the elves don’t choose the kings of men (nor vice versa). They do it because it’s their considered opinion that Aragorn is the right man for the job.

In the movies, the presentation of the newly-forged sword treated as a very big deal, and happens in a completely different time in the story than in the books, to heighten the dramatic effect and give Elrond a little more screen time. In the book, Aragorn has no sword and is essentially unarmed until he receives Andruil at the beginning of the second book, while in the movies, he isn’t presented the sword until what corresponds approximately to the beginning of the fourth book, after he’s killed some ridiculous number of enemy foot soldiers with nameless swords that he always seems to have on hand.

In the movies, Andruil is a talisman. There is no distinction between Narsil and Andruil (which in the book is essentially a new sword that nobody has seen before). When he shows Andruil to people, they recognize it as a sword out of legend, and it opens all sorts of doors. In the books, the sword is a symbol, but of war and conflict, not leadership.

Elrond also presents Aragorn with another symbol–a banner whose symbols link him to the glorious days of Numenor and the ancient but (by this time) nearly mythical alliances between the elves and men against the forces of evil. And the important thing is that when people see this standard, they don’t just think it’s bullshit. Unlike a sword, a banner doesn’t threaten. It is nothing more than a symbol, but it brings his allies hope. They believe that Aragorn is who he says he is, and they have faith in him.

In the movie, Aragorn accepts the sword like a forty-five year old man accepting the keys to his first shiny red corvette. In the books, Aragorn accepts the sword as a tremendous responsibility, and as a reminder both of his lineage, the horror of the previous war of the ring, and the failure and downfall of his ancestors.

At a crucial moment in the war, Aragorn is far from where he needs to be, and things are going badly almost everywhere. Sauron is no paper tiger, after all. When you’re fighting an enemy who can control volcanoes and the weather, you should expect some setbacks. Aragorn knows he needs to cover an impossible amount of ground to bring reinforcements to a besieged city, and he knows there are a lot of enemies and perils between him and his goal, including a haunted valley populated by the ghosts of an ancient army cursed to haunt the earth because they broke their oath to serve Isildur in the first war of the ring long ago.

In the movies, the sword impresses even the ghosts, who attack Aragorn but stop when they realize that he’s parrying their swords with Andruil, which they recognize as Narsil from lost ages in the past, and then they immediately decide to be his allies, in a turn of events that seems silly even compared to the other silly things in the movies.

In the books, events unfold much differently. Aragorn is not afraid of the ghosts because he is the one person in the entire world who can give them what they most desire: to rest in peace. They were cursed by Isildur for breaking their oath to service to the house of Elendil, and, as leader of that house, he can release them from their oath. And so Aragorn rides the paths of the dead and summons the king of the dead to meet with him–and the king of the dead comes. They could have effortlessly killed him and his company, but instead they come to talk.

Aragorn shows them his standard, tells them what he needs from them, and that he will hold their oath fulfilled when they do it, permitting their souls to depart from the world forever and have peace. And they believe him, and they assist him, and when they are finished, he keeps to his word and releases them. One has a sense that Aragorn could have asked much more of them (and in the movie, he does), but in the books he is not one to abuse loyalty or the bonds of an oath.

You will notice that I didn’t mention anything about a sword. The spirits of the dead don’t care much about swords, but the standard of Elendil got their attention.

Even with the ghosts lending a hand, Aragorn still has far to go, and so he leads his companions on a ride that lasts for several days, in “the greatest haste and weariness that any of them had ever known … and his will held them to it.” That’s what a leader is to Tolkien–someone who can make you do more than you thought possible, without threats or menace, and with his sword in his sheath the whole time. This journey is absent from the movies, where geography is rearranged to provide Aragorn with a short and painless trip. In the movie, heroics are performed on the battlefield, while in the books, heroism can consist of simple things like riding non-stop over difficult country for several days into the face of the enemy, instead of turning aside or choosing an easier, less perilous path.

To Tolkien, leadership is also not asking more than your followers can give, and understanding that weakness is as real as strength. When Aragorn leads an army on what is deservedly believed to be a suicide mission across the frontier of Sauron’s realm of Mordor, where Sauron has tortured and poisoned the very land itself, some of his soldiers panic at what they see and cannot go on, “… Aragorn looked at them, and there was pity in his eyes rather than wrath, for these were young men … to them Mordor had been from childhood a name of evil, and yet unreal, a legend that had no part in their simple life; and now they walked like men in a hideous dream made true, and they understood not this war nor why fate should lead them to such a pass.” Aragorn offers them a chance to keep their honor by undertaking a different task; instead of continuing with the assault, they may turn away and attack foes gathering behind them–battle nonetheless, but battle in the green, living lands. “Then some being shamed by his mercy overcame their fear and went on, and the others took new hope, hearing of a manful deed within their measure that they could turn to, and they departed.”

And finally, when Aragorn’s army is surrounded “by forces ten times and more than ten times its match” before even passing the first defenses of Mordor, and Sauron sends his emissary to discuss the terms of Aragorn’s surrender, there is yet another fundamental difference between the movie and the book, and the behavior we might expect from a leader. In the movie, Aragorn responds to the terms by impulsively lopping off the head of Sauron’s emissary. In the book, Aragorn’s response is silence, but gives the emissary a look that conveys such defiance and force of will that the emissary cannot meet his gaze. Knowing the hopelessness of their situation, the emissary expects the army to surrender–by mutiny, if necessary–but the reception he receives is unexpected and perhaps beyond his comprehension. Sauron drives an army of slaves before him via force and fear, while Aragorn leads an army of free men that follow him out of loyalty, duty, and a common cause in the defense of their families and their way of life. The Aragorn of the movies is the kind of commander with which the emissary is very familiar, but the Aragorn from the book is something else, and something much more dangerous.

December 14, 2009

Hawaiian impressions

Filed under: General — DannyO @ 8:09 am

I don’t like sitting on a plane for thirteen hours very much.

* * *

The Hawaiian/Polynesian/whatever-it-is accent baffles me.  When the announcer at the airport told us the name of the carousel at which our baggage could be retrieved, I couldn’t tell whether she had said ‘G’ or ‘J’.  Even when she said it several more times.  Fortunately, other people did not have this problem.  I followed them.

* * *

They comb the beaches here in the morning.  They would probably say they were raking them, but the rakes are quite fine.

* * *

On my way to breakfast, noticed a statue of a cherub playing in a fountain with what appeared to be a kookaburra perched on its head.  It was dark, so I couldn’t see the details, and in any case, I didn’t give the statue much thought until I returned that way after eating and the kookaburra was gone.

* * *

Hawaiian beaches don’t have much in the way of pebbles or shells.  They have fragments of light, pumic-like volcanic rock that don’t wear smooth, and coral, which doesn’t age well at all.  It is pointless to try to skip these stones (it took me five minutes to find a stone that I could get even three hops from).  I guess that’s why people surf here–there’s nothing else to do at the beach.

* * *

Diamond Head looks better in real life than in photos.

* * *

The pigeons here are pure white.  But they still behave exactly like pigeons everywhere else.

* * *

A young couple walking the beach at dawn asked me to take their picture.  I answered that I would be happy to, but only if they would let me borrow their camera, because I did not have one on my person.  The woman thought that this was hysterical.

I took a picture for them that could hang in the Louvre–yeah, I’m good–but I’ll be lucky if it ends up on facebook.

* * *

The allegedly best Indian restaurant in Honolulu is very disappointing.  Might as well go with the flow and not try to fight it…  I’ll be eating sushi and grilled fish for the rest of the week.  The whole island is set up to cater to hordes of Japanese tourists, and it’s best to follow the crowds.

* * *

I wonder how long a man has to live here (or in a place like this) before he is not immediately distracted by a woman walking down the street wearing a bikini whose total cloth would not be adequate to serve as a spinnaker on a boat crewed by a single mouse.  Definitely more than one day.  Maybe forever.

* * *

I have a lot in common with surfers, but explaining why I think that would be complicated.  It’s the relaxed obsession.  You’ll either understand this, or you won’t.  I will not be offended.

* * *

Many of the plants and birds and quite a few of the people here would be right at home in a Dr. Seuss book.  I wonder if he ever visited Hawaii or any other part of Polynesia, or whether he did a lot of drugs.

* * *

The mountains are impossibly steep.  They’re not really mountains; they’re a bunch of cliffs that decided to make something of themselves.  Even if it snowed here, you couldn’t ski these slopes.  You could BASE-jump many of them, however.

December 13, 2009

On the events of this morning

Filed under: Nonsense I've spouted — DannyO @ 11:44 am

I arrived at Oahu in the early evening yesterday.  I’d been on the road for nearly sixteen hours.  My tailbone was aching from sitting for so long.  I’d drained the batteries on my iPod and two external batteries as well.  I was exhausted.  After a quick dinner, and a stop by the ABC store to pick up a few items I hadn’t been able to find at home or carry on the plane, I went up to my room to get ready for bed.

At 4am the hotel klaxon went off, telling me in English and Japanese that the hotel had received a threat (of an unspecified type) and that everyone should evacuate at once.  I began to fumble around in the dark for my shoes (I’m not going to make it very far in an evacuation without my orthopedics) but the message was suddenly cut short.  Everything was eerily quiet after the brutal assault on my ears by the klaxon.  A moment later, I could hear people running down the hall.

I decided that it was probably a false alarm.  If there had been a real problem, the message would have continued.  I would have heard more people.  There would be sirens, flashing lights, or something.  But it was still.  I looked out the window.  The sky was clear, the moon a fingernail in the sky.  It was clear like it never is back in Boston.  Without even stepping outside, even in downtown Honolulu, I could see the milky way.  Beautiful.  Serene.

I kept my pants and shoes on, but I went back to bed, on top over comforter, in case I needed to make a run for it.  I dozed off.

My dreams were broken again by the klaxon a few moments later.  I don’t know whether it was a minute or twenty–I couldn’t see the clock.  It seemed much louder this time.  My ears hurt.  Then the voice began again, reassuring me repeatedly that previous announcement had been a false alarm and there was no emergency of any kind.  Everyone could return to their room at their leisure.

Since I was wide awake anyway, and it was mid-morning back home, I called my family to wish them a good morning and I told them this story.  Then they had to get ready for church, so they had to get off the phone.  They suggested that I go back to bed and catch up a little bit on my sleep.

I stripped off my shoes and pants and crawled back under the covers.  In a few moments, I was dreaming again.

Some thought nagged at me, pulling me out of sleep just a moment before 5am.  I was suddenly completely awake.  Something needed my attention.

My mind drifted back to the moment many weeks ago, when this trip was being planned.  We have many younger, very capable people in our group.  I’ve made trips like this before, and the appeal of sitting on planes and running through airports just for the sake of doing whatever it is that I do in an exotic area code has diminished considerably over the years.  And this excursion seemed particularly annoying: nobody in the team I’m meeting with is actually based in Hawaii, as far as I can tell.  They’re from all over the country, but nobody is in Hawaii.  But for some reason, we were all supposed to assemble there.  The equipment would be there.  Why the equipment couldn’t be boxed up and sent to use nobody knew or understood, but that was the case.

When the roster for the trip was posted I was surprised to see myself on it.  I went to talk to the Project Lead to ask him about it.  He told me he thought I’d want to go.  There was a list of people who had requested to go.  He’d put me on the list, even though I’d never made the request.

I told him I wasn’t all that eager to go, and the current roster of people meant that there would be nobody left to run things back at home.  I suggested that maybe I should stay behind and keep an eye on things for him while the rest of the project leadership was in Hawaii.  After all, there was still a lot of work to be done.

He told me it would be fun.  I told him I didn’t think it would be.

He paused.  His line of persuasion wasn’t working.

“Are you telling me that you don’t want to go on this trip?”

“It’s your decision,” I told him.  “I don’t want to take someone else’s spot, if someone else wants to go.  I’d be perfectly happy to stay home.  But if you think it’s important to the success of the project to have me there, then I’ll go.”

“I want you to be there, but how about this.  It’s probably only really important that you be there for the first week.  Just make arrangements to be there for the first week, and we’ll see how things are going.  If everything goes well, I’ll send someone else out after that.”

And here I am.

I’m here because I’ve been in this sort of situation before, whatever that means.  Because I work well when the plan is a bit vague, or there isn’t any plan at all.  Because I’ve seen it all.

And now I’m wide awake for no identifiable reason, and the clock reads 5:00am on the dot.  The curtains are open.  The sky is dark and full of stars, and then the stars are gone.  There’s a brilliant orange flash that fills the room like a flashbulb and silhouettes the row of hotels along the beach.   After the flash I see an orange glow rising into the sky, but there’s a big hotel in the way and I can’t  see the mushroom cloud.  I can see buildings to either side reflecting the glow, however, and I can watch the shadows shorten and I know what that means as the voice in my head calmly counts one-one-thousand, two-one-thousand, three-one-thousand, BOOM.   Less than a mile away, maybe 1,000 yards.

The initial shockwave was followed by endless echos from all the hotel faces and then a grumbling, shuddering noise like the sound of a building collapsing in on itself.

And then another.  And another.  The explosions come faster and faster.  And then the faint echo of distant shouts and screams.

“Oh, crap,” I think to myself.  “I didn’t bring the right equipment for this at all.”   Not, not at all.  And the fact that my luggage was apparently very interesting to the TSA, who took everything out and then repacked it quite badly, is not helping.  (I can’t really blame them for being fascinated by my luggage–the sorts of things I take on travel for work have been known to raise a few eyebrows, but if something is wrapped in bubble pack when they take it out of my suitcase, I’d like it to be put back in my suitcase wrapped in bubble pack again…)  But I am here.

