Words of Danny O'Bigbelly My idea of a good time

April 29, 2009

Missed opportunities

Filed under: General — DannyO @ 4:34 am

This weekend there will be a memorial service for the headmaster of my high school, on campus, as part of the alumni weekend. I will not be attending, for various reasons. If I was on campus this weekend, I’d certainly attend, from peer pressure as much as anything else, but it would feel odd to me. I don’t like funerals very much, and I never really knew this man very well to begin with.

The fact that I never knew him was a missed opportunity, or at least a regret. I’m not sure that I would have had any real chance to get to know him, but simply taking better advantage of the few opportunities when I might have interacted with him could have been very rewarding.

When I read his obituary, I realize that his life was, in many ways, my dream. The things he did, and the differences he was able to make in the school and the broader American educational system were the sort of things that I could fantasize myself looking back on with intense satisfaction, fulfillment, and pride, if things had worked out differently for me and I’d managed to find an academic post. It should be noted as an achievement of his school that in the three years I spent there, I went from having no particular ambition in life to desiring to become a teacher. In fact, my daydream goal was to return to my high school as a teacher–and I was not alone. Several of my classmates have confessed to having the same fantasy.

None of this was apparent at the time, of course. As a teenager, the headmaster was the symbol of authority and discipline, and authority and discipline are bitter enemies of teenage rebellion. As a newcomer to the school, I was impressionable and the disparaging or obscene nicknames the upperclassmen used consistently–it was very rare that, except in the presence of adults, anyone referred to him by his real name–made me think that perhaps he might be an awful person and that my best bet was to lay low and avoid any interaction with him. After all, unless you were in his class, or attended his teas (which required wearing a jacket and tie, which virtually guaranteed my absence), the only reason you were likely to have to interact with him personally were when he handed you your diploma during graduation, or if you were being kicked out.

What I knew about him I had learned from the school catalog, which had brief biographies for all of the masters, and a letter from the headmaster to the students (which was really meant for the parents and alumni) in the preface of the catalog, and his convocation addresses. I remember barely stifling a laugh when, during one address, as he was urging the students to branch out, to get involved in new things, and not just work on their grades (and grade grubbing), he used the metaphor of ‘workaholics’ in his prepared notes, but during delivery, the last instance of ‘workaholics’ was accidentally pronounced ‘alcoholics’. I don’t think anyone else noticed, except I did see some of masters perk up. Nobody else was paying enough attention.

I knew that he’d done something in the war that earned him a couple of medals, and I couldn’t ever remember seeing him blink. It seemed like his arms and legs were too long for his body, which gave him the sort of apparent clumsiness reminiscent of a gangly, awkward youth who had just gone through a growth spurt. He always seemed confident and alert, but he was never an attention seeker. I imagine that at a party, he’s the kind of person who would end up having an intense, hour-long, life-changing discussion about ‘The Golden Bough’ with someone while everyone else was getting drunk.

And then there’s this.

One evening, I attended a seminar given by some speaker on some subject–both long since gone from my memory–that he introduced. On the podium there was a pitcher of ice water and a few glasses, which the speaker could use to refresh his voice during the lecture.

The headmaster stood at the front of the stage, in front of the podium, looking out over the audience. It was a warm, humid day.  Behind him, the pitcher was sweating. As he began his introduction of the speaker, it began to slide along the podium on the thin film of water that had accumulated on the table. Slowly at first, and then gradually gaining speed, it reached the edge, and fell to the floor.

You can imagine a lot of ways this story might end, and I want you take a moment to imagine them.  It must have been something pretty good, because I still remember it, even though I’ve forgotten the name of the speaker and the subject of the talk.  So let your imagination run for moment. See what you can come up with.  Perhaps he was so startled by the crash of the pitcher that he jumped or fell off the stage. Perhaps the sound didn’t ruffle him at all and he continued on without skipping a beat. Perhaps he extemporized something incredibly witty about the incident and wove it seamlessly into his remarks. Perhaps he apologized for the absence of the pitcher to the speaker. Perhaps, after introducing the speaker, he ran across campus to the dining hall in order to get another pitcher of ice water for the speaker, sacrificing his dignity to be a good host.

Here’s what happened. I hope you won’t be disappointed.

After serving at the school for something approaching thirty years, the headmaster was so familiar and comfortable with his surroundings and his role that he appeared completely at ease. He had probably introduced a few hundred speakers by this point in his life. And yet he was still completely there and not just going through the motions on some sort of oratorical auto-pilot. He was in the moment. He was always in the moment.

As the pitcher began to move, it attracted the attention of the audience. He might have noticed that the eyes that had been watching him were now focused on something else. And when the pitcher tipped over the side, he might have heard the gasp (and the beginning of a laugh) came from the audience. However it happened, he was immediately aware that something was happening behind him.