There’s no point in rushing downstairs half-clothed.  I dress carefully.  The electricity is still on–a blessing–and the internet is working.  I consult the local map, trying to memorize where things are.  I can’t find a map I can carry in my pocket.

By the time I make it outside, the streets are choked with people running away from direction of the explosions.  There’s no way I can get any closer without being trampled.  The sight is almost unimaginable: tens of thousands of people of every age, shape, and size, running shoulder to shoulder down the streets of Honolulu at 5:30 in the morning.  And they just keep coming.  There’s no way I’m going to get any closer to the center of the action on the surface streets.  I’ll have to take the beach.

Of course, if you’ve been following the news, then of course you know how this all turns out, but it was a bit alarming at the time and the fact that the entire area is now cordoned off has changed my plans for the morning in a significant manner.  Breakfast will have to wait.

But nothing that has happened has changed my overly melodramatic way of describing things.

December 2, 2009

Dreamscapes

Filed under: General — DannyO @ 4:53 am

The footsteps of the kidnapper and the small child he has taken are clear in the sand.  They are not far ahead but I must hurry because he moves quickly and there are many other people wandering on the beach, creating confounding trails of footprints.  There is not much time.

The trail leads around a dune.  Her backpack is resting against the slope.  As I reach for it, I realize that it is a trap.  The kidnapper is aware of me.  I carefully probe beneath the backpack and find the live grenade.  The pin is out and the backpack is resting on the strike lever.  If I had lifted the backpack it would have been triggered.  Probably a shortened trigger.  I reach through the sand and grasp the grenade and strike lever and draw it out.  I have a twist-tie in my pocket.  I thread it through the pin hole and twist it, just once, over the top.   I was weaponless but now I have a weapon.  But I am on a crowded beach and using the grenade would have terrible results.  I have no clear idea how I might use a grenade to stop the kidnapper.

Perhaps there is a clue in the backpack.  I unzip the backpack and for a moment I see it all before me: the trembler switch, the old strobe flash, a single pair of blue and yellow wires leading to the blasting cap,  and a single stick of dynamite resting in a box filled with gravel.  And then I don’t see anything.

* * * *

Her hair is auburn; straight, drawn back and held in place with a silver barrette studded with turquoise.    A few loose strands play across her forehead.  Her eyes are blue and they sparkle as she smiles.  Her skin is light olive; clear and flawless.  Her lips and eyebrows are thin, her nose elfin.   Her oxford shirt is white, beneath her jacket of powder blue.  A thin silver chain necklace dangles outside her shirt.  Her long, pleated skirt is the color of the buds on an apple tree in April.   She has the build of a swimmer.  There is great energy about her, but she is serene and focused.

I have waited for a long time for a moment alone with her to discuss my worries, and my wait is about to be rewarded.

“It looks like I have all the information I need to finish the paperwork,” she says.  “You don’t need to sign anything.  I’ll take care of getting all of the forms filed.  Please let me know if you have any other questions.”

November 29, 2009

Brief notes

Filed under: General — DannyO @ 1:34 pm

A random collection of paragraphs about my Thanksgiving visit to my in-laws.

The house of my parents-in-law is an old farmhouse. It was constructed in several steps and the process is still on-going (the last few decades have brought a new garage and enclosed porch). I don’t know which part of the house is the oldest, or whether any part of the original house, except for the foundation, still exists. I suspect some parts have been removed when other parts have been added. One symptom of building a house this way is the complexities of the interconnections between the parts of the house. For example, the kitchen has five doors. The dining room has five doors. The pantry, which was a bathroom twenty years ago, has four doors. The downstairs bathroom, which used to be a pantry until fifteen years ago, has two doors, but I think that there used to be one more that has been boarded up. The store-room, which is next to the kitchen, but which is unheated (and used in the winter like a giant refrigerator) has at least four doors. Upstairs is simpler. Each bedroom has one door. The bedroom over the kitchen is unheated, but about ten years ago they added a grate in the floor that lets heat rise from the kitchen. The grate is right over the toaster and coffee maker. It is not easy to sleep through breakfast. There are two staircases from the first floor to the second. One has sixteen steps, and the other has fifteen. I believe the latter is older.

* * * *

At a rest stop on the Mass Pike I saw an enormous woman. Rather than being uniformly fat, she had small shoulders but gigantic hips and thighs. She occupied one side of a booth by herself. Her width was wider than I can describe without you thinking I am exaggerating. I believe there are many doorways this woman cannot enter. I do not know how she can ride in an ordinary car seat. I do not believe she could possibly ever ride in an airplane: not only would she require multiple seats (I’m not sure two would be adequate) but there is no way she could get down the aisle. The thing that amazed me the most about this woman was not her size, but the fact that she appeared to be wearing ordinary, brand-name clothing. It is frightening to think that this woman is an “ordinary” size. This can’t possibly be healthy.

* * * *

I’m pretty sure that there is some sort of religious group whose female members dress in a particular way somewhere near where my in-laws live. Their hair is long and braided. Some wear hats that I think are bonnets, but I don’t really know enough about headwear to say for sure. Their dresses are plain and ankle-length. Their sleeves are long. They are perfectly neat and clean but look as though they’d just stepped out of “Little House on the Prairie” or some such. I believe I’ve seen men from this group, wearing broad-rimmed hats and long beards, but I’m not certain. Usually I just see the woman. They often have children with them. The children are quiet and well-behaved. I usually forget about them by the time I’m talking to someone who might tell me who they are or where they live. Maybe they’re Amish? Or Mennonites? When I see them, it’s usually when we’re shopping at the mall, and there are no horses or buggies in sight. I wonder what they’re shopping for. They’re shopping in the same stores as me, but I bet if we took a personal inventory of all our belongings, the intersection would be very small. I’ve never made eye contact with any of them, or exchanged words. Even in the crowded bustle of the mall, they seem separate and isolated. I don’t think they’re as curious about me as I am about them.

November 23, 2009

Death of a Balrog

Filed under: General — DannyO @ 4:05 pm

One of the things I find fascinating about the “The Lord of the Rings” series by J.R.R Tolkien is how my appreciation of these books has evolved over the last thirty-five years. From a quick description, it’s easy to dismiss these books as the stuff of adolescent fantasy, and it’s true that many devout Tolkien readers discover, devour, and then, for the most part, discard these books during their teenage years. But some do not, and continue to read the back-story for the main action: the terse but meaty appendices of the “The Return of the King”, the torturous Silmarillion, and, for the truly hardcore, the endless volumes of Tolkien’s notes.

It’s clear that Tolkien spent a lot of time thinking carefully about the world he wrote about, including going to the trouble of tracing the conflicts narrated by the “The Lord of the Rings” all the way back to the creation of the world itself and the initial schism between the god and the devil of that world. The result is rich, interesting and unpredictable, unlike the current generation of adventure books and movies, which can generally have their characters and plots (complete with a surprise twist at the end) adequately described in a tweet. In Tolkien’s world, it’s not always easy to tell the good guys from the bad guys, in part because the definitions of good and bad are somewhat fluid and depend on perspective, and because the characters themselves change over time in complicated ways and for non-trivial reasons. In Middle Earth, as in the Christian tradition, it’s important to remember that the most dangerous of the bad guys are the ones who used to be angels.

One of the most memorable, unexpected, and dramatic moments in “The Lord of the Rings” is the revelation of the Balrog and the ensuing duel between Gandalf and the Balrog. Here’s the way it looks upon a quick read of the book: Gandalf is a wizard (whatever that is) and a somewhat mysterious figure. Nobody knows much about his past, except that he seems to know a great deal about many things, and his opinions are pretty damned well considered. The general populace think that he’s a clownish figure with an extraordinary gift for building fireworks of astonishing beauty and complexity, but the wise and powerful seek his counsel on matters of great importance.

Gandalf has offered to guide a group of travelers (whose quest is the central story of the books, but is not important here) and, as result of a complex concatenation of circumstances, is leading them on a short-cut through the underground kingdom of Moria, as a way to get out of the weather. Moria has been abandoned for generations, after a series of attacks by orcs (the foot-soldier bad guys of this world) killed or drove away all of its inhabitants. There was a half-hearted attempt to re-establish the kingdom of Moria in recent years, but it was apparently unsuccessful due to a continued orc presence. No news has been heard from Moria in a generation. There is some scuttlebutt that it seems hard to believe that orcs could be organized enough to have overthrown such a prosperous and powerful kingdom, but nothing definite. In any case, Gandalf claims to have traversed the city before, and believes he can lead the party through the city, avoiding any orcs that might be lurking within.

But things do not turn out as planned. The party attracts attention to itself, and the orcs are soon on their trail. Fleeing, they attempt to wedge one of the main doors shut behind them to cut off the pursuit. Gandalf remains behind and tries to place a spell to seal the door, but his attempt is interrupted. Something enters the chamber on the other side of the door, and it knows about spells too. Gandalf has never felt a challenge like this. They fight over the door, and it explodes in a brilliant flash of light. Gandalf is thrown clear, and the roof of the chamber behind the door collapses, utterly sealing the passage behind the party. But there are other passages. They’ve bought some time but the orcs are still in pursuit. They run for it.

Finally only one barrier remains between them and escaping Moria; a narrow bridge designed to be the last defense of the city, because it can only be crossed in single file. The orcs are near, but the door is nearer. If it is day outside, the orcs will not pursue them and they may escape. But it will not be so simple. Something is coming up behind the orcs, and the orcs part to let it pass. One of the party–not Gandalf–identifies it. It is a Balrog. Although what that means is left unsaid, two well-established badasses in the group are scared witless at the news, so it’s clear that a Balrog is not a welcome sight.

When “The New Yorker” reviewed the first movie, I believe the reviewer criticized the movie for not casting Samuel L. Jackson as a member of the party, because, as the reviewer described it, there isn’t anyone else who could do proper justice to the observation that the Balrog is one mean motherfucker.

Gandalf sends everyone across the bridge before him. The Balrog approaches at a dead run: an enormous figure, veiled in darkness, wreathed in living flame, wielding a flaming sword in one hand and a whip of fire in the other. Gandalf waits in the center of the bridge for the Balrog, staff in one hand, naked sword in the other. Beneath the bridge is an abyss whose depth has never been measured.

But before the Balrog reaches the bridge, Gandalf challenges him, with a challenge that makes little sense to the reader or to anyone listening, except the Balrog, and the Balrog hesitates. The Balrog is given pause, but it is only momentary. The Balrog leaps onto the bridge, swinging its sword. Gandalf blocks with his sword and the Balrog’s sword shatters into a shower of molten fragments, and the Balrog stumbles back. Enraged, it leaps onto the bridge, whip whistling. Gandalf uses his staff to break the bridge beneath the feet of the unrushing Balrog, and it plunges into the abyss, but as it falls it swings its whip, which catches Gandalf around the legs, and drags him into the abyss as well. The rest of the bridge collapses a moment later; Gandalf probably wasn’t going to walk away from this, with or without being dragged down by the Balrog.

This is pretty powerful stuff for a nerdy teenager with an appetite for escapist fantasy.

But it raises questions.

First and most obviously, there’s the question of why Gandalf would choose such an awkward place to make his defense. He seemed able to deal nearly effortlessly with the Balrog’s sword; why couldn’t he have handled his whip? Well, breaking the bridge did effectively end the pursuit. But Gandalf could have broken the bridge without stopping to wait for the Balrog. The Balrog would have found another way across, or had his army of orcs construct one, if necessary, and they might have had to have faced it again, but they could have faced it in a more favorable circumstance and with assistance.

More interestingly, who or what is a Balrog? Nobody seems to be able to give a straight answer to this one. The wisest of the wise, when told of the manner of Gandalf’s death, describe the Balrog as the deadliest bane in the world, save the devil of Middle Earth himself. But that’s not really much of an answer, except to reiterate that he’s one bad motherfucker.

And finally, who is Gandalf, and what did the words of his challenge mean? Why did the Balrog hesitate? If a Balrog is really all that, what did Gandalf say that made him pause, and then make him fight?

What was Tolkien, a mild-mannered, middle-aged linguist, trying to say when he originally penned this tale as part of a letter to his son, away fighting in the war?

I think I know now.

But in order to explain, I must first explain more about the history of Middle Earth. This is a complicated subject, made none too simple by the fact that Tolkien changed his mind about a number of important details over time. I’m sure some Tolkien scholar will say that I have the basic details right, but some nuance incorrect, while some other Tolkien scholar will say that I’ve got everything wrong except the unimportant stuff. Tolkien scholars, after all, are just like any other kind of scholar.

I will describe the creation story of Tolkien’s world in vaguely Christian terminology in order to avoid having to drag in a lot of unnecessary jargon. In the beginning, a benevolent god created the universe and a group of lesser divine beings (angels, if you will). Everything was harmonious for a time, but the most powerful of the angels, Melkor, kept stirring up trouble. Eventually Melkor took on a Lucifer-like role, but he is tolerated far longer and much greater compassion than Lucifer. God created the world that contains Middle Earth as a playground for his angels and then withdrew. Melkor and his adherents, for lack of anything else to do, attempted to conquer the world.

Melkor’s generals and most powerful servants in this war were the Balrogs: a handful of fallen angels of unfathomable power and intelligence; and generally bad motherfuckers that Christianity’s Samael and Puriel would call brothers. They are demons of fire and darkness, able to take many forms, but always terrible to behold. Their most potent weapon is terror itself; few beings can simply withstand their presence. They are the generals of the most powerful army the world will ever know, but they do not lead from the rear–they are always in the vanguard. From the age of heroes, there are many legends of battles against Balrogs, and none of them have a happy ending. To fight a Balrog is to die. The two greatest warriors of the age were each able to kill a Balrog, but only at the cost their own lives.

But powerful as they were, Melkor and his servants were eventually defeated, thanks to help from the unfallen angels, and Melkor was dragged away and imprisoned. Many of his servants escaped capture, however, and hid in various places. Melkor was renamed Morgoth, which roughly translates to “Dickhead to who spoiled this world for the rest of us” and another age passed. Morgoth was released at the end of the age, and although he was still powerful, he was no longer able to assume any pleasing shape, so that his attempts to deceive the peoples of the world would not succeed. Nevertheless, he was soon back to his old tricks, gathering the scattered remnants of his servants and building his dreadful kingdom. The world was partitioned to confine the war to the area away from the dwellings of the divine and the faithful. War raged in the world for hundreds of years, until Morgoth’s adversaries were finally able to successfully plead their case to the various good divinities (who had generally been not entirely pleased with the behavior of either side of the war). The resulting battle between the divinities and their minions altered the face of the world, so great was its violence. At the end, Morgoth’s servants, such as the Balrogs, were hunted down and destroyed, and Morgoth himself was cast into the outer darkness, from which there is no return.

And there was peace, or nearly so, for an age. But the hunt, it appeared, had not been entirely successful. The occasional dragon was known to have survived, and orcs and trolls quickly repopulated their hidden places. Oh, and as it turns out, one Balrog escaped by hiding in the deep foundations of stone beneath the earth. It may be worth mentioning that at this moment, the tale of the tape has this last remaining Balrog as the single most powerful entity remaining in the world.

Sauron, one of Melkor’s lieutenants, who had appeared convincingly to have repented after the defeat of Morgoth, eventually slipped back into his bad habits. Sauron built his own kingdom and attempted to conquer Middle Earth (the section of the world that had been divided from the rest), but he was handily defeated and deposed without any need for divine intervention.

But the divine, although not intervening, were not disinterested. They knew that Sauron, being a fallen angel, could not be easily destroyed, and they knew that his army was not the real source of his strength. And so they were afraid that he would rise again, and they were correct. Eventually Sauron rose again, and in a much more dangerous and cunning form. He was defeated again, but it was a very close battle, and it was even clearer to wise observers that Sauron was becoming ever more powerful even as his enemies weakened, and their last victory was Pyrrhic; they had spent the greater part of their innate strength attempting to defeat him, but all they had really accomplished was to disrupt and disorganize his armies and delay his plans. The source of his power and the strength of his allies and servants were not destroyed.

And thus the divine decided to level the playing field a bit. They sent to Middle Earth a small number of wizards, including Gandalf. The wizards never explain who they are or from where they came, but it’s obvious that there’s something a little different about them because they came from the west over the sea, and nobody comes from the west any more, not after the last great war, when god rendered that part of the world inaccessible except to the elves. They appear as men, but they do not appear to age. They wander from place to place, and are recognized as wise by the wise, but they do not seek power (with one notable exception, who is corrupted and becomes one of the most dangerous foes in the story, seeking to replace Sauron himself). They influence but do not control.

But when it can’t be hidden any longer, it is revealed that Gandalf is one of the agents of the divine himself. He’s an angel of equal rank to a Balrog. And he’s carrying the Flame of Arnor, an ancient and magical weapon created to fight the servants of Morgoth. Everyone knew Gandalf had an awesome sword (it’s pretty hard to hide something like that, in a world where swords see frequent use), but almost nobody knew what sword it was. And finally, although nobody (including the reader) has any clue about this ahead of the time (although Gandalf’s awesome fireworks were a bit of a hint), Gandalf also possesses the Ring of Fire, a repository of unmeasured power constructed before the arrival of the wizards as a counter to Sauron’s power and given to Gandalf by one of the few who recognized him for what he is.

So the Balrog and Gandalf know that it’s going to be a good dust-up, and the Balrog knows that this is a fight it could easily lose.

But it’s been five thousand years since the Balrog has been tested. Five thousand years since he marched at the head of an army that made angels tremble. Five thousand years since its brothers were slain and his master was removed from the world. Thousands of years of hiding, and then emerging to take over an underground kingdom populated with puny mortals who hardly put up a fight. Hundreds of years of having nobody but terrified Orcs to talk to, and listening about how that suck-up sniveling bureaucrat Sauron is now the biggest, baddest badass in the world. This is a Balrog who knew Sauron back when.

This is a Balrog who thought to himself–“I’m getting old, my career is going nowhere, nearly everyone I care about is dead, I’ve been passed over for promotion, nobody reads my books, and I’m stuck in a windowless interior office. Fuck all this. You want to fight? It’s on. I’d rather die fighting than put up with this bullshit. Bring it!” This is what middle age looks to an obscure philologist who has been working for ten years on a book he doubts he’ll ever finish, while his younger peers get money for nothing and chicks for free.

I’m pretty sure Dylan Thomas was thinking about this Balrog when he wrote “Do not go gentle into that good night”; the line “rage, rage against the dying of the light” distills the point perfectly. Balrogs don’t go gentle into anything, but they still need something to rage against, and a challenge from an angel is wonderful goad. At last, an adversary worthy of the word.

Now in case you’re wondering, you can’t kill a Balrog merely by throwing it into an abyss a mile deep. But of course, as anyone who as has seen the movie will tell you, you can’t kill Gandalf that easily either. The battle continues for ten days, and destroys a lot of real estate and scenery, before they kill each other, thus leaving the Balrog’s no-loss streak intact, albeit with an asterix (because Gandalf is given a new body and sent back into the world to continue his task, while the Balrog apparently is not).

It all looks a lot better in the movie, as you can imagine, but it makes absolutely no sense… I will always feel disappointment that Peter Jackson made the Balrog look so big, clumsy and stupid, like the illegitimate offspring of Godzilla and a dragon. But if he’d made it merely large and crafty–a demonic wizard–it would have taken so much more explaining.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcuDMoSOOrs

November 8, 2009

Future history, part 1

Filed under: General — DannyO @ 6:00 pm

One of my daydreams–one that I suspect I share with most other people who have aspirations and daydreams–involves narrating a retrospective of a wildly successful career (as supplied by my other daydreams, unfortunately, because my real life isn’t heading that way right now) in the form of an interview.  Perhaps someone like Barbara Walters or Larry King, or maybe even David Letterman.  I admire David Letterman’s easy, casual interview style, and I like to think we’d get along well and I wouldn’t disappear during an early commercial break.

It’s never Geraldo or one of that ilk.  This is a happy daydream.

For a peek into my lame psyche, I offer a snippet of what I imagine a this might be like.

Host: Tonight we’re fortunate to have on our show Mr. Danny O’Bigbelly, author of the New York Times bestseller ‘The Great Dragon of the Eastern Desert’.  Please welcome Mr. Danny O’Bigbelly!

(Audience claps.  I hobble onto the stage, slightly blinded by the lights.  I’ve been coached not to look into the spotlights, but I can’t help it.)

Host: Nice to meet you.

Me: It’s great to be here.  Is it OK if I turn the seat cushion over?  I think the performing monkeys left a little memento on this one.

Host:  You go right ahead.  Make yourself at home.

Me:  Thank you.  There, that’s better.

Host: So, you are in town promoting your new book?

Me: Yes, doing the whole book tour thing.  It’s a lot of work, and it’s not usually my sort of thing, but my publisher says that it’s very important.

Host: It’s like people are throwing parties for you all over the country.  Why wouldn’t you want to go?

Me: Well, I’m not much of the partying type, and I miss being with my family.

Host: So, tell us about your book.

Me: It’s a combination of a few stories that I’d been working on for several years.  I thought that they were separate stories for a long time, but one day I realized that some of the story lines could be combined and some of the characters could be coalesced; combined into a single character.  I think this makes the stories a lot more interesting, because one of the things I like to explore is character development, and characters don’t usually get a chance to develop much in a short story.  But if you follow the same character through a big chunk of his or her life, then you can see how each part of the story builds upon the foundation laid by the previous stories.

Host: This sounds pretty hard.  Trying to take a bunch of stories and weaving them together.

Me: It would have been a lot more complicated if I was more imaginative or creative, but in this case I got lucky.  Once I realized that my imagination was lazily reusing the same characters and themes in several contexts, it wasn’t very complicated.

Host: So, can you tell me something about these characters?

Me: There are two principle characters, and several other characters that play important roles in their lives.  The first is a young girl, who is on a quest to prove her right to claim her nobility.  She is a princess who lives in a complicated society where adolescents are given several trials of courage, intelligence, and character before they are permitted to claim their titles.  This system has been in place for a long time, and it has generally worked very well, and the citizens in this society have accepted it.  But there is a fly in the ointment, so to speak.  The queen has acquired an unfortunate habit of assigning impossible challenges to potential members of the nobility who are not members of her own house.

Host: So this is sort of fantasy story?  Dungeons and dragons and things of that ilk?

Me: No sorcery, and no dungeons, but perhaps a dragon.  I wouldn’t want to spoil the book for anyone, but one of the quests that the queen has been using is to send people into the Eastern Desert to kill the great dragon rumored to live there.  This desert is a horrible wasteland.  Nobody knows whether people who seek the dragon are killed by the dragon, or whether they are killed by the desert itself, or whether some other fate befalls them.  All they know is that nobody has ever crossed the desert, and nobody who has entered the desert seeking the dragon has ever returned.

Host: Does she know she’s being set up?

Me: Yes, but she feels trapped.

Host: What if she said no, I won’t go?

Me:  She wouldn’t be a princess any more.  She would lose her title and become a commoner.  Which is not a disaster, but it’s not what she wants.  She wants to be princess, and perhaps someday the queen, and she wants her family to regain their nobility.  She’s the last surviving member of her family.  As a princess, she would be rich and powerful.

Host: OK, so she’s got her work cut out for her.  What about the other main character?

Me: He is a bit more complicated.  He’s a middle-aged man who was once a martial artist and teacher at one of the great schools in a far-away land.  He has, however, been sent away from the school.

Host: What did he do?

Me: He didn’t do anything.  Again, it is a question of the power that society, custom, and tradition have over us.  In this school, when the current headmaster leaves or dies, one of the current masters is chosen to replace him.  But in order to avoid the sort of rivalry and potential for bitterness that often occurs when one member of a group of peers is promoted over the others, all of the other masters are dismissed and replaced with new master chosen by the new headmaster according to his vision and criteria.  Most headmasters simply re-appoint the former masters, but not always

Host: So, he didn’t make the cut?

Me:  He wasn’t given the chance.  He was judged to be a strong candidate for leadership of the school, so strong that his presence would undermine the authority of the new headmaster, so he was sent away before the headmaster could even make the decision.  But he wasn’t thrown out or driven away.  He was sent away on a specific mission.

Host: Does it involve a maiden threatened by a dragon?

Me: Oh, no.  This all happened before she was born, in any case.  No, his mission was to serve as a repository for the knowledge and arts taught at the school, so that if anything happened to the school, such as the death of one of the other masters, he could be recalled to serve, or train a replacement, or perhaps simply help choose a replacement.  In the right circumstances, he might even be recalled to serve as the headmaster.  In the meanwhile, he is prohibited to teach and obligated to keep his former position secret.

Host: It sounds complicated.

Me:  It’s really not, and in fact it works well for him.  Outside of the routine and ritual of the school, he is finally forced to find his own way.  And he does, and he finds peace and happiness, and he finds interesting things to do.  He doesn’t achieve the fulfillment of achieving the goals he worked towards for many years, but he finds new, unexpected goals.

Host: But there’s more to it.  I can tell from your hesitation and your smile.

Me: Yes.  There’s another reason he was sent away from the school.  He was given very explicit instructions by the previous headmaster.  But I’m not going to tell you anything about them.  Read the book.

Host:  Do any of those explicit instructions have to do with a damsel distressed by a dragon?

Me:  Well, I will answer that.  No.  The fact that these stories intersect is important, but not in the way that you think.

Host:  I assume this girl and this man meet?

Me: Yes.  He lives in a town at the edge of the desert, and she rides through it on her quest.  He’s seen many other people go into the desert on the same quest, and recognizes her for what she is.  He talks to her about her quest, and when she tells him that she will never abandon it, he promises to tell her everything he knows about the desert and how to survive it.  A lot of what he tells her takes the form of stories about several other interesting characters who live or have lived in the town, and their stories.  She finds these stories somewhat amusing, but does not believe them to be true.  She later realizes that they are very useful.

Host:  That’s it?

Me:  Not by a long shot.  These two people, who might seem like the central characters, are just pawns in a larger game.  There are people who desperately want the princess to succeed in her quest, and others who desperately want her to fail.  There are people who are seeking the master for various reasons.  There’s no shortage of things going on.

Host: It sounds like it.  Now, before we go on, I hear there was some controversy about the names of the characters.

Me: It’s not really controversy, although we can make it sound controversial if you like.  When I first drafted out some of the parts of the book on my blog, I needed names for the characters.  I made some up that I thought were decent working names, and used them.  Eventually the names become “real” names and the other characters started using nicknames or puns based on these names.

Host: But then something happened to make you think that these names were not OK?