Using some combination of the skills that had made him a squash star in college or earned him a Distinguished Flying Cross in the contested skies over Europe, he turned, lunged, and caught the pitcher before it hit the floor.

Rest in peace, Headmaster Bruce McClellan.

Annoying nightmares

Filed under: General — DannyO @ 1:37 am

I am awake at this obscene hour because of a nightmare. It’s a new one; I haven’t had this one before.

But before I tell you about this nightmare, I need to explain about my previous nightmares.  (I would write “my usual nightmare”, except that the  word “usual” might be interpreted to mean that it happens frequently, which is incorrect.  It’s a rare but repeated dream.)

I wonder whether anyone else has had this nightmare, or whether I’m just insane.

I’m running down a dark, dilapidated hall. Doors are everywhere, but all of them are locked. I know this without trying them.  None will open.  They are decoration.

I’m running as fast as I can (which in my dream is impressively fast, unlike real life).

I am running because I know that I am not alone.

There’s also monster in the hall with me. I can’t see much of it because the light is poor, but every once in a while, I catch a glimpse of part of it. It is huge and horrible. The building shakes under its massive footfalls.

At the end of the hall, there’s an open door. It is the way out.  It is the only way out.  When I see it, I try to increase my speed, knowing that something undesirable will happen if I don’t get to the door before the monster, but I’m already running flat out. I am afraid I will lose this race.  I’m doing everything possible to get to the door before the monster.  There is nothing more I can do, and it might not be enough.  If I trip or stumble over something hidden in the half darkness, I will lose.  Even if I do everything perfectly, I could still lose.  It will be close.

The monster also sees the open door. It lets out a bellow of rage so loud it raises dust, and shambles forward with a redoubled effort.  It has reserves, and I have none.  It never seems to falter or trip over the debris in the hall.  It accelerates.  The odds are getting worse by the second.

But the monster’s efforts are in vain.  Just as the monster reaches the doorway, I overtake it. It screams in terror as I tackle it and throw it to the floor. Just as I am about to throttle it with my bare hands, I always wake up in a cold sweat, with my heart racing.

After all, violence is the wrong way to solve problems — I’m a bad, bad person to treat any creature like that. I don’t even know why I’m chasing it.  There is never any motivation or back-story, just a chase.  I am wracked with guilt.

OK, so that’s the normal dream.  Told you I was weird.

Tonight was different.  No hall, but instead a maze, with infinite variation.  There are a million corners to hide behind.  And the monster is bigger than ever–how it fits into the hallways of the maze is a bit of a puzzle, but my dreams are not generally bound by the laws of logic or physics, so I don’t believe I can trap it in a tight corner.  It can go anywhere I can go, despite being forty feet long.

But we are not alone.  We are being watched, by thousands of spectators.  The maze is surrounded by some sort of stadium. This is a sport of some kind.  And all of the spectators are rabidly cheering for the monster.  They love the monster.  I have no idea why, especially considering that the monster occasionally plucks an adoring fan from the front row and eats him or her alive–but the empty seat is immediately filled by another cheering fan, and the game goes on without pause.

The monster and I stalk each other through the maze.  Sometimes I think I’m about to ambush the monster, only to find out that it is behind me.  Sometimes I manage to almost creep up on the monster as it is laying an ambush for me.  Nothing decisive happens.  Neither of us has a clear advantage.  I am a man with many frailties and the monster has home field advantage and is a cunning and tireless reptilian killing machine the size of a double bus.  It’s a well-balanced match and could easily go either way.

I am not enjoying this.  I don’t like fair fights.  I like my dreams to be a little more fun.

It probably has something to do with the current swine flu scare.  I have no fear of the flu for myself, but I fear for my friends and family.  It is a reminder that, unlike the world of my dreams, the real world contains monsters I can’t beat, and people I can’t protect.

April 24, 2009

The Wollyburble Challenge

Filed under: General — DannyO @ 5:46 am

I just goggled the word ‘wollyburble’ and found no hits.  Therefore, I’m going to claim it as my own word.  It will be interesting to see how long that lasts.

Yesterday I challenged some of my friends to provide topics for blog entries, since I was running short of ideas and since I hate the idea of painting myself into a thematic corner by having a biographic or topic-oriented blog (because this is the usual recipe for success in blogging, and I would hate to appear to be pandering my audience, assuming I ever have one).  They delivered, and I will begin working on them presently.

Some of the topics I don’t really understand, but that’s part of the charm.  In some cases, my essays may tangentially touch on the suggested topics, like the ramblings of a sophomore struggling to fill a blue book with bullshit about sociology in several chapters of a book that he hasn’t actually read, because he elected to spend the previous evening chatting up a charming red-head at a local watering hole instead of skimming quickly over the syllabus.  Although it is arguable that his sociology education was indeed furthered more effectively by his election to perform research in the field rather than the library, the full lesson will not dawn upon him until he learns that the charming red-head is the ex-girlfriend of his grader.  Such are the inflection points in our lives.