Me:  It started when I got some email from a woman who lives in China and who has the same name as my princess.  It turns out that she is a very pleasant young lady, and we’ve exchanged many emails.  I felt funny having a character sharing the name of a person I actually know.  I didn’t want to get the two of them confused in my mind.  For example, I originally imagined the princess to have an athletic, muscular build–the sort of young woman who could wield a two-handed sword convincingly–but my real-world friend is somewhat more willowy.  When I found myself imagining the real-world person doing the things the fictional character was doing in the book, then I knew something had to change.

Host: But you said “names”?

Me: Yes, the name of the other main character was bad for a silly reason.  It was just a nonsense name that I’d originally stitched together when I was looking for a screen name on a social web site.  My name was already taken, and everything I could think of that made sense was already taken, so I just strung together a random-sounding Chinese name and tried it–and it worked!  In retrospect, I shouldn’t have been surprised, since, as far as I could tell, there were no more than about three people with even remotely Asian names on the entire site.

Host: Obviously not orkut or hi5!

Me: Nope.

Host: Well, it looks like we’re running out of time.  After the break, we’ll have Keith Richards, to explain how he’s still cheating death.

(Camera pulls back and cuts to commercial.)

October 28, 2009

Something fresh

Filed under: General,News — DannyO @ 3:57 am

As many of you may already know, I’ve started a forum board.  It’s here:

https://www.public-spectacle.com/smf

at least for now.  (I’m thinking of moving it to a spiffier URL, but these things cost money, so I thought I’d see how it was going first).

Since I really don’t know what I’m doing, I hope you will give me some help.  The most important thing you can do is tell me what I’m doing wrong.  And you can begin today, by reviewing the “charter” (I have to put quotes around the word because it’s not really well-formed yet) of the site, and telling me whether it’s already soured your interest in reading any more.

Here it is:

I’m glad you’ve come to take a look at this forum.  I hope you like what you see here–and if you don’t, I hope you’ll tell me, so that I will have an opportunity to make things more to your liking.

If you would like to register for this forum, your are welcome to.  There are no restrictions on registration; all are welcome to join and participate.  Depending on the final security policy (which is still under consideration) it might be necessary in the future to register in order to read postings here, if people decide that they wish to post information that they don’t want the general public to read, or for Google to index and share with the world, but for the meanwhile, anyone can read anything here.  Please do not forget that fact–what you write here is, for all practical purposes, searchable and discoverable by any interested parties.  If you wish to share information about yourself that you would not want known, please register with an alias instead of your real name, and select the appropriate privacy options in your account settings.

A very important point about the freedom to post is that it is a privilege and not a right.  I am not the government; your first amendment rights do not apply here.  You are here as my guest, but if you become a troublesome guest you will be asked to change your manners, and if that does not remedy the problem, your registration will be revoked.  Rather than try to articulate a complete policy that lists every possible transgression you can make, I will keep the policy simple: if I conclude that your posts are contrary to spirit of camaraderie and, where appropriate, discussion or debate in good faith, I will ban you.  Personal attacks, insults, or hate speech will not be tolerated.

If you are banned for inappropriate behavior, I hope you will not be offended, but will quickly find a more welcoming and sheltering home in another forum.   There certainly are plenty of them out there.

October 26, 2009

Autumn colors

Filed under: General — DannyO @ 2:39 pm

Yesterday my photography companion and I spent some time at the Arnold Arboretum, capturing images of the trees as they changed to the Autumn colors.  The day was perfect, with a sky as blue as a crayon.

October 10, 2009

Dress for success

Filed under: General,News — DannyO @ 8:57 pm

(Copied from the Platte Weekly Herald and Observer)

A key to living a longer, healthier life may be as simple as choosing the right sleepwear, according to Dr. Josephina Ferraro from the Smithsonian Institute’s Department of Ethnology, whose team just returned with a remarkable discovery from the northwest of China.

Dr. Ferraro was drawn to the area several years ago. She had heard reports of villages in the Xinjiang Uyghur region of China where people live unusually long and healthy lives. Several researchers had tried to discover the cause, but had been baffled. “It was a perfect mystery. None of the usual explanations seemed to fit: genetics, diet, environment, culture,” Dr. Ferraro told us. “In every obvious way, the villages of Shuimogou are nearly identical, but there is a cluster of villages whose inhabitants live substantially longer than the local average. We had to take a look.”

After four months in China, Dr. Ferraro’s team had made little progress. They confirmed an earlier finding about happily married couples. “We already expected, from prior research, that happy couples live longer and healthier lives, but the effect we were seeing here was much stronger than anywhere else. We suspected there had to be something more.”

The breakthrough came in January, when one of Dr. Ferraro’s team was interviewing a young woman who had been raised in a remote village but had moved to the local village only a year ago, after marrying a local man. “We asked her to describe everything that was different between her home village and where she lived now, and the first thing she mentioned was that she had a hard time buying the kind of pajamas she was accustomed to.”

It didn’t take long for the team to confirm that the sleepwear in the local cluster of villages is unique. Instead of the ordinary loose, full-length pajamas favored elsewhere, the local pajamas are sleeveless and form-fitting. The women wear rinou (pronounced “rhino”) of cotton or silk that resemble a leotard that would be a familiar sight in any dance or fitness studio in the USA. The men wear rinou that are generally baggier and resemble boxer shorts on the bottom and a sleeveless “muscle shirt” on the top, resembling a circa-1980s basketball outfit.

But how can the choice of sleepwear influence health and longevity? “We don’t know everything yet, but our most promising hypothesis is very simple: it’s cold there at night! People wearing rinous need to cuddle and share body heat. Rinous leave a lot of skin exposed, and skin contact makes people happy, and happier people lead longer, healthier lives,” Dr. Ferraro told us. “That could explain why the same effect does not seem to appear in unmarried or estranged adults.”

The team will be returning shortly to China for more research, but Dr. Ferraro’s discovery has already had a local impact. “My husband and I wear rinous every night, and we find them very comfortable,” she told us. “We feel happier already.”

Your favorite movies

Filed under: General — DannyO @ 8:41 pm

Yet another questionnaire, but this one has a single instruction: name the ten movies that matter the most to you.

Of course, I can’t simply do that.  I need to begin by reflecting on the question itself…

I am not a huge fan of movies. I like watching them but they don’t take on deep significance for me. Some of them are reminders or mnemonics for phases of my life, which I suppose is significance of some sort, but I don’t see my life reflected in movies. Well, not most movies. Maybe just one or two.

1) Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon.

I’ve heard that there are people who don’t like this movie. They probably live in the same parallel universe as Sarah Palin fans: I don’t know any, I don’t know anyone who knows any, I can’t imagine where they came from, or how they came to be. This movie has everything: love, romance, and, of course, Green Destiny.

2) Manhattan.

She doesn’t really have a voice like the mouse in the Tom and Jerry cartoons. Good god, this movie is inspired. I hope I never win the Zelda Fitzgerald Emotional Maturity Award.

3) Monsters, Inc.

I like my movies dialog-driven. This movie has more banter for the buck than almost any other movie. They could probably squeeze in a few more words here and there, but that’s not the point. This is a perfect buddy movie.

4) Predator

“If it bleeds, we can kill it.” It’s become sort of a mantra for me at work. And yes, I have time to duck.

5) One Crazy Summer

I don’t understand why this movie wasn’t more popular than Titantic. OK, that’s a small lie. I understand it. But it’s wrong; a symptom of some flaw in this world–perhaps even original sin. The genius (if I may abuse that word, and I believe I may) of this movie is that most of it is an elaborate setup for five or six exquisite gags. Characters are introduced, situations set up, coincidences occur, all leading to a perfect, otherwise impossible collision. I won’t spoil it for you, but I will mention that at first you’re going to think it’s stupid and unfunny that Bobcat Goldthwait gets stuck in a Godzilla costume and can’t get out of it without help–but then, as events unfold, you’ll realize the complete and utter necessity of a character appearing in a Godzilla costume a few scenes later.

6) Hero

I understand that there are several movies with this title. I am referring only to the one that I like. When the Emperor smiles and gives Nameless his sword, I get chills. Or Moon versus Flying Snow in the orchard, which, if I remember correctly, was described by the New Yorker review as a scene that created a new genre. Sublime.

7) The Matrix

“Whoa…” No, not the famous quote from the movie. That’s the quote from the theater full of film students I saw the movie with, the moment when Trinity jumps in the air at the beginning of the movie. I could almost see the thought balloons rising through the projector’s light (“I have to use this effect!”). And so it has become. So many movies, commercials, etc use these special effects that they’ve lost most of their power, but imagine, if you can, watching that first moment of “bullet time” back in 1999 (I hope I got the year right…). Whoa.

8) The Rocky Horror Picture Show

Perhaps if I had been more socially adept during my college years (it hasn’t really gotten any better, sad to say) then this movie wouldn’t be on my list, but it gave me something to do any Saturday night that I needed something to do… That, and the looong walk home from the Exeter Street Theater.

9) Animal House

I’ve been to parties like that. Or so I’ve heard. I don’t clearly remember much of them. Anyway, it’s pretty damn funny, even now. I wonder whether Senator Blutarsky is republican or democrat?

10) Annie Hall

Yeah, I liked it.

Adult topics

Filed under: General — DannyO @ 8:35 pm

Exhausted by those surveys made up by schoolchildren, for schoolchildren, some friends on facebook came up with a bunch of questions for people with a few more years on the clock.

1. What bill do you hate paying the most?

I’m annoyed that I have to pay someone to cut my lawn. I never thought it would come to this, but then again, I never thought I’d have a front yard that looks like a model for a double black diamond run. I’m not completely invalid but there’s no way I’m getting a mower up and down that slope without it ending up going over the wall and into the street on a regular basis.

I’m also a bit annoyed, but less so, about having to pay for extended day for my kids school. I may have a bad memory, but I don’t remember anything like this when I was a kid.

2. Where was the last place you had a romantic dinner?

It’s been so long that I don’t remember.

Romance is more or less absent from my life.

3. What do you really want to be doing right now?

Something romantic.

4. How many colleges did you attend?

I’m not sure what this question is asking. Probably about matriculation. So let’s just say two-ish. I was only in a degree program at one, but I took some courses at another.

5. Why did you choose the shirt that you have on right now?

I’m wearing a bathrobe.

6. What are your thoughts on gas prices?

I’d pay a lot of money for something that could stop my farting. Seriously–I fart more than any two people I know.

This probably contributes to the dearth of romance in my life.

7. First thought when your alarm goes off?

If we’ve slept until the alarm went off, there’s no time for cuddling before it’s time to wake up.

8. Last thought before going to sleep last night?

Pondering the question of what I’m going to do to straighten out my dead-end career. No answers came to me.

9. Do you miss being a child?

Some parts of being a child were great.

But then again, some parts were absolutely horrible.  I’m probably repressing the really bad memories, so I’ll have to say no.

10. What errand/chore do you despise?

I’m not sure I could call this despicable, but it would be nice of there was someone living in my household who could vacuum, or put in new paper towels and toilet paper.

11. Get up early or sleep in?

Guess.

12. Have you found real love yet?

I guess so.

13. Favorite lunch meat?

Turkey.

14. What do you get every time you go into Wal-Mart?

I don’t go to Walmart often enough to have established a pattern.

15. Beach or lake?

Beach, unless it’s a large enough lake to have a tide. I consider the tide to be the second most important feature a body of water can have. The most important feature, of course, is that attractive women often wear skimpy bathing suits near large bodies of water.

16. Do you think marriage is an outdated ritual?

You say that like it’s a bad thing.

People really seem to enjoy weddings, and as long as this is true, it’s still serving a very useful purpose. I have no objection to people having fun.

17. Sopranos or Desperate Housewives?

My limited exposure to television (especially television that requires cable) makes this question difficult to answer. But from the small amount of info that I do have, I have to say that given the choice between a drama about a bunch of murderous psychopaths and a comedy about people with difficult family relationships, I’m going to go with the comedy every time, so Sopranos gets the nod.

18.What famous person would you like to have dinner with?

Tough call. Most famous people would find me a little boring. And there would probably be people dropping by the table asking for their autograph, interrupting what little conversation we had.

So, I’m going to go with Hatshepsut. Not knowing the ground rules of this hypothetical question, I think she’s a fairly safe bet.

First, she’s an incredibly interesting historical figure. Second, if the powers of hypotheticalism aren’t sufficient to allow her to speak English, she’s probably still good to look at and fairly polite. Third, of the powers of hypotheticalism aren’t sufficient to bring her back to life, since she’s been dead for thousands of years she’s probably not all that pungent any more, and she won’t mind if I eat her dessert.

19. Have you ever crashed your vehicle?

Yes, but it was usually an accident.

20. Ever use a fire extinguisher for its intended purpose?

Whatever I use a fire extinguisher for is exactly what I intend it for.

21. Ring tone?

Whatever it came with.

22. Strangest place you have ever brushed your teeth?

I always brush my teeth inside my mouth.

23. Somewhere in California you’ve never been and would like to go?

The Playboy Mansion?

Sorry, I’m at a bit of a loss. I’ve been pretty much everywhere in California that doesn’t require getting past a bouncer.

23. Do you go to church?

Not very often these days.

24. At this point in your life would you rather start a new career or a new relationship?

New career.

25. How old are you?

That’s a complicated question.

26. Do you have a go to person?

No.

27. Are you where you want to be in life?

No.

28. Growing up, what were your favorite cartoons?

I used to watch cartoons every Saturday. There used to be shows that previewed the cartoons for the next season and I had to watch those. It was very exciting. But I don’t remember any of them now.

29. What about you do you think has changed the most?

Over the years, my capacity to really foul things up has expanded enormously.

30. Looking back at high school were they the best years of your life?

In some important ways, yes.

31. Are there times you still feel like a kid?

I’m not sure.

32. Did you ever own troll dolls?

I think someone in my family did, because I remember playing with one.  The concept of ownership was a bit fuzzy in the context of toys, and so I doubt I actually owned it.

33. Did you have a pager?

Yes. I think it only went off once or twice.

34. Where was the hang-out spot when you were a teenager?

Damned if I know. It wouldn’t have been the cool, popular hang-out if they’d allowed people like me to know about it.

35. Were you the type of kid you would want your children to hang out with?

Probably, although they probably wouldn’t want to.

They just won’t stop asking

Filed under: General — DannyO @ 8:27 pm

It’s like some sort of interrogation, where there same questions are asked again and again and again, with minor variations, in the hope that I’ll slip up, fail to keep the story straight, and the truth will come tumbling out.

But so far, I’ve withstood every variation.

1. What would people be surprised to find in your kitchen or refrigerator?

Amelia Earhart.

At least, it would surprise the heck out of me.

2. Name three (or more) foods that are always in your refrigerator.

Milk, milk, lemonade, and usually something chocolate.

Then later in the week, it’s just milk and lemonade.

When the milk is gone, it’s time for another run to the market.

3. What is the perfect snack?

Perfect for me, or perfect for the snack?

I’ll eat Doritos until I reach the bottom of the bag. Good for Frito-Lay, but not so good for me.

I hate those toasted pita thingies, so they are the perfect snack for me, because I won’t eat them.

4. What are your favorite edible indulgences?

As mentioned before, I enjoy See Food.

The most indulgency thing that I’ll eat is my mother-in-law’s buckeyes. I have never seen these elsewhere and don’t know if other people call them the same thing, but they’re some sort of peanut butter thing dipped in chocolate, about the size of a ping-pong ball. Like what a Reeses peanut butter cup (which I also adore) wants to be when it grows up. It’s one of the few things she cooks that doesn’t make my stomach shrivel. So, I eat them to indulge myself, and nearly everything else she cooks, I eat to indulge her. Fortunately, she gave up cooking altogether several years ago, and the reserves of left-overs are starting to run low.

5. What and where is your favorite restaurant and what do you order there?

You’re trying to order a hit on me; I can tell.

My favorite restaurant changes according to my mood, but I do have a bad habit of ordering the same thing over and over at the same restaurant. For example, when I go to any of the chain of “The Border Cafe” I will order the gulf coast enchiladas, every time.  So that’s the dish to put the poison in.

6. What is/are the most unusual thing you have ever eaten?

I have a strict policy of only eating things once, and therefore each thing I eat is equally unusual.

7. What would you never eat?

I tend to avoid insects. No special reason, but I guess I’m too old to overcome that childhood aversion.

Also, I avoid eating things that are still alive, unless they’re shellfish, or fruit.

Oh, and Amelia Earhart.

A cornucopia of questions

Filed under: General — DannyO @ 8:18 pm

Those folks on MySpace never rest.  Ah, the energy of youth, or something like that.

Did you stand on your tippy-toes when you had your last kiss?

I don’t have kisses. I do something else with them.

And I don’t stand on my tippy-toes very often. Less often than I kiss, and that’s not all that often.

What reminds you of the last person you kissed?

She leaves her stuff all over the house, so there are constant reminders.

Do you ever think about the past?

I remember the past, and sometimes I ponder it, but I rarely think about it.

Although some part of my brain is always sifting through the warehouse of data and experiences I’ve got piled up in the cluttered white elephant shop I call my memory, and every once in a while it finds something interesting. I’ll be going about my business when all of a sudden I’ll have a epiphanette (“In 1980, when that girl I was talking with at the mixer said she needed to find the bathroom, she didn’t really need to find the bathroom. She was just trying to dust me off! If only I had realized this earlier, the evening might, perhaps, have still been salvaged!”)

Do you believe ex’s can be friends?

Everyone always asks this question. The fact that we’ve all answered it already doesn’t seem to change anything. Therefore, I must assume that when people ask this question, they’re not really looking for an honest answer. The way the question is phrased, it is clearly an attempt to rationalize a decision that has already been made, and, perhaps, acted upon.

So, fine. Be friends with your ex. You’re a smart person. I’m confident you’ll be the one to figure out how to make it work. You’ve already made your decision to try, so I’ll just annoy you by telling you that the odds are long.

Do you currently have a hickey, if so where?

I don’t have a hickey. I have a doohickey, a gadget, and several gizmos.

It’s not the same, but I make do.

Last night you felt?

The usual.

Did you have any plans Friday?

Yes. Thanks for asking.

What were you doing an hour ago?

I was either asleep or looking at pr0n.

Where by pr0n I mean real estate ads. I get very excited by the idea of living in a house that isn’t falling down around my ears, and that has space for all my stuff.

Does anyone know your password besides you?

I have several passwords. A few (like my pin) I share with my wife.

Among the others, I’m reasonably confident that two have been sniffed but the others are still secure.

Are all of your friends virgin?

You mean, like “virgin olive oil”? Or do you mean, like “have not had sex?” That little “s” makes a big difference.

I’m skeptical of the former but optimistic about the latter. I’m pretty sure both have happened, in some sense, to all my friends.

Who was the last person to lay in bed with you?

I could just keep making jokes about incorrect grammar and usage, but nobody is going to think they’re funny.

Do you want to see somebody right now?

I’m married, so I’ve bagged my limit. I can’t really manage seeing someone on the side.

When’s the last time you cried?

I don’t know.

Well, technically, I cried out “Snout!” last night when I was playing Super Mario Kart Wii with the kids. I got nailed by a chomper I thought was already at the end of its chain.

Did you know that the human brain is set up so that some words or phrases are spoken automatically in response to specific emotions or situations? It’s why people who have lost their ability to speak (via brain injury) will still cuss if the situation calls for it. Even better, it’s pretty easy to reprogram yourself to say different things. People usually do this without even thinking about it, so that when they get a boo-boo they say “ouch” instead of just screaming. People don’t say “ouch” everywhere; it’s a function of language and culture…

Anyway, it’s really easy to reprogram this, and so, with kids around the house, and my endless feud with SMK, I’ve taken steps to replace “YOU MOTHERFUCKING MOTHERFUCKER! I’M COMING BACK WITH A FUCKING STAR AND SHOVING IT RIGHT UP YOUR MOTHERFUCKING ASS!” with “Oh, Snout!”

What is in your backpack right now?

A bunch of stuff I’ve been meaning to file. Thanks for the reminder.

Would it be more likely of you to fail Science or Math?

I’ll take science for 800, Alex.

Will you regret your next kiss?

Who am I–Nostradamus?

Has the last person you kissed ever seen you cry?

That’s a good question. Ask her.

Are you a forgiving person?

I try to be forgiving. I rarely actually do come back with a star and shove it anywhere.

Although if I happen to have a star, sometimes I get caught up in the heat of the moment.

What are you listening to?

Tinnitus.

Where’s the last place you went besides your house?

Work.

Do you have a best friend of the opposite sex you can tell everything to?

I have a wife, and she more or less fills this role.

Do you believe your ex cares about you?

I’ve been in a monogamous relationship for several decades, so my ex’s, who never really cared about me all that much to begin with, probably don’t remember me at all.

Kill the spider or let it out?

If it’s a bitey kind, it’s dead. Otherwise, if it’s the cool kind, just leave it be.

Are you cheating on someone right now?

No, but if I was, I would be sure to tell everyone on the internet about it immediately.

Are you nice to everyone?

No. I’d like to be, but my manners pretty much suck, and I can be petty, although I try not to be.

For example, there was a woman yesterday who was giving me all kinds of attitude yesterday, and I wanted to tell her off (this woman comes from Sweden, where, apparently, it is considered normal manners to walk up to someone you hardly know and start critiquing their dress and grooming), but I didn’t. But I wanted to. Snout!

Have you ever liked someone you didn’t expect to?

Expect to what?

Have you ever had the feeling something bad was going to happen and you were right?

Often and sometimes.

Is your hair longer than your shoulders?

My shoulders are not long. They are very broad.

Have you ever taken a picture of yourself kissing someone?

No.

Could you forgive your best friend for sleeping with your bf/gf?

My wife is my best friend, so it’s hard to answer this question.

But if she cheated on me, forgiveness would be a challenge.

Did you get a full 8 hours of sleep last night?

Ha!

Have you ever kissed anyone with a name that started with C or D?

Hmmm… Let’s see–there were Kim, Susan, Suzanne, Marianne, Maryann, Eileen, Linda, Debra, Deborah, Diane, Victoria, Elizabeth, Beth, Carina, Patricia, Rita, Anne, Ann, Angela, Robin… those are the names we thought about for our daughters, but didn’t pick. Sorry; what was the question again?

Will you be up before 7 AM tomorrow?

As up as I ever am. Which is not all that much.

If you were kicked out of your house, where would you go first?

It would depend on the circumstances behind the kicking.

In the past week, have you cried hysterically in front of a friend?

No.

Is tomorrow gonna be a good day?

I suppose anything is possible.

Is there anybody you wish you could be spending time with right now?

Sure.

Are you satisfied with your life as of now?

It’s pretty good in a lot of ways, but I see several possible areas of improvement.

Will you talk to someone on the phone tonight?

Dunno. I don’t talk on the phone that much outside of work.

What do you miss most about your past?

The cartilage in my knees and hips, and that I used to comfortably wear pants with a 34-inch waistband.

When’s the next time you will see the last person you kissed?

When she comes out of the bathroom.

In the next 3 months, what are you looking forward to most?

Christmas.

The last person you texted, is the person a he or she?

I’ve never texted anyone, ever. I’m not even sure if my phone does that.

Have you ever gone out of your way to make someone happy?

Yes. In order to make people happy, I usually have to go out of my way. It doesn’t come naturally.

If you had the chance to travel back in time, would you?

I’d send a few guinea pigs back in time first, to see how it went for them. I don’t feel like I can make an informed decision until then.

Someone on your mind?

I keep trying to figure out how to work Guo Jingjing into this.

Done and done.

Is there anything you want to tell someone but you can’t?

There’s a girl I had a crush on for a long time, a very long time ago, and for some reason, I keep thinking that someday I should really tell her. I don’t know why I have this urge. Nothing positive could come of it. But for some reason, I keep thinking that someday, for some reason, I’m going to have to fess up to this.

Do you know anyone who has road rage? Who?

Oh, snout!

How expensive is too expensive for a pair of shoes?

I’d pay almost anything for a pair of shoes that let me walk comfortably without agonizing pain.

For style and looks, my limit is about $100.

If you were going out with your celebrity crush, what would you wear?

Whatever the well-dressed man-about-town is wearing these days. I’d have to do a little research first in order to find out what that is. But I wouldn’t spend much time or money on it, because I’m reasonably sure that she’d ditch me pretty early on.  It should be something I’d look good walking home alone in, and perhaps could use for another occasion.

Would you rather name your daughter Andrea or Eva?

No.

If you had to get up at 6am tomorrow morning, would it be painful?

Not for me.

If you were adopted, would you want to know?

I’m sure my parents would tell me eventually. It would probably come up during a conversation about how nature has trumped nurture once again.

What is bothering you right now?

The length of this quiz.

Did you ever really believe that the stork brought babies?

No. There are no storks where I grew up, and plenty of babies, so nobody even bothered with this myth. It just wouldn’t hold water.

Do you know anyone who always looks perfect? Who?

No.

Who are the last people you saw kiss?

It was on TV. I don’t know their names.

Chapstick or lipgloss?

No thanks; I’m good.

What was the last unpleasant thing to wake you up?

The passage of time.

Do you have any friends who are ALWAYS kissing their bf/gf?

No.

Would you rather look at clouds or stars?

Clouds.

Long story. Tell you another time.

Do you have any relatives who are expecting a baby really soon?

Not that I know about.

Dare you to go in detail why you kissed the last person you kissed?

What the fuck is your problem with all these questions about kissing?

What are three things you did today?

I’m still in the middle of #2.

Are you taller than 5 foot 7 inches?

Yes, when standing.

Are you one of those people who just don’t care?

No.

Name one thing you love about winter?

Spring follows it.

Have you ever had sex in a tent?

That’s a darn good question.

Do you think there is someone thinking about you right now?

Yes. She’s miffed that I haven’t taken my shower yet.

Were you smiling in the last picture taken of you?

Probably.

Is there something that reminds you of someone every time you see/hear it?

Yes.

Have you ever had a black and white cat?

I don’t believe that people “have” cats.

Do you think a lot before you fall asleep?

Nope. My head hits the pillow and two or three hours later, I’m out like a light.

Is there someone you wouldn’t mind kissing right now?

It’s probably not you.

Do you live each day like its your last?

No. That would be idiotic. I’d be wrong every day except one. You can’t make progress toward a better future if you don’t first believe that there will be a future.

Are you happy with the choices you’ve made?

Meh. I’m doing OK.

Do you think you are a good person?

I’m not perfect. But I’m not completely awful, either.

Is it okay to kiss people if you’re single?

If I hadn’t, I’d probably still be single.

How many people would you say you’ve been “serious” with?

All of them.

What friend do you get along with the best?

My wife.

Do you still get Easter Baskets?

No. I give them.

Do you have curtains in your room?

Yes.  The Neighborhood Watch Committee, who apparently are on the lookout for crimes against taste and aesthetics as well as ordinary theft and larceny, provided them as a house-warming gift.

Are crayons better than colored pencils?

No. They might think they are, but we’re all god’s children.

Who is the last boy you hugged?