See what I mean?

If you wish to suggest new topics, please add them as a comment.

April 18, 2009

Racing improves the breed

Filed under: General,Originally on TBD — DannyO @ 6:32 am

PETAs recent position that the concept of purebred dogs is equivalent to racism is completely insane, of course, as most people have come to expect of PETAs positions.

But, like many crazy things, it has a kernel of quasi-truth to it. People are completely comfortable talking about the characteristics of different breeds of dogs (this breed is good with kids, that breed is a good watchdog, this other breed is pretty but stupid, that other breed does nothing but bark all day, and so on). You can look this stuff up. You can buy books that tell you what breed you should get, depending on your own personality and situation. Nobody, except PETA, thinks anything of this. There are no protests.

But it’s a small step from thinking that you can judge the character of a dog from its appearance to thinking that you can judge the character of a person from his or her appearance. And that, dear reader, is racism.

Of course, it’s a wrong step. People are not bred to have a particular appearance or character, while dogs are and have been selectively bred to reinforce certain characteristics for many hundreds of generations. Breedism is not racism.  Breeding is engineering.

In my own case, I can state categorically that red hair is not a by-product of a breeding program to create hyper-intelligence, nor is deep yellow skin a side effect of a breeding program to create the ultimate lover, just as bulging eyes and strong prescription glasses are not a side effect of the sarcasm gene. These are mere coincidences.

Changing the game

Filed under: General,Originally on TBD — DannyO @ 5:34 am

Every once in a while, someone comes along who not only excels at some sport (or art, profession, etc), but does so in a way that not only raises but redefines the game.

I was reminded recently of Bobby Orr, who redefined the game of ice hockey.

Orr’s early career sounds almost like the stuff of legend, but it’s all true. Spotted at the equivalent of a pee-wee hockey game by a talent scout who was at the rink to watch a later game of high-schoolers, Orr was first brought to the attention of the Boston Bruins coaches when he was eleven. By the time he was twelve, he had a contract to play professional hockey for the Bruins — as soon as he was old enough. At age fourteen, the Bruins arranged to have him play for a junior league team (18-20-year-olds) where, despite being the smallest player on the ice, he quickly made a name for himself. There was so much anticipation as Orr grew from a scraggly teenager into an adult that Orr was a superstar in the world of professional hockey before he played his first game as a Bruin, at the tender age of 18.

There was much skepticism that he couldn’t possibly live up to the hype. Stepping out onto the ice with legs that “felt like rubber”, Orr was terrified by the huge crowd before the game began. Nevertheless, he quickly found his rhythm and scored two goals and one assist in the first period. The skeptics were never heard from again. Despite a career shortened by injury, he went on to lead the Bruins (which had before been a lackluster team, to put it mildly) to two Stanley cups, and along the way he picked up nearly every major award in professional hockey, including leading the league in scoring for two years.

But I haven’t told you the game-changing part. Orr lead the league in scoring while he was playing defense.  In fact, his specialty was killing penalties, one of the most difficult assignments in hockey–and he would often change the apparent disadvantage into a scoring opportunity, as shown in what is considered to be one of the greatest goals in hockey: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lE9s_FaOFPM

The scoring records in hockey are all held by offense-oriented stars like the astonishing Wayne Gretzsky.  But true hockey fans understand the importance of the plus/minus statistic: the number of goals scored while a player is on the ice by the team of the player (plus) and the opposing team (minus).  It may seem impressive to score five goals in a game, but it’s less impressive if your opponent scores six.  On the other hand, it may seem lackluster to score only one goal in a game, but if your opponent scores none, you’ve still won.  Bobby Orr’s plus/minus per game is unparalleled.  When you consider this combined with the handicap of killing power plays, it’s even more impressive.  Bobby Orr’s best season plus/minus was 124 goals, the highest ever recorded, and he has three season plus/minus records in the all-time top ten.  No other player appears more than once in the top ten, and Wayne Gretzsky’s highest season plus/minus is 98, Mario Lemieux’s best season just edges out Orr’s rookie season at 55, and Gordie Howe never did better than 45.

Prior to Orr, defensemen were expected to play defense and forwards were responsible for scoring goals. Sure, a defenseman might score an opportunistic goal now and then, but their primary responsibility is protecting their own goal, not putting pucks into the other. Orr could do it all — kill power plays, defend his own goal, and score. Hockey has never be played the same way since.

And, of course, there’s the designers of the Porsche 917K, who forced racing officials to rewrite the rule book in order to permit any other car to be remotely competitive, but that’s another story…

Who is your game-changing legend?