Huh?

How about the last girl?

How about her, indeed. Ain’t she something?

Did you date someone you regret dating?

Yes, I’ve dated.

Have you kissed anyone in the last 7 days?

You need to talk to someone about your obsession with the kissing habits of strangers.

Someone other than me.

Are there certain things that can’t be joked about with you?

The evidence points to yes. I tried to start a joke thread a while back, and it failed. Utterly. Even though there were punchlines just scattered around everywhere, waiting for someone to pick them up. I made it so easy, but it just couldn’t be done.

Here’s the thing that can’t be joked about with me:

Two women are showering in a locker room.
The first woman says:
The second woman responds:

It would seem easy to fill in the blanks, but apparently it cannot be done.

Do you think there are circumstances when it’s okay to wait for someone?

If they’re late?

If you had to have a drug test right now, would you pass?

Depends on what they’re testing for.  I’m fairly ignorant about current drug slang and whatnot, but if it’s multiple choice I can usually guess my way through.

Do you know anyone named Austin?

Yes, of course.

Is there a girl that knows everything or mostly everything about you?

I’m afraid so.

Get asked anything ridiculous recently?

Very recently.

Kate’s speedy seven

Filed under: General — DannyO @ 5:13 pm

Another one of those question thingies.  At least this one is short.

1. Do you have a pet name people call you?

Well, of course, there’s “DannyO”. I don’t know if that counts as a pet name. It’s more of a nom de plume.

My wife used to call me “Boo.” I have no idea why, but one day, after I bought a copy of “To Kill a Mockingbird”, she stopped calling me that. That reminds me–I should really read that book someday. I’ve heard it’s pretty good.

In my younger days, I used to be called “Duck” or occasionally “The Duck”. There’s a long and mildly interesting story about that, but it’s not brief. Maybe I’ll write it down another time.

2. Do you play a musical instrument?

I used to play several, but I’ve mostly let it go.

I would probably pick it up again, except the instruments I play make a lot of noise and that limits when and where I can practice. My leisure activities have become things I can do quietly, in the middle of the night, when the kids are asleep. For example, this.

3. When given a choice what chain restaurant do you choose to eat at?

The one whose name a preposition ends in.

Or probably ‘On the Border’ or ‘The Border Cafe’. I forget which of those is a chain. Maybe both.

4. What sports teams do you follow?

None with much fervor, although I do follow the local teams because everyone else seems to and it has a big impact on the local mood. For example, the morning after the Yankees sweep the Sox, it’s a bad idea to come waltzing into the status meeting all smiles and proclaim what a wonderful day it is to be alive, just because the computers are behaving. People will have been up late the previous night, and they’ll be pissed.

5. Quote that you live by?

Life is too short.

6. Favorite dessert?

I don’t know. These things are highly contextual.

7. Pet peeves? Name 3.

a) People who ask limiting questions. What if I only have two pet peeves? Or what if I have four that annoy me equally? Why three? The question should be flexible and adaptable to the needs and situation of the answerer.

b) When other people have pet peeves that show greater emotional maturity and perspective than I’ll ever be able to muster. Which is pretty much everyone, all of the time. I get annoyed by little things, such as being annoyed by little things.

c) Unfairness. Let me give you a stupid example that illustrates both unfairness and my singular lack of emotional maturity and perspective: in my division, offices are assigned according to a formula that is both baroque and byzantine. Here’s the result: although I am the senior member and leader of my ten-person team, I am also the only person who does not have a window office or my own office thermostat, except for the intern, whose office is larger than mine. I consider it unfair that there are empty window offices, and new hires are being placed directly into them, while in the meanwhile I (and several people in similar circumstances) are left languishing in dark, airless, internal offices. I shouldn’t take this personally, because I am just a pawn in a bullshit territorial game the vice presidents play against each other, and my office really is entirely adequate for my needs, but I still can’t help but be annoyed that there are empty offices overlooking a small forest that is starting to show its autumn colors, while in the meanwhile, I’m looking at the walls of a small, unventilated office that doesn’t seem to have been painted since leisure suits were popular. I think this is unfair.

Questions from my friends on MySpace

Filed under: General — DannyO @ 4:55 pm

I don’t really understand the phenomenon of people composing lists of questions and then passing them around to all of their friends, who forward them to all of their friends, etc, until they achieve a life of their own, circling the internet in the same manner that rubber duckies and sneakers, washed off the decks of cargo ships, circle the Pacific Ocean endlessly, mapping out invisible ocean currents and unsuspected relationships between members of MySpace, Facebook, Friendster, Orkut, et alia.

But just because I don’t understand it doesn’t mean that I’m immune to it.  Quite the contrary.

Here’s one I received recently.  Feel free to not pass it along.

1. Do you have any empty beer cans lying around anywhere?

Beer is packaged in cans now? Why? Besides the fact that aluminum requires an incredibly large amount of energy to mine, refine, process, and recycle, there’s the simple matter of taste. There’s also the simple matter of heft. If I’m a bar fight, I’m not going to try to defend myself with an empty can–not when my opponent probably has an empty Corona bottle hidden in his shoe. No sir.

Or by ‘beer cans’ do you mean kegs? No, I don’t have any empty kegs lying around.

2. Do you clean out your ears regularly?

My doctor is constantly admonishing me that I shouldn’t put anything smaller than my fist into my ears. I’ve tried to explain that the only Q-tips I can find anywhere are considerably smaller than my fist, but he doesn’t seem to understand.

3. Do you lounge around in pjs all day if you have nowhere to go, or do you actually get dressed?

I used to have that habit. Now my kids are getting older, and they’re bringing their friends over to play regularly, so at least I have to throw on a bathrobe or something. As they get older, I’ll become even more diligent. I’ve already started to remember to close the bathroom door.

4. Do you still have any toys from when you were a kid?

It seems astonishing in retrospect, but my all-time favorite toys are things that I’ve had since birth, but didn’t realize the infinite delights and hours of enjoyment they could provide to me until I was well on my way through puberty. I’ve been playing with them almost every day since then, and plan to continue until well into my dotage.

I refer, of course, to logic, abstraction, and prose, which I convert, using techniques I learned as a juvenile, into playthings to amuse and distract myself and my companions during the dark hours of our existence.

Honorable mention goes to my penis.

5. Do you smoke weed regularly?

Do I look that stupid?

6. Do you like Windows, Macintosh or Linux better?

I hate to nag, but isn’t this question supposed to read “Do you like Windows, Macintosh, Linux, or something better?”

I’ll go with something better. Until it comes along, I’ll continue to use all three, depending on what the customer wants. On my own time, I’ll use a mac. Or, occasionally, something else.

7. Do you plan on going to college? If so, would you like to do it on a campus or online?

I have a feeling there are two questions here. I will answer them separately.

I don’t plan to go to college again. I’m sort of tempted to do some sort of adult education thing sometimes, because there are a lot of things that I’d like to learn, and I think some structure and critique would be helpful, but I don’t really have the time. And I would probably get terrible grades.

I would like to “do it” on a campus, because it would be just like old times, but I’d probably get in trouble.

8. How many DVDs do you own?

Enough so that I don’t know how many I have, but not enough that I know how many I have.

9. Did you know that JK Rowling is planning to make another Harry Potter book?

No, and I don’t think she really is. I would have heard already, from my daughters.

10. Are you on MySpace all damn day every single day?

No. MySpace didn’t exist when I was single.

11. Are there any pictures that you need to get developed?

I’m glad you asked, because it brings up something that I’ve wanted to discuss for a long time.

No.

12. Are you constantly running out of socks like me?

I don’t run fast enough to do that. I’d really like to see you do it, however, because I’m pretty sure that your socks would be among the last things that come off as a result of your extreme fleet-footedness. Just promise you’ll slow down long enough for me to make sure your socks have come off.

13. How many CD players are in your house?

Hmm. All my computer have CD players in them, so that makes six in the office, three in the living room, one in the kitchen, one in the basement… And in the parts drawer, in case any of these break, there’s one more, maybe two. In the basement there’s the old CD player from the component stereo, plus a boombox with two drives, for three more. The alarm clock plays CDs, so there’s another, and my daughters have on in their room as well. Then there’s the stereo in the living room, and the DVD player, which doubles as a CD player, and also the Wii, which who knows, might be able to play CDs. And in my knapsack, there’s my laptop from work, for one more. And my wife’s old Sony Discman, which she bought in case she ever decides she needs music while exercising.

OK, I think you’ve accomplished your goal of embarrassing me.

14. Do you know anyone who’s pregnant?

Maybe. I do know some females physically capable of the deed.

15. What kind of dog food do you feed your dog?

I don’t have a dog.

If I did, I’d probably feed him or her something high-quality (pride would not permit me to malnourish a friendly guardian of my decrepit manse) but dry. Like Purina dog chow, or whatever turns out to be good. I’d do research. I’d experiment. Due diligence would be done.

But I know I wouldn’t feed the dog table scraps, nor would I feed the dog canned, wet dog food. That stuff looks and smells terrible. It looks like it just came out of the hind end of something with an upset stomach..

16. When you see a baby, is your reaction “Aww, how cute!” or “Eww, get it away!”?

My reactions are never that simple and easy to describe.

Besides, overly constrained questions are one of my pet peeves.

16. When you see a baby, is your reaction “Aww, how cute!” or “Eww, get it away!”?

Neither. Even if I’m thinking it.

I’m an adult. My reaction to a situation and my feelings about that situation can be decoupled.

17. How many pairs of shoes do you own?

I don’t know.

18. How many mugs are in your house total?

A bunch. I can’t believe anyone cares enough about this answer to make it worthwhile for me to actually root around in the cabinets and boxes in the basement to get a precise number. It’s probably not even worth finishing writing this sente

19. Do you own any wine glasses?

Yes.

20. What about fine china? Does your family even use it?

Yes, but we rarely use it. It’s covered with gold leaf, which makes washing it a bit of a hassle. The big family get-togethers when we’d be most likely to use are the meals that have the most attendees, and therefore are when it’s most tempting to use the dishwasher… but this would ruin them forever.

21. Eventually do you want to get married?

Marriage should never be wanted eventually.

Getting married is like ripping off a band-aid. The question of marriage should never be taken lightly, but once you’ve weighed all the alternatives and settled on marriage as the only tenable course of action, it should be done quickly, with as little thought or hesitation as possible, lest one or both of the parties contract a case of cold feet.

Also like ripping off a band-aid, it is good to have an ample supply of alcohol, gauze, and various ointments standing by in readiness.

22. How many computers are in your house?

I think I already answered this when I was counting my CD players for you. It’s a bunch. From this century, however, fewer than half that number.

23. Do you still play old school Nintendo games?

This question makes no sense. There are no “old school” Nintendo games.

Spacewar is old school. Hunt the Wumpus is old school. Adventure is old school. Rogue, Hack, and Moria are old school. These are games the parents of people who play Nintendo games used to play when they were the age their children are now.

Although this question makes no sense, I think I can still answer it. No. I don’t think I even have any Nintendo stuff around the house, except the Wii.

24. Have you ever been to Hawaii or Alaska?

Twice, and once. I’ve flown over Alaska a few times without landing. Looked pretty awesome from up there.

25. Would you ever want to live in either of those places?

No, although both are pleasant to visit.

Hawaii is not really compatible with my ghostly-white complexion. I don’t tan. I barely even freckle.

Alaska is spooky. I was there in June, and the sun kept following me around. It seemed to circle the building while I was working. I don’t know why it seemed to be some interested in me; I hear during the winter it wanders off and shows no interest in anyone. I don’t think I’d survive an Alaskan winter.

26. What kind of sense of humor do you have?

Juvenile.

27. What was your last phone conversation about and with whom?

Something boring, with someone from work. ‘Nuff said.

28. What was your grade point average in high school?

Pretty pathetic. I don’t remember the number, but I clearly remember my high school guidance letting out a low, long sigh and rubbing his furrowed brow for about thirty seconds at the beginning of our mercifully brief sessions. I think the topic of vocational training came up a few times.

After I was kept back for a year, and then when I decided that maybe college was a good idea after all, I turned it around, but by then the damage was done to my average. The average of two dreadful years, one average year, and two good years is still fairly dreadful.

29. What is one of your favorite movie quotes?

Anything from “Animal House” qualifies.

30. What song do you have stuck in your head right now?

“Birthday” by The Beatles. In a few minutes, it will be “Yer Blues”. At least, that’s what my iPod says, and it’s in charge of sticking songs in my head right now.

31. Do you have an innie or an outie?

One of each.

32. How would your friends describe you?

I don’t know. Ask them. If you want a really honest answer, don’t ask them in public.

In the meanwhile, I don’t mind people saying nice things about, especially if they’re plausibly true. For example, people might say that occasionally I string together a sentence that is a self-contained joke. Perhaps even somewhere in this note.

33. Would you kiss a really ugly person for $10,000?

There are so many facets to this question that it twinkles and glitters like the sequins of the half-unfastened outfit of a Las Vegas showgirl, pinned to the stage by the beams of a dozen spotlights, writhing uncontrollably with ecstasy as my tongue slowly, methodically, scientifically and yet inexorably searches for the perfect roll, pitch, yaw, depth, mode, skew, kurtosis, and frequency to drive her over the brink, gibbering with pleasure, during the bachelor party I will swear on the bible never happened.

But since time is short, I will focus on one simple and obvious aspect.

Who decides who is or is not really ugly? Because I’m willing to let you pay me $10,000 to call my wife really ugly. I’m going to kiss her anyway, and she’ll laugh it off when she gets her half. Heck, for $5,000, I might even get more than one kiss.

If it’s up to you, and you don’t happen to think my wife is really ugly, then my answer is probably no. I choose who I kiss, and the freedom to make that choice is worth a lot more to me than $10,000. But if you happen to find Guo Jingjing hideous, maybe I’ll take your money anyway.

37. How many hours of sleep did you get last night?

Not enough. I had a terrible nightmare. No, not the one with the monster. A different nightmare.

38. Are you capable of murder?

In the right circumstances, we all are.

39. Are you pro life or pro choice?

I don’t believe that it’s up to me to impose my beliefs on other people, so I’m both.

I am pro-life but I support the notion that other people can make their own choices.

40. What is the last thing you spent money on?

Lunch.

41. When is the last time it snowed where you live?

I think it started around 4:30am. I have forgotten the date, however.

42. when is the last time you exercised?

Exercised my what?

Please refer to the answer to #47 for additional related discussion.

43. Have you ever lived in another state?

There are so many different meanings of the words “life” and “state” that I could have a field day with this.

But I sense the trap.

So, I will merely answer that if two years in Rhode Island counts as living in another state, then the answer is “yes”. Otherwise, the answer is “probably”.

44. Do you think anyone really reads the surveys you fill out?

Accidents do happen.

45. How many friends do you have on myspace?

How many friends do I have that use MySpace? I don’t know, but not a huge number. I’m not a member of their core demographic. Or any of their peripheral demographics.

How many friends do I have connections with on my MySpace account? I’m not sure, but I think I canceled my account, but I might have simply abandoned it.

46. If your friend count goes down, do you try to figure out who deleted you?

I don’t know what my friend count is right now, I don’t know how to figure it out, and I don’t care all that much. As long as people keep sticking stuff up on my wall, and are reasonably friendly, I figure I’m doing OK. I’d rather have a smaller number of good friends than a large number of random people who can’t remember why they friended me in the first place.

However, the question presupposes that my answer could be different, and therefore it may be true that there are a lot of people out there who do count their friends regularly and try to figure out who dropped them, etc. I also suspect that that sort of people are the sort of people that I am most likely to drop.

47. what scent are you wearing right now?

Sometimes the questions reveal more about the questioner than the answers reveal about the answerer. This is one of those times.

Unlike most of the other questions in this list, questions #42 and #47 do not refer to general characteristics, habits, or tendencies. They ask about very specific details that are defined relative to the moment when the questions are answered. They are also written in a different style, using a different set of constructs. Instead of asking “Do you often wear a scent?”, which presumes nothing about the answer, or “What scent do you usually wear?”, which makes a mild and easily negated presumption that the answerer wears a scent, the question makes a strong assumption that I am wearing a scent at this very moment, and provides me no easy way to defeat the assumption that this is a question whose answer one can reasonably expect to name that scent. And yes, I have stopped beating my wife.

When one examines the question more carefully, one finds two more troubling clues. First, the capitalization of the first word of the question is inconsistent with most of the other questions, indicating carelessness, perhaps anxiousness, but in any case an unwillingness to revisit the question long enough to proof-read it. This is clearly an off-the-cuff question; unpremeditated and perhaps even spontaneous.

Second, the repeated reference to the present: although “are you wearing” clearly indicates that this question refers to the present condition, the questioner did not feel that this was sufficient, and therefore appended a completely redundant “right now”. This reinforces the evidence that this question was not subject to the same care as the other questions.

Coupled with #42, with its similar issues, I infer that the questioner is not interested in my answer. This is a rhetorical question; a reminder to take a shower. Duly noted.

48. Do you text a lot?

No, but I prose too much.

49. Do you shop at WalMart regularly?

No.

50. What..s your favorite store at the mall?

The store where they trade apostrophes for periods. You should check it out–they’re having a two-for-one sale right now.

August 28, 2009

The second heuristic of blogging

Filed under: General — DannyO @ 3:42 pm

If your spouse hasn’t “had time” to read your blog for three months, then your writing probably isn’t all that entertaining.

At least, that’s her theory.

August 23, 2009

Do people think that you are smart?

Filed under: General,Uncategorized — DannyO @ 11:50 am

There’s another one of those “answer a bunch of questions” things floating around again, and I’ve recently received several copies.  I don’t believe that the answers to most of the questions in this particular quiz are actually going to shed new light on my personality, but one of them caught my eye:

  • “Do people think that you are smart?”

Perhaps it would be best to answer this question with a story about a hypothetical situation.

Let’s imagine that we are going to meet for the first time, and we’ve arranged to get together for dinner.  Perhaps I am on a business trip, staying near your home, and you invite me to get together for dinner.  For whatever reason (and there might be many) you invite me to pick you up at your house.  Maybe you don’t drive, or maybe the idea of being environmentally responsible and only using one car appeals to you.  The precise reasoning is not important.  The essential fact is that I will be coming to your home.

I arrive slightly early, or perhaps exactly on time, but you aren’t ready yet.  Something came up.  You mean no disrespect by being late, but you’re not worried.  We’re under no time pressure and I am not put off when you tell me that you’re not ready to go and will require a few more minutes to prepare yourself.  I seem calm and unconcerned; nonchalant.  If we arrive at the restaurant late, it will not be a problem.  The restaurant will not be crowded and they will hold the table.  I have no other obligations for the evening, and small, random acts of fate such as this do not annoy me.

You ask me to make myself at home in the living room while you go and finish whatever task you need to complete before we can go.  You see me scanning through the books on the shelf behind your couch.  You wonder whether I read the same books as you do, as you go off and finish whatever it is that you need to do.  Maybe you are feeding the cat.  Or moving the laundry from the washer to the drier.  Or putting the finishing touches on an important memo for work.  Or maybe you’re finishing your face.  Or perhaps you are slipping a small dispenser of mace into your purse and making a quick call to your best friend, asking her to eat dinner tonight at the same restaurant so you have a get-away driver if I turn out to be a creep.  It could be any one of a number of things, but the details, however interesting, are not salient.

When you are finished, we go out and have dinner.  We have a light conversation.  I nurse one drink all evening.  I am amusing and passably witty, but seem to have disappointingly little familiarity with current trends, celebrities, as well as politics and recent world events.  I am polite, but I answer questions about my family and upbringing with playful evasiveness that is subtle enough that it is hard to detect when I am being honest and when I am also being disingenuous.   Eventually you conclude that my real life is not particularly interesting and I am trying to insinuate via my vague or ambiguous answers that it is much more interesting than it seems.  My answers are always honest, but perhaps incomplete, or imprecise.  Sometimes you guess that I am willfully misinterpreting your questions, but in such a way that my answers are more entertaining and illuminating than the answers you expected.  For example, when you ask me “Why did you adopt children from China?” I will spend at least fifteen minutes talking about the myriad differences between the adoption programs of different countries and the manifold differences between the different adoption services and agencies that assist people going through the adoption process.  At the end of my explanation you will have a complete taxonomy of the adoption options available and a process by which anyone interested in adoption can choose the most appropriate country from which they should adopt a child.  By the time I finish talking, you will have forgotten that what you were really interested in asking was why I considered adoption in the first place.  You have paid the price for asking the wrong question, and that price is having to listen to a facile speaker describe, with candor, humor, and insight, a topic about which you have little interest.

I mumble, and sometimes I don’t hear your questions or comments, particularly if the restaurant is crowded and noisy.  If it becomes a constant issue, I might explain that I’ve suffered quite a bit of hearing loss over the years and have a hard time understanding what people are saying when there are a lot of distracting sounds, and that sometimes I mumble or speak too loudly because I don’t always know how loudly I am speaking.  I will avoid mentioning this if I can get away with it, but if you look very puzzled by some of my answers I will assume that it is because I didn’t understand your question and responded to something I only imagined you’d asked.

At the end of the evening, I drop you off at your house and drive away.  You do not invite me in.  There isn’t even any question in your mind about whether this is an option.  I am married, as I have mentioned many times during the evening, and am not physically attractive.  You feel some doubt that whether meeting me in person was really a great idea–in your imagination, I was much better looking and more scintillating than I turned out to be in real life.   You also imagined that I would be a snappier dresser, but you chalk this up to the fact that you imagined that I would be shorter and thinner.  People who shop at Big and Tall shops don’t have the same fashion choices as people who buy off the rack and Abercrombie and Fitch.  You are willing to cut me some slack here.

The next morning, you notice something unexpected in your living room.  Over the years, from strange relatives, coworkers, and well-meaning but poorly-advised friends, you have collected a small pile of brain-teasers, puzzles, and things of that ilk.  Tangles of chain or rope and twisted metal from which the goal is to remove a ring.  Pieces of plastic or wood that have been carved or formed in strange shapes that allegedly combine in some unknown way to form a pyramid or a cube or polar bear or something.   Things that came in boxes that said things like “10,000,000 wrong ways, but only one solution!”  Things you took out of the box and played with for a few hours, or maybe a few days, and then put up on the shelf, unsolved, forgotten.  When children come over to the house, you can distract them for a few minutes with these as games or toys, but generally they just catch dust on the bookshelf behind your couch.

Today six of them are catching more dust than usual, because they are arranged in a neat line spanning your coffee table.  Each of the puzzles on the coffee table has been solved.  There are more puzzles on the shelf behind the couch, but they appear to be untouched.  You notice that the untouched puzzles are the “easy” puzzles.  The solved puzzles on the coffee table are the really hard ones, including a few that you’d given up for impossible.

How did this happen?  Who put them there?  You couldn’t think of anyone else besides me who could have arranged them like that.  But how?  How long had I been there?  You run through your memory.  I couldn’t have been alone in the living room for more than fifteen minutes, and there are six solved puzzles.  One hundred and fifty seconds per puzzle, and these are the puzzles that nobody you know has been able to make any headway on.  Just putting the pieces together, even with the answer in hand, would take most of that time.

You look again at the puzzles on the shelf.  They’re not exactly where they were.  The puzzle that your niece managed to take apart but couldn’t put back together again is whole once more.  The pyramid composed of plastic pieces now has a green piece on top, even though you are certain that when you solved it, the piece on top was red.

You revise your estimates.  The six on the coffee table aren’t the only six I solved.  They’re simply the ones I was still working on when you yelled from the other room that you were ready.  They were the six I didn’t have time to put away.

Now, if you’re still reading this, and believe that it might be even somewhat accurate, then the answer to the question is that at least you think I’m pretty smart.

Less hypothetically, the people who pay me think I’m sufficiently smart, and the people who love me don’t care all that much, and as for the rest of you, well, it probably doesn’t really matter.

August 2, 2009

And the winner is…

Filed under: General — DannyO @ 2:45 pm

One of my favorite duties, as editor of this site, is choosing the honorees for the greatest innovators of the century every hundred years.  The twentieth century teemed with innovation in a myriad fields, and choosing one luminary from among the burgeoning cohort of inventors, visionaries, and pioneers has not been easy.  It has taken well over eight years to conclude the search, and with such a strong field I must admit that there were many times when I felt the temptation to settle on an arbitrary member of the short-list.  I felt that nobody could fault my selection of any of them; their accomplishments were both strong and widely recognized.  Nevertheless, I could not surrender so easily.  The mantle of this responsibility must not be set aside lightly.

Innovation takes many forms.  I consider it related to and yet distinct from invention; invention solves a problem or answers a question, while innovation makes the old problems disappear or the questions irrelevant.  It is possible to innovate without invention, and to invent without innovation–but in many successful developments, an element of each is required.  When comparing two innovators, however, I focus on the impact that the innovator has had, rather than the cleverness innate to his or her innovation.

I also consider the ubiquity of the change effected by the innovation.  An innovation that remarkably improves the life of a small segment of the population does not have the impact, in my opinion, as an innovation that makes a modest improvement in the lives of everyone.

The honoree for this century is responsible for a remarkable change in the travel habits of nearly every member of our species.  It is hard to believe the change effected in just a few short generations, and the ripples of change resulting from his innovation are still spreading.  Members of the younger generations may not fully appreciate the change wrought; they have always lived in a world where great distance is not a daunting barrier.

With no further ado, I present the winner of the Reginald Thistledown prize for the twentieth century:  Theodore Entwhistle, pioneer, visionary, and evangelist of the simple fact that Canadian geese no longer need to fly south for the winter and north for the summer; they can just hang around the high school playing fields, corporate parks, golf courses, and public pools year-round.

July 19, 2009

Around the yard: 7/29/2009

Filed under: Uncategorized — DannyO @ 7:44 am

If this seems familiar, it’s because I messed up the first upload and am trying again.

July 12, 2009

The last box

Filed under: Uncategorized — DannyO @ 3:59 pm

(My last thread on TBD, before the site closed on 7/13/2009)

Whenever I move my domicile, the first steps of packing are always quick and easy: dump all of the things I don’t need daily into a box, tape it up, slap a label on it, and put it in pile with the rest of the boxes. It’s a mechanical process and most of it goes very quickly.

But there are always a few odds and ends that don’t seem like there’s any box of them to go into, or that I feel I need to have with me. The things that never get packed, because they’re not really part of my belongings–they’re part of me.

The compost of notes on top of my dresser. The knick-knacks on my desk. The curios on the mantle. The stuff that can’t be replaced.

They’re all small things. Their physical sum doesn’t fill a packing box, but their meaning fills my life.

I have a number of small things like that here, but I can’t pack them. TBD is an organic part of them. They’ll have to stay. But first, I rifle through them one more time.

You know how this game is played–I’ll show you mine, and then you show me yours. I know you have some. We all do. Small things we want to say.