April 6, 2009

Simplify, simplify

Filed under: General — DannyO @ 4:17 pm

It’s often hard to quantify, when it comes to recreation, the trade-off between the work or investment necessary to participate in some activity and the enjoyment (or other benefit) derived from that activity.  But once in a while it becomes obvious that something that used to be fun has simply lost its charm.

I am a member of a social web site, and for the last several months I have spent a considerable fraction of my discretionary time there.  I write short essays, or answer questions.  Sometimes my essays are serious, but usually they are essentially humorous, casual pieces.  Similarly, the answers may be serious (if the question is asked in good faith, and I have some clue how to answer it) or humorous (if the question is silly or the goal of the question is levity rather than enlightenment).  This was a lot of fun at first, because (somewhat to my surprise, given my training and profession) I am reasonably good at this.  My contributions were regarded as entertaining, witty, and generally a good read.  Besides the fun intrinsic in a creative act, who doesn’t like having their ego stroked by feedback like that?

But eventually both novelties wore off–first, the novelty that the other readers enjoyed in my writing, and later the novelty that I enjoyed by writing about different things.  I stopped getting responses to my writing, and I kept seeing the same questions over and and over and over again.

If my talent was more malleable, I suppose I could have adapted, but it isn’t, and I didn’t.  The character of the site was changing, in a direction that I didn’t want to go, and I could neither delay the change nor did I find the prospect of adapting appealing–assuming I was even able make the change.

That sounds very abstract.  Let me be more specific.  A few months ago, chances were excellent that when I was ready to log out at the end of a session, I would have at least one thing that I’d written that I’d want to share with my wife, because I thought it was good enough that she would find it amusing in some way.  I was proud of it and wanted to show it off.  The last week or so, however, I don’t think I’ve written anything worth forcing my wife to read, or anything really worth reading.  Instead, I’ve found myself becoming so bored with some of the unbearably repetitious or inane questions that I felt justified in answering them rudely, and so annoyed with some of the rude comments that I didn’t bother to address them at all.

If there’s one thing I don’t need, it’s something that aggravates me.  That’s why I go to work, and that’s why they pay me for it.  At home, I want something fun.

So this morning I walked away.  My account is still there, and anyone who wants to can find me easily enough if they want to stay in touch, but I’m not going to be contributing so often–perhaps not contributing at all, unless it really starts to look like fun once more.  I probably will check in every once in a while, just to see what kind of discussion topics are floating around, but I don’t have much optimism that things are going to change very much, or very quickly.

April 1, 2009

Bare or hair? A difficult dilemna

Filed under: Funny Stuff,General,Originally on TBD — DannyO @ 6:29 pm

After a recent heated and promising woo-making session was derailed by a lengthy emergency extraction procedure of one of my hairs from my wife’s teeth, my wife brought up the idea that perhaps I should consider shaving what I shall call, to avoid offending any readers with delicate sensibilities, the philtral region.

I’m not sure how I feel about this. I’ve heard that other men do this, and not just from stories–I’ve actually seen clean-shaven men. To be honest, the look appeals to me, but from what I’ve heard, it’s very high-maintenance. A friend of mine, who used to keep himself bare, said he had to shave nearly every morning, and even so, by the time evening rolled around and it was time for snuggle-play with his smoochy-woochy, there was enough stubble so that amorous inclinations of the angel of his dreams were severely attenuated by the ensuing abrasions. She confessed that it give her the sensation that she was making love to a belt sander–an unusually graphic and powerful metaphor from such a sweet, soft-spoken woman. In the end, he had to shave almost every time he wanted nooky, and the water bills alone were enough to make his mojo wane. In the end, it was too much. He hasn’t shaved for years, and both his marriage and his mojo seem to be firing on all cylinders.

I’ve also heard that there are issues with nicks and irritation. Believe me when I say that I don’t need any more irritation in my life, and nobody needs nicks. Since there’s no way I can possibly see what I’m doing without the aid of a mirror (my anatomy being what it is), such nicks seem inevitable, and I wouldn’t wish nicks in such a delicate area upon my worst enemy.

My wife also points out that I’ve come to expect her to be as smooth as a whistle–well, a whistle with a few exquisite wisps of hair–and she therefore believes that is only fair for her to expect the same from me. I don’t think this is fair at all, because I have never asked her to do this! It’s true that I was delighted to discover this facet of her physique at an early phase of our relationship, but it was fait accompli. While I genuinely appreciate the status quo, it is not something that I have ever explicitly asked her to do, and I believe (or like to believe) that I would love her just as much were things otherwise.

And so, gentle readers, I am torn. Should I shave off my mustache?

Oh, and I hope your April is starting off well.

Powered by WordPress