I’ll go first.

= = = =

First, I never knew that I could write things that people would find entertaining. Informative, sure–at my day job, I write dry, informative things all day. But I never had a clue that I could write things that people could actually enjoy reading. Not even an inkling.

But now I do have an inkling. I can string words together in a way that people enjoy reading, and I enjoy doing it.

I love it when I find something new that I enjoy doing. Isn’t it a wonderful feeling?

So, if you ever wrote to me telling me that you enjoyed what I wrote, I thank you from the bottom of my heart.

And if you were just bullshitting me, I will thank you from beneath the bottom of my heart to keep it to yourself.

= = = =

I’m going to miss my pile of kudos.

Positive feedback–what a breath of fresh air!

I live in a world of negative feedback. I suspect that I am not alone. What a pleasant thing it is to have a way for someone to tell you that you’ve done something that they appreciate.

Concept of the Virtual Fist

Filed under: General,Originally on TBD — DannyO @ 7:57 am

Is there anyone among us who hasn’t dreamed, at one time or another, of forming a musical group or other flavor of performing troupe?

When I was a boy, the boy next door received a drum kit from Santa for Christmas. Immediately, he, I, and two other denizens of the neighborhood laid intricate plans for a long and wildly successful career as the most popular rock band of our time. All we needed was a really good name. After several days of bickering, bargaining, and general bitching about it, we settled on the name “JEWL”, which was a combination of the letters from our names. (We combed the surrounding tract housing in desperate search for someone in our cohort whose name started with a second E, but failed.) And then the singer quit in disgust, leaving us with “JEW”, which probably wouldn’t have opened many doors for us. The band never really got off the ground, and it was over before I actually owned any instrument.

But I know it could have been different. If we’d just picked the right name, I wouldn’t be typing this right now. One of my groupies would be typing it, while I dozed peacefully on a mattress stuffed with thousand-dollar bills. After breakfast and snorkeling around the reefs of my private archipelago (formerly known as the British Virgin Islands), with as many supermodels as comfortably fit in my private jet, I would settle down to the task of finding an adequate repacement warm-up act for my yearly world tour–filling Michael Jackson’s shoes wouldn’t be easy. Maybe the Rolling Stones again, Aerosmith or Tom Petty? They all worked out pretty well in the past. Definitely not U2 or Madonna again.

Yes, this is exactly the way eleven-year-old boys think. Exactly.

So, what’s the name of your supergroup?

Mark Trost coined the name “Concept of the Virtual Fist” (it’s that little kudo-awarding icon at the end of every discussion post on TBD–soon to be lost forever, I’m afraid), and bequeathed it to me for this purpose in case I ever need it.

It’s better than anything I have laying around.

What about you?

July 11, 2009

Honestly, now

Filed under: Originally on TBD — DannyO @ 4:29 am

When pressed for specific details about the person behind my avatar, I have tended to demurely employ a combination of ambiguity and evasion, peppered with the occasional flat-out refusal. Nevertheless, I have shared many deep truths about my inner self over the last year: my longings, my desires, my lapses, my mistakes, my dreams and, of course, my love of nachos and my family.

I have never willfully lied or mislead anyone here. I wish I could say the same about the real world, but that would be a lie.

Several years ago, we hired some bozos to renovate our new house before we moved in. We gave them a set of keys to the house, which they kept hanging in a hook in the garage. The garage was protected by an electronic keyless entry system attached to the garage door opener. In order to avoid using their brains in any way, the workers wrote the combination on the wall next to the keypad–that way, no matter which crew arrived first at the house first in the morning, they could get into the garage and retrieve the key.

This worked fine until the day the workers tripped the circuit breaker for the garage, disabling the electronic lock. Without the key to the house, I couldn’t reset the breaker, but without resetting the breaker, there was no way to get the key, which was in the garage.

What to do, what to do?

This wasn’t the first time that these brainiacs had locked themselves out of the house. However, since they had just finished installing the new windows, the solution they had used at least twice previously–breaking a window–was deemed less than ideal.

To my good fortune, one of the window panes in the garage was broken. I couldn’t possibly fit through the small hole in the glass, but perhaps someone else could–someone who could navigate the inky darkness of the garage, release the latch on the door from the inside, and let me in.

Eureka! I sprang into action. Quickly trapping a bevy of squirrels, I crammed them into a wriggling sack and then shoved the writhing, chattering assemblage through the hole in the window, which I then adroitly covered with a board. Realizing that they had no other means of escape, the clever creatures worked as a unit to unlock the garage door from the inside and open the door. As they emerged from their dusty prison, I was waiting. I grabbed the door and disabled the lock. From there, the rest was easy.

Or so my daughters earnestly believe. The truth is somewhat less interesting, and does not involve squirrels.

I confess that may have embellished the story somewhat when I told it to them. I didn’t really want them to know how to break into the garage (and I certainly didn’t want to reveal to them that I am a mutant with telekinetic powers).

My children also believe in Santa, although they are beginning to suspect that there’s something funny going on.

What fibs have you told?

You don’t have to reveal the truth. Just share the lies.

July 9, 2009

She’s got a touch of Tuesday Weld

Filed under: General,Originally on TBD — DannyO @ 3:55 am

I suppose it’s a sign that life has been pretty good to me when I mention that one lingering disappointment I have is that that Donald Fagen hasn’t written and recorded a lot more music.

A second disappointment is that because of some combination of zealous lawyers and lack of appeal to the MTV generation, it’s difficult to find much of his work on youtube or any of the other places one can go to watch small, grainy, lo-fi videos of their favorite artists.

Fortunately, I found one elsewhere:

http://www.clevver.com/music/video/138545/donald-fagen-new-frontier.html

It’s not the one I was hoping for–I wanted to find “Trans-Island Skyway”, but I wasn’t able to find a good recording online. Perhaps you’ll be able; please post a link…

“Trans-Island Skyway” starts with a naked but surprisingly subtle riff and builds slowly to full orchestration; a perfect layering of several rhythms and harmonies. Like a fine mechanical watch, the exquisite complexity of the interrelationships of all the parts is implicit and all that one sees is the resulting piece of jewelry. The lyrics provide a human vision of the future, but the song ends abruptly without resolution.

“New Frontier”, in contrast, begins in full flight–in the video, as you will see, the music begins when someone turns on the radio–as if the music had already been playing, somewhere, for some time already. Instead of the future, it reviews one of the great struggles of our time: on one side, nuclear war, MAD, stifling conformity, stereotypes; while on the other side, progressivism, Kennedy, Brubeck, Picasso, Tuesday Weld… The fear that we would all die together as a race if we could not learn to live with and accept our differences, balanced against the optimism and idealism of the New Frontier.

“New Frontier” ends the way “Trans-Island Skyway” begins, but in reverse. There is a gradual peeling away of the layers until fewer and fewer remain. When you listen to the last minute of the song, you’ll hear what I mean. Finally, there is only one instrument, which, as if it suddenly realizes that it is alone, begins playing a new melody.

And this is pop music?

Who is your favorite undiscovered or unheralded genius?

What song sings to you?

July 4, 2009

Quench not the smoldering flax

Filed under: Originally on TBD — DannyO @ 2:38 pm

Of all of my teachers in junior high school, only one really had a lasting influence on my life (at least, in a way that I can recognize). At this remote time, I can probably only name a few of them, or what courses they took, but I’ll remember his name and what he taught until I don’t remember anything at all.

He was the music teacher. I took music lessons from him for several years, and played in the band. There are many stories I could tell about my days as an aspiring musician, but those are different stories, and music isn’t what this discussion is about.

He made posters with useful tips and advice and hung them all over the band room. They would change every few months. Wherever you were sitting, whether down front in the flutes and clarinets or back in the peanut gallery (the row in the back of the room composed of odd instruments for which there was only one player), several were in view.

I can’t remember any of them now, but I’m sure I’ve internalized them. Listen to yourself. Timing is everything. Practice. Enjoy the music you’re making.

But there was one poster that never changed. Written in smaller letters, and in a different hand than the others, this poster was hung at the back of the room, above the cabinets, out of the line of sight any of the students in the room. If you didn’t look up when you were racing to your seat at the beginning of class, there was little chance you would ever notice it.

Of course, since my attention is always wondering, I noticed it many times. But I had no idea what it meant, and I hated that.

Near the end of my last year in his school, curiosity finally overcame my timidity and I found the courage to inquire. At the end of class, I approached his podium and asked, “Sir, what does Quench not the smoldering flax mean, and why do you post it where it is so hard to see?”

He looked sheepish for a moment, but then the moment passed.

“Step up on the podium,” he suggested, “and take a look.”

From his raised platform, I could see the entire room spread out beneath me. From here, the poster was directly ahead of me, at eye level.

“That’s not part of your curriculum,” he explained. “That’s a reminder to me.”

What do you wish you could keep reminding yourself?

What should be written over your desk, on the background screen of your computer, on the dashboard of your car, over sink in the bathroom, or on the ceiling over your bed?

July 3, 2009

Ahead of its time

Filed under: Originally on TBD — DannyO @ 2:39 pm

Many years ago, I had an office in the Howard Hathaway Aiken Computation Laboratory on the campus of Harvard University. During my employment there, the building was demolished to make room for a much larger and more modern facility (renamed Maxwell-Dworkin, after the maiden names of the mothers of Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer, who donated the money for the new laboratory).

Aiken is a largely-unknown pioneer in computer architecture; many people have never heard his name, and yet anyone reading this posting is doing so via technologies he had a major role in developing. But perhaps the most obscure aspect of Aiken’s work is that he owed some of his key inspiration to work done by an even earlier pioneer who had been nearly forgotten by his time.

Aiken came to Harvard with a proposal to build a calculating machine–a machine that could be modified (or “programmed”, as we would say today) to perform arbitrarily complicated computations at the rate of dozens or perhaps even hundreds per second. It was perhaps the first design recognizable as a modern computer. Harvard turned down his initial proposal. When asked why, they told him that it was because they already had one.

And they did, or parts of one. After the death of Charles Babbage, another great pioneer, and a man who was far ahead of his time (his designs for his “Difference Engine” were unbuildable in his day, because contemporary machine tools were unable to build parts with the necessary tolerances–a hundred years later, the machines were built, and worked), his widow had tried to donate his writings and other work to various British Universities and other institutions, but had largely been met with indifference. Despairing, she boxed it all up and sent it to Harvard, where it sat in a storage room for many years, unused but unforgotten, until Aiken came along.

As Aiken read through Babbage’s writing, he was struck by an eerie feeling, as if, in his own words, “… Babbage was addressing [him] personally from the past”. Aiken always credited Babbage with much of his inspiration and many of his ideas.

Many years later, I walked through the Aiken Laboratory for a last time before the building was demolished. I wanted to salvage a piece of it to take with me. I found an old store-room in the basement, filled with boxes and odds and ends. Poking around, I found an ornate picture frame. Wiping the dust from the glass, I tried to make out what beneath. It was an old manifest, handwritten in a large, bold hand. It had faded considerably over time, and I had to take it into the light before I could make out what it said. It began:

“Contents of box: One piece, Difference Engine …”

I kept it in my office for many years. And I read Aiken’s work, and felt like he was speaking to me through the years.

When I left Harvard, I gave the frame to a junior professor. I hope it works for him.

Have you ever read something written by a stranger separated from you by time and experience, and felt that it could have been written directly to you?

July 1, 2009

A simple goal

Filed under: Originally on TBD — DannyO @ 2:46 pm

A few days ago, Robin Wolaner, the CEO of tbd.com, a social networking site for the 40+ crowd, announced that the site would be closing on July 13th.  Rather than simply letting the site go dark, she decided it would be better to let everyone know what was about to happen, so that all the members could move to other sites, or exchange contact info so they could keep in touch, and generally say goodbye.

I don’t want TBD to end yet, but people seem to be heading for the exits in droves already. I’m being completely honest when I write that the end of TBD may be the most emotionally significant event that’s happened to me since my youngest child arrived. It’s important to me to have this place as a sounding board for my ideas and to get positive feedback of the sort so freely given here. I haven’t felt this sense of loss since, well, I don’t know. Probably not since my dog was run over in 1979.

But enough about that…

There’s something I want to accomplish before it ends, and if I can accomplish it, then I will cry tears of bittersweet joy and loss.

I realize that by articulating my goal, I may make it impossible to achieve, or rob the moment of its spontaneity, but I cannot explain my feelings about the site without using it as an example.  Therefore I feel that I have to share this desire with you, as I have shared so much with the TBD members over the past year, and they, in their many ways, have shared so much with me.  Like all things on TBD, this is not something I can do alone. Nothing significant accomplished on TBD is done alone; it’s the dialog and interaction that makes it what it is.

So here it is.

Every once in a while, someone will post a question or a discussion topic, or someone will post a response to something, and I’ll make a joke or my best attempt at an insightful comment about it. And then, an hour, or a day, or in one case a few months later, I’ll get a personal message (the TBD equivalent of email) about it. The PM will say something to the effect of:

“What you wrote was so funny/enlightening that I had an epiphany/I spit coffee/soda/milk all over the screen and keyboard/woke up the neighbors with my laughter/pulled a muscle/wet myself.

“Thank you/I needed that/You made my day.”

I want to earn one more of those before it’s over. Just one.

It’s not going to be easy, given the diaspora of TBD members to EONS, facebook, ning, and others, but I’ll be watching for the opportunity.  And I’ll be archiving my PMs and collecting contact information.  These are people I don’t want to lose.

What about you? What do you still want to accomplish before the end–whatever end you’re facing?

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress