Words of Danny O'Bigbelly My idea of a good time

March 17, 2009

There are two acceptable answers to my question

Filed under: General — DannyO @ 5:07 pm

One of the basic truths about education is that if the student doesn’t have some idea what you are trying to teach, or what knowledge you have that would be of value to him or her, then they are not very likely to learn it.  They might learn something, and they might find it amusing, but it probably won’t be much help on the test or for the homework.  The correct framing of a lesson or a lecture is an essential part of the contract among the members of the class, which is a clear codification of the goals, methods, evaluation criteria, expectations, and syllabus–the student expects this from the students, and the students expect that from the teacher, and the test will have such and such format, and be worth so much of your final grade, etc.  I might write more about this on another day, but today I’m just setting the mood for the rest of the entry.

From the title of this blog, you know that I am going to ask a question, and that there are two acceptable answers to my question.  Your job is to figure out the question, and the two acceptable answers, before I reveal them.

Today I asked one of my co-workers if he knew how to use a certain technique to solve a problem we have.  It’s a relatively well-known technique, but “well-known” in this context means that many people know of this technique, but not everyone knows how to apply it.  I know of this technique, and have promised myself that someday I will learn it–in fact, several years ago, I bought a book about it, and then, several years later, after the first book had fallen out-of-date and been superseded by newer, better books, I bought one of those newer, better books.  I still have both of them, and they’re sitting right where I put them the day I brought them home from the book store,  unread and unopened.  But hope springs eternal.

My co-worker answered “no”, and the conversation moved on to other topics.  I still need to find someone who can solve the problem; perhaps I’ll get the opportunity to do it myself, if I can find a way to escape from the endless planning meetings I find myself stranded in more and more often.

I have heard an anecdote–whose provenance I have been unable to trace (it is attributed to many different people)–but that seems like a useful parable in my sort of work, where it is so very easy to get bogged down in the details (such as those contained in the dusty books on my shelves) and lose sight of the true goal, and where it is also so easy to get distracted by setting unrealistic or hopelessly optimistic plans that lack all necessary detail.  I will now relate it to you.

An architect is looking for workers to help construct a new building he has designed.  Lacking local connections, he knows nothing of the reputations of the construction companies in the area.  Desperate, he visits several construction sites, looking for good people.  He stops at the first site, where he sees a man digging a hole with a shovel, and asks the man what he is doing.  “I’m digging a hole, dumb-ass,” responds the man.  The architect moves on to the next site, where he sees a man hammering nails into a board, and asks him what he is doing.  “I’m nailing these two boards together, idiot,” says the second man.  Dismayed, the architect moves on to the third site, where he sees a man sweeping up sawdust, and asks him what he is doing.  “I’m building a cathedral,” responds the man with the broom.   “I would like to hire you, at a significant increase in salary and benefits,” answers the architect.

The most valuable people are those who can relate the minutia of their work to their goals, and accept the necessity of accomplishing all of the little things that are necessary in order to reach those goals.  It is not beneath a construction worker (or an architect, or a vice president) to sweep up sawdust; it has to get done.

Whether it is cost effective, and whether the customer will scream when he or she discovers that a vice president with a billing rate of hundreds of dollars per hour is sweeping the floor, is another question–but it is a question of economics, not pride, dignity, or necessity.

I am always looking for floor-sweeping cathedral-builders for my team, but they are few and always in great demand, and so I usually have to be content with people who are talented at sweeping (like me) or people who have a grand and glorious vision and the ability to convincingly articulate it to our customers–an extremely valuable set of skills, without which my company would have no customers, and therefore I mean them no disrespect.  (Quite the contrary; it’s a skill I simply don’t have, and the people who do have bigger offices and much bigger paychecks than I do, so I would love to have it.)  But a person in my position, which is that of keeping the promises that the visionaries have made, needs all the cathedral builders available.

After talking to my co-worker, I realized that he was not going to be of any help in solving the particular problem I need to solve, but it was worse than simply that.  I began to wonder whether he was going to be much use in helping me solve any of other problems I have on my ever-growing list.  I was very concerned about his answer.

Let us consider some of the answers he might have given, and why he might have given them.

He might have said “no”, even though the truth was “yes”, simply to avoid the work or get me out of his office.  This would have made me question whether he really had any commitment to the group, and would effectively end our relationship.

He might have said “yes”, even though the truth was “no”, in order to get this plum assignment (you never know what someone will consider a plum…) and then throw my planning into disarray with slipped schedules and slipshod work as he tried to cover up and correct his ignorance.

So what answers are acceptable?  Consider the cathedral builder.  When you’re building a cathedral, and someone asks you whether you’ve figured out how to put on the roof–a problem that cannot be avoided–there are really only two answers: “yes“, and “not yet“.

March 12, 2009

Not a chapter from the Bodhicharyavatara

Filed under: General — DannyO @ 4:25 pm

A few years ago, I was in a college dining hall, and a student organization was selling T-shirts to support themselves.  They didn’t actually have the T-shirts on-hand, however. They took your name and money and then, a few days later, after they had enough people lined up to make a cheap bulk purchase from the manufacturer, they would send in their order, and then, at some point in the future, they would call you or send you an email to tell you to come pick it up. This is not a scam; the story doesn’t end after they take your money and vanish. They’d been doing this for years, and everyone got their shirts; no problems. But one student was concerned. He wanted his shirt by a particular date, for some irrelevant reason, but the sellers simply couldn’t make any commitment.

It was at this point that I leaned over and said to my dinner companion, who had been watching this exchange with me, and said “When the student is ready, the T-shirt will appear.”

I probably should have asked if he was Buddhist first, but I doubt I would have made any difference.  It was going to come out of my mouth anyway.

And that, my friends, is just one of the very many reasons why I will be reincarnated as a potato bug in my next life.  If I’m lucky.

March 8, 2009

Bathroom talk

Filed under: General — DannyO @ 1:11 pm

Parts of my house seem to defy simple explanation, although perhaps the simplest explanation is the best–whoever did the penultimate remodeling (before we started our eternal process) was blind. It is conceivable. There are many small clues, like the fact that the lumber markings on the wood used to build some of the bathroom cabinets can be clearly read (very clearly read) because they are on the outside surface and preserved behind a very light stain. Usually furniture-grade lumber is not marked, and usually diligent workers put the good face of each piece outward, suggesting that this is crappy wood that was nailed in place by careless workers who couldn’t see their own work.

The kitchen counter is a similar story. It appears to be supported by paranormal forces. There’s certainly nothing physical holding it up, and yet it can support the weight of a dancing nine-year-old. The marble just wants to be where it is, and gravity be damned.

But I digress.

Friday was already going to be a busy day, but it got busier when the flush handle unexpectedly broke off the toilet, bouncing along the floor tiles with a loud clang whose echos were chased by an expletive chosen hastily and without conscious effort from my deep reserve of casual, everyday profanity.  It’s the sort of combination of sounds that makes my wife yell, from whatever part of the house she’s in, “Is everyone OK?” with a low expectation of a positive response.

Such was my introduction to the secret world of toilets that have the flush handle on the side, instead of the front. I now understand the difference between the two mechanisms, and can fully appreciate the inexorable truth that all such toilets will break eventually, at least if they are equipped with the sort of flush handle assembly sold at Ace or Home Depot. Side-handle toilets are simply a bad design. Front-handle toilets are the way to go. If you look at it, you’ll see what I mean. I’m not going to bother describing it, because you can probably get your hands on a side-handle toilet and play with it yourself. There’s simply too much torque on the pivot for the pivot housing to be made out of plastic, but plastic is the material from which they are made.

The evidence is clear at the hardware store. Although the majority of toilets have a front flush handle, it is very difficult to find a replacement front handle. This is because they do not break. In contrast, it is very easy to find a replacement side flush handle, even though side flush handles are rare, because being broken is apparently one of the common states of a side flush handle.

I installed a new handle, adjusting the action a bit so that in the future, only one turn of the knob should suffice to accomplish a flush, and significantly less jiggling will be required–perhaps even none at all–in order to end a flush.

But looking inside this toilet I was, once again, amazed at the simplicity of the overall device and the elegance of the mechanism. True, as a fifty-year-old toilet, it does appear, from certain angles, to have been assembled from spare parts by a lesser student of the Rube Goldberg school of engineering, but in reality every piece is necessary and they all work together in glorious concert. It is a wonderful machine that improves my life every single day.

Well, except for that day last summer when it decided to imitate a fountain. That particular day may have been a net loss. But on every other day, I’m very happy that my home has a toilet.

March 5, 2009

Through the post

Filed under: General — DannyO @ 4:45 am

Yesterday an unfamiliar catalog arrived; it is from a nursery that sells various seeds and seedlings through the mail.  My wife flipped through it, mentioning this and that, with oohs and ahs over some of the pictures.

I haven’t looked at it yet.  I am afraid.  To me, all catalogs are somewhat like pornography, and take my mind to a weird place where I imagine how my life would be different if the objects shown inside the catalog were present and available to me in my everyday life.  I can spend a happy hour with a catalog from an office supply store, thinking of fun things I could do with, for example, twenty-five pounds of manila envelopes or a box of green hi-lighters.  A wine and cheese catalog is more exciting to me than a catalog from Victoria’s Secret or Frederick’s of Hollywood because I know that the models, who are essential to most fantasies about the successful use of their offerings, are not included with every piece of lingerie.  With the wine and cheese catalog, on the other hand, I know that if I order something, then when it arrives everything I need will be in the box.  In contrast, the Victoria’s Secret catalogs should include a warning, saying “Claudia Schiffer not included.  Your wife may legally refuse to wear anything you buy from us.   Professional models used on a closed course.  Don’t try this at home, kids!”  The Victoria’s Secret catalog may be excellent fapping material, for those who prefer such form of fapping fodder, but it offers a fantasy that can’t be made real, at least not in the O household.  It might be different if I was married to a svelte twenty-year-old fashion model, or at least someone who would even consider wearing a thong, but that’s not how things shook out.

I’ve been starting to think about what to plant in the garden this year, so this catalog is full of temptations.  To sweeten the deal, they are offering $25 off my first purchase–if the first purchase totals less than $25, it’s free.  This sounds like Claudia Schiffer telling me she’ll let me kick the tires for free, knowing full well that she’ll get it back, and more, during the test drive.

I do want some sort of flowering bush or climbing vine I can use to make a border along the back wall, so I will be scanning through the catalog later, hopefully with adult supervision.   The difficulty of finding the proper plant is that there is an enormous tree that shades this wall most of the day for all of the Summer and Fall.  I don’t know why, but things that flower seem to typically require a lot of sunlight, and sunlight is something our yard generally lacks.  The trees are beautiful–I can’t complain about that–but they do limit my options.

Time will tell if the catalog is full of dry facts and figures, or whether it’s the Victoria’s Secret of garden catalogs, showing only the finest specimens, photographed in perfect light and weather, posed in the carefully manicured garden of a regal manse.  In that case, it will just be gardening pr0n, and I should be able to resist it without effort.  If it tells me things like soil type, sunlight indices, temperate zones, growth and spread rates, and proper fertilizer mixes and watering regimen for optimal growth and flowering, then I’m doomed.

March 4, 2009

Airlifting posts

Filed under: General,Opinion — DannyO @ 5:01 am

Last summer I discovered “tee-bee-dee” (aka “TBD”), a social web site for the 40-plus crowd, and have spent a considerable amount of time posting there.  It’s a pleasant site and has a unique character, but it seems to have developed a few personality quirks.  Perhaps these are simply an inevitable reflection of human nature, but I would hope not.

When I say that I’ve observed something (for example, “a few personality quirks”), I don’t mean to imply that my observations should be treated as fact.  When it comes to human nature, I’ve always been at a marked disadvantage.  Nevertheless, I have observations, and I have opinions about those observations, and I have a blog, so of course I’m going to write down those opinions, supported by whatever random anecdotes I choose to cherry-pick and seem to bolster my case.

My frustration with TBD is that the vast majority of the members (where by “vast majority” I mean “nearly everyone I’ve met, but I haven’t met everyone, so I hold out hope that there are more exceptions hiding somewhere”) are either unwilling to discuss anything interesting on a personal level, or are unable to discuss anything personally important without becoming defensive and/or offensive.  Here are the templates for the two canonical discussions:

Discussion Response Type 1:

  • Discussion leader: “Please share your opinions or experiences about X.”
  • Participant: “Good morning everyone–and how is everyone?  We’re having nice weather here.  Does anyone want coffee?  I’m having pancakes for breakfast.”

Discussion Response Type 2:

  • Discussion leader: “Please share your opinions or experiences about X.”
  • Participant: “I think Y about X.  If you disagree, you’re wrong, stupid, and evil.  It’s that simple.  It’s so obvious that it’s not worth my time to clearly articulate Y or defending my position.  You probably could not understand anyway, since my intellect occupies a different plane than yours.”

It’s impossible to know (at least for me to know–you might have figured all of this out) whether the participant in the first discussion type responds in this matter because:

  1. They can’t be bothered to think about X and just want to chime in.
  2. They didn’t bother to read the discussion header and just want to chime in.
  3. They don’t have any opinion about X and just want to chime in.
  4. They are afraid that the topic is controversial and don’t want to provoke a type 2 digression, but they want to chime in.
  5. They don’t like the person who started the discussion, or the topic of discussion, and desire to throw the discussion off the rails.

I believe these are sorted from most frequent (#1) to least frequent (#5), but of course that’s just my belief.  I don’t have any data, or even anecdotes to cherry-pick.

Response motivation #5 is really divided into two subcategories: a special case of response type #2 (the responder believes that it is heresy to even ask the question), and the second is a passive-aggressive approach to controlling the discussion topics by exasperating discussion leaders.  This may seem a little paranoid–and who knows, it might actually be paranoid–but since there are people who publically brag about doing each of these, the idea has certainly come up.

But those are just my opinions.  I’m not going to defend them, but I’m also not going to claim that if you disagree then you’re stupid, wrong, or evil if you disagree, or claim that my intellect is on a different plane than yours.  I know my intellect is still half-asleep this morning, and even at the height of its powers is confined to the right lane of the information superhighway, hazard lights blinking.

But now we leave the realm of opinion and enter the domain of fact, and finally get to the point.  I’ve airlifted a bunch of my postings over from TBD, and will continue to do so (at least, as long as I keep writing this type of entry on TBD), to preserve them and isolate them from their natural surroundings.  Uninfluenced by the responses in their original rich matrix of profound and thoughtful (as well as inane, profane, and insane) responses, you can form your own opinion about them.

My postings are the dusty windshield of a car parked too long at the side of the road, and you are the index finger of a 15-year-old boy filled with creative and harmless mischief.  The moving finger writes, and having writ, moves on, and then waits nearby for reaction from any accidental audience, hoping for a laugh.

A long winter

Filed under: General,Originally on TBD — DannyO @ 4:30 am

Winter got started early in the Northeast this year, giving us a white Christmas with plenty of surplus. It’s usually fairly dry in November and December, and with a lingering warmth despite the frost, so having a white Christmas, much less the remnants of several snow storms on the ground at Christmas, is a bit unusual.

And the winter has continued at the same pace, bringing snow at regular intervals, sometimes only enough to dust the lawn and require scraping off the cars, but sometimes, like this past Monday, adding a fresh thick blanket of more than a foot. I don’t think the yard has been clear of snow more than twice since mid-December, and the place where I heap the snow from the back steps, which is in nearly perpetual shadow, has never completely melted.

Looking on the weather map, there are several warmer days ahead, but it’s uncertain whether these will be enough to melt the accumulation from the last several days. It may be weeks yet before the snow is completely gone.

Although it has been snowy, it hasn’t been a very harsh winter–we’ve had relatively few days of wind and bitter cold, and I’m sure that folks from colder environments are laughing at the idea of seeing their lawns until Easter, but then again, they don’t live in the Northeast, and aren’t waiting with growing impatience for the advent of the glory of a New England (or even a New Jersey) Spring.

It’s only the beginning of March, but I am restless already. I am waiting for Spring, with plans of plantings and gardening and thoughts of adding a new trellis or two.

Why are you looking forward to Spring, and how are you preparing?

February 25, 2009

The problem with everything

Filed under: General — DannyO @ 8:11 pm

I work in an scientific discipline closely related to engineering.  This means that I am expected, in the course of my research, to actually build things.  I create artifacts, but things that tangible, not just a set of equations or a theory.  (of course the sets of equations and theories are the lofty goals of my work, but in order to get there, apparatus needs to be built, experiments run, etc)

This is the problem with everything.  Not just my work, but huge swaths of the current world.

It used to be possible for two guys to change the world by building something, over the course of a few weeks or months, in their garage, on a shoe-string budget.  This is becoming increasingly difficult, and in my field, it may be virtually impossible at this point.

When I was starting out, I could take ideas from conception to delivery.  One person could do it all.  This is no longer possible; it takes a team of people years of work and bags of money to produce a new product that is just an incremental improvement over the current state of the art.  It hardly seems worth the effort, and that’s the crisis.

The amount of time and energy it takes to build new things in my field has surpassed the limits of sustainable enthusiasm.  It takes so much time, effort, and sacrifice to make a difference that it’s hard to summon the passion necessary to make the commitment.  In short, the fun is gone.

February 20, 2009

Gouts of blood

Filed under: General,Originally on TBD — DannyO @ 6:38 am

You might think that after thirty years of shaving, I would have learned how to avoid nicking that little spot under my nose, the spot where most of the blood in my body apparently congregates when it has nothing better to do.

It would be reasonable to think that. Nobody would fault your mind for harboring such a thought.

But you would be wrong.

February 8, 2009

Gotcha!

Filed under: General,Originally on TBD — DannyO @ 6:15 pm

Several years ago, when my wife and I were visiting China, doing some touristy stuff, and traveling to one of the more out-of-the-way cities, we were lounging in our hotel room when we were unexpectedly roused from our groggy jet-lagged daze by a soft knock on the door. I opened the door, and a young woman I’d never seen before and whose name I was never able to learn gently handed me an infant girl and a small envelope of papers. And then, before we could fully grasp what was happening, she was gone. I don’t think we ever saw her again.

The infant was dressed in several layers of clothing–all her worldly possessions, it turned out. She was perspiring from wearing so many clothes and appeared unhappy and confused. There was no question that she was somewhat ill. There was also no question that we were a little bit unprepared for this.

But not completely unprepared. We’d been waiting for this day for a very long time. All the paperwork had been done and all the forms had been filed. We had diapers, wipes, formula, new clothing, an assortment of toys, medicines, remedies, and gadgets. We’d read the books. We had a lot of facts. But this was reality. It tastes and smells a lot different.

The day the baby is given to his or her “forever family” is called “Gotcha Day.” I’m not sure who is the subject and who is the object of that gotcha. There are convincing arguments for several different interpretations.

How did having children change things for you?

If you don’t have any children, perhaps you know people who do, or remember stories from your parents about how you changed their lives.

February 2, 2009

What are they thinking?

Filed under: General,Originally on TBD — DannyO @ 6:17 pm

They had been orbiting above the wreckage for fifteen minutes but had seen no sign of life. They had watched as Broderick Weltswell, crippled with wing problems, had attempted an unpowered emergency landing on the short ribbon of thin flat road below, only to be hit twice more as he glided in. They had watched helplessly as the uniformed enemy cautiously but inexorably approached the wreckage.

Reginald Thipset, flight leader, didn’t believe that Broderick was still alive. Three thoughts flitted through his mind: he would never see Broderick again; he was going to have to write very painful letter upon return to base; and that the return to base was becoming more perilous by the moment.

The sky flared red in the west, but gloom was gathering in the east, the direction home. The night sky was not safe. “Just once,” thought Reginald, “I’d like to be able to enjoy a sunset instead of turning away and fleeing.”

His revere was broken by a sudden squack over the flight channel from his wingman. “Sir, there’s nothing we can do here. The sun is setting. We need to leave now.”

Reginald considered his dwindling options and made a difficult choice. There was no time to take the approved route. “Form up and follow me. We’re going down on the deck. We’re taking a shortcut through the hills.”

There was no protest. His flight trusted him. Good.

The flight followed Reginald through the hills, following the terrain, so low they were often flying between the trees. Reginald saw the startled faces of children playing in a yard of a small house turn and follow him as flew past. It was a reminder that they were flying within easy small arms range of hundreds of the enemy, but he knew that they had little to fear. Flying this low, through the wooded hills, meant that the chance of anyone even getting off a shot was negligible. Reginald had never heard of it happening. Not here. But they’d be over the flats soon.

Reginald didn’t flinch as his threat detector screamed a warning. They were passing over an old “Big Eye” site. It always made the threat detector go off, but Reginald and his flight knew that it just a beacon, left behind like a scarecrow, to frighten anyone flying overhead. Whoever was operating the site had never sent anything up after them, but being watched so intently, even by impotent eyes, still sent a chill down Reginald’s back. But at the same time it comforted Reginald to pass it by, because it was a landmark on the way home.

Then they were over the flats, an immense alluvial plane that had been cleared of nearly all trees by generations of farmers. Flat and featureless, with no vegetation taller than a stalk of rice, it was the last barrier. Flying low through the hills had kept them safe, but flying low here was dangerous. They were exposed here, horizon to horizon. There were stories about entire flights decimated in the blink of an eye over the flats.

“Feet wet in forty seconds,” announced Reginald to the flight, trying to sound reassuring. Over the water they’d be safe. The seconds ticked by. Reginald realized he was holding his breath. He could see the shore, and then it was behind them.

The sky behind them was fading to ochre and the water looked black beneath them. They were over the water. Reginald relaxed. In a few moments, they set down, rejoining the rest of the flock paddling around Fresh Pond in Cambridge. It was just another day in the life of a Canadian Goose.

What do you think animals think about?

February 1, 2009

A word of advice

Filed under: General — DannyO @ 8:59 am

The internet is populated by many frauds and charlatans.  This is a well-established fact.  Therefore, I’m not going to give you any information here about myself.  Instead, I’m going to give you some advice.

Ignore any and all of the information offered to you directly and without solicitation, and don’t solicit information from strangers unless you have a way to verify the integrity of the information by a separate mechanism.  When an anonymous stranger writes information in his or her blog or web site, there is little hope that you will ever know whether that information is factual, an exaggeration, a joke, or a deliberate and calculated attempt to deceive.  That doesn’t mean that it’s a lie, or that it’s incorrect, or any of those things.  But a wise person should be aware that it might be.

The one thing that is true–but unfortunately it’s not a simple truth–is that you can tell a lot about a person not so much by what they write but what he or she chooses to write about and how he or she expresses his or her thoughts.   For example, I could mention that I’m a curmudgeonly, forty-something, overweight guy.  I might be telling a complete lie–I might actually be a sweet, beautiful nineteen-year-old girl with nothing but romance on her mind (although this would be the opposite of the way things usually work, from what I’ve heard).  You don’t know.  You might never know.  But two things you do know are that I want you to think of me as a curmudgeonly middle-aged guy, and that somewhere I picked up the word curmudgeon and thought this would be a good time to show it off.

I grant you that this probably isn’t very useful information, but it’s 100% accurate.  So just preface all my statements with “The author wants me to believe that” and you’ll be OK.

Of course, I might just want you to think that I’m giving you good advice, while in fact the advice is terrible.  You’re going to have to figure that out for yourself.

Now we get to the complicated bit.  While you are worrying about me being a fraud and/or charlatan, I also have some doubts about you.  I’m sorry, but since the door is always open on my blog, I don’t really know who is going to come wandering in, and therefore I must be somewhat on my guard.  Some of you are simply anonymous strangers–or, as I like to say, anonymous, faceless friends I haven’t met yet and probably never will outside of cyberspace.  Some of you are actual friends from the real world, or both the real world and cyberspace.  The better you know me, the easiest it will be to tell when I’m lying or distorting the truth.

I’m planning to lie or distort the truth quite frequently on this blog, but only in very specific ways, primarily in order to protect the particulars of my identity, and personal information of myself, my family and relatives, and loved ones.  For example, if I make a blog entry telling the story of some shenanigans that my daughter and her best friend Helen had as they walked down Sherman Street on their way to school, you can be sure of two things–the name of my daughters best friend is not Helen, and she doesn’t walk down Sherman Street on her way to school.  Perhaps I don’t even have a grade-school-aged daughter at all, although it would be profoundly strange for me to write so many blog entries about an entirely fictional character.

I may also exaggerate or distort the details of some events in order to increase the entertainment value of a story.  For example, it simply sounds more interesting and literary to say that my wife’s snoring sounds like an unmuffled, rusty chainsaw being used to cut through a jersey barrier during a thunderstorm, when in reality her snoring more accurately resembles the sound of a well-maintained chainsaw being used to clear-cut a forest of young, supple pine trees on a sunny spring day.  Perhaps the tendency to embellish and tweak simply runs in my family; for example, the stories my mother tells about me as a baby keep getting more and more interesting (and embarrassing) with each passing year.  When I was a teenager my mother used to tell my prospective girlfriends that once I ate a dog biscuit (because all evidence suggested that the culinary tastes of our dog and my personal tastes were highly congruent, and therefore something so immensely enjoyed by the dog must be worth a try), but now, some three decades later, the story has grown in richness and my wife has been informed that dog food was my staple food as a boy.  In any case, I consider this sort of fibbing as an element of poetic license, so you might as well get used to it.

A third situation that leads to the appearance of lying is that sometimes I simply get the facts wrong, in which case I don’t even know that I’m lying.

If you catch me intentionally lying, or accidentally telling the truth, I would appreciate it if you just kept it to yourself.

January 31, 2009

On-air fantasies

Filed under: General,Originally on TBD — DannyO @ 6:13 pm

Back when I used to watch TV with any regularity (back before children, etc) one of my favorite shows was the morning financial report (I think that’s what it was called) on CNN with Deborah Marchini and Stuart Varney. I think it stopped airing at least ten years ago, but I still miss it.

One of the reasons that I used to enjoy it because I thought that Deborah was hot. Not so much her looks (which were just fine) but her voice and her playful inflection. I was pretty sure that female viewers would feel the same way about Stuart. And maybe there was a little something going on between them? They seemed to be having an awfully good time.

I also really enjoy listening to Laura Carlo on WCRB (Boston’s classical musical station, now also serving Cape Cod and the Islands on …) and Bob Pleasants on WUMB (folk music radio) because their voices have such amazing character.

I suspect that Laura Carlo could seduce me in thirty seconds over the phone. It’s like an acoustic pheromone or some such phenomenon. There’s never anything overtly sexy or flirty in her voice — it’s purely professional — but I know that if she ever ended her introduction of a piece with something like “This is really long one, and it gets so lonely here in the station… first man here can have me for thirty minutes” there would be a thousand men reaching for their car keys before the conductor raised his baton.

And there’s something so calming and peaceful about Bob Pleasants voice that I’m amazed it’s available without a prescription.

I made the terrible mistake of going to their stations web sites to make sure that I’d spelled their names correctly and now I know what they actually look like (or their press kit photos, anyway). I’d always imagined Laura to look more like Deborah Marchini, but with darker hair. And Bob Pleasants I imagined like Stuart Varney, but with a pony tail and three-days growth of beard. I was wrong. Dang.

So, who are your favorite on-air personalities, and what do you imagine about them?

Anyone who appears in People Magazine or other similar publications is ineligible; you already “know” too much about them. This is about what’s going on in your head, not about what you read in Tiger Beat or Vogue

January 30, 2009

Forgotten treasures

Filed under: General,Originally on TBD — DannyO @ 5:30 am

Every once in a while, I’ll come across something so notable on the internet that I feel I have to bookmark it so that I can come back and look at it again later or share it.

Let’s start with something mundane, from several years ago:

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/276/2499/1600/freshsalad.jpg

This may be my first exposure to the genre of a photo with something circled and/or arrowed with a “wtf?” inscription. It certainly wasn’t the last.

And there was a link to different crazy vending machines, which is now dead, but I found something like it via google:

http://www.photomann.com/japan/machines/index.htm

I find it somewhat disturbing that alongside the vending machines for kerosene and pr0n, the author lists an honor-system vegetable stand as a crazy idea. Huh? Is there any other way to buy fresh vegetables? Whoever this guy is, he’s clearly never been to farm country.

And here’s a link from much more recently: a David Byrne video that involves a bunch of people getting naked and dancing around in the nude. But fear not–no naughty bits are shown! Your innocence will not be corrupted by watching this video. It’s all censored. Without the censorship, this video would have no purpose. Explaining any more will spoil the surprise. Watch it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IyJR7QlRhM4

If you didn’t smile at that, we need to talk.

I don’t have any memory of how I found this–probably someone sent me a link:

http://www.zenbydesign.com/newchair/tantra.html

Has anyone seen one of these in the real world? How many do you think they’ve sold? But don’t you want one now? Be honest. Aren’t you already thinking of how you’re going to explain this contraption when Aunt Millie comes over for tea? It’s not the kind of thing you can hide in your nightstand.

Personally, I think this looks like it could be fun, except for the fact that I’m married to a woman who can’t look at it without giggling. Plus the kids would probably use it as a jungle gym.

In case you ever need some avant-garde Tees, these guys will fix you up:

http://www.threadless.com/

Lovely stuff.

I’ll always have a bookmark or two for this, just in case:

http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/video/whitenerdy

Most of the links in by bookmarks are dead. Oh, well.

So, what about you? What forgotten treasures or eclectic crap do you have bookmarked? What seemed worth a second look?

January 29, 2009

A story about blackberries

Filed under: General,Originally on TBD — DannyO @ 9:01 am

If this seems familiar, it’s because I’ve cut and pasted it from another site where I used to post stuff like this…

When I was a small lad, growing up in rural nowhere, the meadow next to the house had an enormous blackberry patch at one end. At least half an acre of twisted vines.

If you have never picked blackberries, you can try to imagine their vines as the bastard offspring of roses, wild grapes, and poison ivy. Twisted, intertwined, thorny, six feet tall, and nasty. But covered with sweet, sweet berries.

After the berries around the perimeter have been harvested, the only way to access the interior is by carefully unbraiding the vines and then holding them apart and then entering the core. This can be done by a six-year-old child wearing nothing but shorts and flip-flops — the flip-flops being necessary to shield ones feet from the runners on the ground, and to hold down some of the branches. It’s slow work, but since it takes a while to pick a branch clean, not too tedious.

On a bright June day, dressed in nothing but the aforementioned shorts and flip-flops, bucket in one hand, I entered the patch and began to work my way inside, filling my bucket. As I released the vines, they closed behind me. After 30 minutes or so, I could no longer see my friends who had come picking with me, and I had somewhat lost my bearings. But no worries. I couldn’t be more than two hundred yards away from my house, and if I got stuck, I could call for help and someone would find me. It had happened before.

It was a beautiful day, and blackberries were filling my bucket and my stomach, and I was seeing the inner core of the field for the first time. Strange things lived here — things I didn’t know lived so close, but were kept safe from predators by the nearly impenetrable thicket of thorny bramble. I startled pheasants — and they startled me, bursting up from the ground, their wings whistling. I found rabbit burrows and other burrows — woodchucks? badgers? I’ll never know.

This was all wonderful. I started to sketch out plans for a secret hideout for me and my friends, a clubhouse safe forever from the frightening and cootie-infested girls across the street.

That’s when I stepped on the beehive. But I didn’t realize it right away.

First one bee started pestering me. Not unusual — bees tend to think that redheads are some sort of exotic flower, so I get confused bees pestering me all the time. But then it was two bees, and then it was four, and then it was five billion bees.

This was unwelcome news. We had Africanized bees in the neighborhood — or so we all believed. We knew they’d been killing our cats, anyway. I don’t really care much about the ethnic origins of bees; I just care whether they have an established pattern of stinging things to death.

I weighed my options and made a difficult decision. I made it very quickly. I don’t know what happened next — I have no memory of the thirty seconds it must have taken to retrace my steps. My next memory is running, blood streaming behind me, empty handed and bare footed, up to the kitchen screen door, and slamming it shut behind me, having outrun the main host of bees.

I remember my mother looking somewhat annoyed that I was bleeding all over the linoleum, but then thinking better of sending me back outside. Then I remember her calling the neighbors and asking them to send over as much first aid cream as they had, and call around for more.

My bucket and flip-flops were never found.

Surprisingly, my wounds were superficial and I didn’t get that many stings — maybe a dozen. Perhaps something was looking out for me that day. My injuries weren’t nearly as bad as the time I met a strange cat and somehow decided that it really wanted to be picked up and petted — but that’s another story.

January 28, 2009

Remembrance of things past, or something like that

Filed under: General,Originally on TBD — DannyO @ 5:37 am

What do you know you have forgotten?

  • The name of the kid who sat next to you in fourth grade?
  • The phone number you had in college?
  • Which aunt gave you which crystal vase as a wedding present?

I know I knew the answers to those inquiries, but I know I don’t know the answers now nor shall anon. With each passing year, I seem to remember remembering things more than I remember things.

For example, I know I saw the movie Xanadu when it came out. And I know at least seven other people saw it–I counted. But now, other than the fact that it involved roller skating, disco, Gene Kelly, Olivia Newton-John, ELO, and the Tubes (how could it not have been memorable?) I can’t really remember much about it, and neither can anyone else I’ve asked.

But it wasn’t until I saw this clip that I realized how much I’d forgotten: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7m1UWSD-FaA

Weird Al dancing on a tightrope? A troupe of dancing mimes? Electric blue pirate shirts? Olivia dressed as Ming the Merciless? How could this not have been memorable?

It’s enough to make me think seriously about holing up in a cork-lined room for a few years to jot down what I still do remember, before the rest of it is gone for good.

What about you? What do you remember remembering, and remember no more? And do you miss it?

January 18, 2009

I like jerboas

Filed under: General,Originally on TBD — DannyO @ 5:44 am

I’ve tried so many times to tell you all, but at the last minute, I’ve always chickened out. But here it is: I like jerboas. I think they’re pretty neat. They’re my favorite burrowing animal.

I realize that in popular culture, there are many rumors and mistruths out there about what jerboas are and what they do. Perhaps an honest and frank discussion will help you to understand jerboas, and learn to live and work side-by-side with the jerboaphiles in your community. (Someone you know–perhaps someone you love–likes jerboas. There are more of us than most people guess.)

Jerboas are small burrowing animals that appear, at first glance, like a sort of mashup of a mouse and a kangaroo. There is a similar creature, the “kangaroo rat”, that shares many of its characteristics. Some people consider these names synonymous, but I do not believe this to be accurate.

Jerboas also have long hind legs, large ears, big eyes, and a very long, and frequently tufted tail. They look like a mammalian grasshopper, or something out of japanime. The long tail is particularly important because it helps the creature keep its balance and stability during flight.

You read that correctly. I wrote flight. We’ll circle back to that in a moment.

Most species of jerboas live in the desert. One of the most important issues facing diminutive desert denizens today is the prospect of becoming dinner for one of the less diminuative denizens. In the desert, this problem is exacerbated by the relative ease with which a predator can simply follow tracks and/or scent back to your burrow and then nom nom nom its way through you and your loved ones. If you cannot inspire fear and terror in your enemies, like the hamsters of yore, then you must find another way to survive. And several jerboa species have found a way.

Instead of walking up to the front doorstep of their burrows, leaving behind a trail any snack-seeking snack could follow, they pick spots several yards away to serve as their doorsteps. From these spots, using their enormous and powerful legs, they launch themselves into the air and, as gracefully as Guo Jingjing, follow a ballistic path that ends several inches inside their burrows (which are angled vertically in order to make this possible).

I have seen them doing this, and it’s nothing but net every time.

Of course, predators are not entirely dimwitted, and are perfectly capable of following a back trail, so the jerboas exit their burrows in exactly the same manner, often in rapid sequence. The burrow reminds one of a mouse-shooting submachine gun. During certain times of the day, when jerboas are both coming and going, the sky seems to be filled with them.

I was unable to find any clips on youtube of the creatures actually jumping. I’m not sure there would be much to see, anyway. They’re so small and so fast that they just sort of seem to dematerialize in one place and rematerialize a few yards away. But I did find some clips of this fellow, who some of you may find compelling:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hyApZROWWQ

So, what’s your favorite creature?

January 16, 2009

Your favorite burrowing animal

Filed under: General,Originally on TBD — DannyO @ 5:47 am

When I was in grade school, someone in the high school published an “underground” paper (a few mimeographed sheets of typewritten jokes, stories, and badly-drawn cartoons). It was far and away the funniest thing that I had seen up until that point in my life. The name of this paper, of which there was only one issue ever, was “La Mole”. And there was a little mole-like mascot drawn on the letterhead. It was wearing a stetson hat pulled low, and carrying a submachine gun.

I’ve always wanted to create my own underground newspaper to lampoon the surface world, but, well, you know. I don’t think I could ever equal La Mole. Safer not to try.

Early in my professional career, I met a researcher from MIT who told me the story of how the first hamsters were captured and “domesticated” for use as lab animals. Apparently, hamsters were known to be susceptible to a particular disease that humans get but other contemporary lab animals did not, thus making them an important weapon in the war against this disease — a testing vehicle for vaccines and the like, I suppose.

Now, you’d think that acquiring hamsters would just be a matter of going down to the local Hamster Hut and coming back with a few wriggling bags of merchandise, but this was back before the first hamsters had been captured. There were no pet hamsters. Only wild hamsters. And they were very, very wild. Pound for pound, more feared than badgers and more wily than rats. You can’t just dig a hamster out of its burrow. The burrows are too extensive, and hamsters can dig faster than you can. And they’re crafty. The only way to capture them was, apparently, to:

  1. locate a field rumored to contain hamsters
  2. dig a deep ditch around the field
  3. fill the ditch with traps or hamster-grabbing helpers
  4. excavate the rest of the field
  5. wait for the hamsters to make a run for it
  6. wearing huge gloves and gauntlets, scoop up the slowest ones

She gave me a copy of a paper describing the capture of the first hamsters, and I mean every word when I say that it would have made an excellent Indiana Jones movie. If moles are the Kim Philbys of the animal kingdom, hamsters are the Jason Bournes.

So, I have a special place in my heart for moles and hamsters. I also confess a small infatuation with voles, because the name is so fun to say. And, of course, rats, which make excellent pets and which my daughters adore.

What’s your favorite burrowing animal?

Go ahead; don’t be embarrassed if it’s a burrowing owl. We’re all friends here.

January 15, 2009

This day in history

Filed under: General,Originally on TBD — DannyO @ 5:53 am

You know the old joke: a bunch of junior mathematicians set out to discover the least interesting number. They work for a long time and eventually conclude that a certain number (whose name I won’t mention here — her name has been dragged through the mud too many times already) is the least interesting number in existence. Proud of their discovery, they take the result to their department chair. Without even looking up from his computer screen, where he’s been surfing on TBD all morning, he says: “Least interesting number, eh? Well, that’s a very interesting property.”

So even though it was many years ago yesterday (on January 14th) that singer David Jones made a pivotal career decision and changed his name to “David Bowie” in order to prevent further confusion between himself and Davy Jones, superstar member of the then insanely popular group “The Monkees”, I’m sure that there will be something equally droll and nearly newsworthy that happened on this day in history, unless it truly is the least interesting day of all, but I don’t know what that nugget of interestingness is yet–although I’m sure whatever you can dig up will be more interesting than what I have.

The frightening thing is that that isn’t even one of my longer sentences.

December 28, 2008

Snickerdoodles

Filed under: General,Originally on TBD — DannyO @ 5:55 am

Snickerdoodles are not hard to make, but there are some details that do not translate well into the modern era. I will do my best. Please forgive the detail in this recipe; when in doubt I will assume that you don’t know anything about baking.

Step 1: Mix together 1 cup soft shortening (at least half butter), 1.5 cups sugar, and two eggs. Soft shortening is any kind of shortening you have around, but in these days, that probably means butter. Crisco is a bit passe. Soft means that you’ve left it out on the counter until it reaches room temperature. If you microwave it, you are disqualified. Melted butter is not the same as softened butter. And don’t let thoughts of margarine cross your mind. Butter. Room temperature.

If the butter is not soft, it will take a little work to mix. Use a three-tined fork instead of spoon. In a few moments you will have a goopy substance. Resist the temptation to just eat it now. It will be tasty, but it will not be snickerdoodles.

Step 2: In a second bowl, sift together and mix 2.75 cups of flour, two teaspoons cream of tartar, one teaspoon baking soda, and 0.5 teaspoons of salt. If you don’t have a sifter (then you should get one if you’re serious about this), just mix them gently but completely for thirty seconds. Gently, or you will raise a cloud of flour. A fork works well for this, too. But not the same fork as before. That fork is gooey.

I always forget which is baking soda and which is baking powder (one comes in a box, usually, and the other in a can) so be careful. But maybe that’s just me.

Step 3: Gently pour the contents of the second bowl into the first bowl, and mix completely. Again, a fork is the right implement.

Step 4: You’ll notice I never told you to preheat the oven. I didn’t forget. It’s just not time yet. Snickerdoodles are refrigerator cookies. No kidding. You have to chill the dough before cooking.

Cover the bowl with something airtight or transfer it to a smaller container to minimize the amount of air in with the dough. Stick it in the fridge. Now wait several hours.

While you are waiting, mix into a shallow dish two tablespoons of granulated sugar and two teaspoons of cinnamon. You will need this later.

A small digression… The amount of flour necessary isn’t really 2.75 cups. That’s just an average. The precise amount depends on luck. The dough should be tacky, but not sticky. This is impossible to describe in words. It is part of the art. So back in part three, when you were mixing, you could add more flour if the mixture was too sticky. You can learn this only through practice.

Step 5: Several hours have passed. Preheat the oven to 400 F. Retrieve the dough from the fridge.

Using a spoon, dislodge a chunk of the dough about the size of a walnut (including shell). Roll in your hands (you washed them, right?) until it is round. Although the dough will be hard, it will soften in your hands. Then place the nascent cookie in the dish of sugar and cinnamon, rolling it around slightly so that one half of the cookie is encrusted with the mix. Then place on the cookie sheet, sugar side up. Cookies should be 2-3″ inches apart and the from the edge because they will spread quite a bit. Repeat until the sheet is filled.

An alternative is just to eat them raw. They are delicious this way.

Bake the cookies at 400 for 8-10 minutes. They will spread out and then start to get a sort of crinkly appearance on top. When they start to brown just *slightly* they are ready. (it is hard to tell when they begin to brown, because of the cinnamon, so an old trick is to leave one cookie, known as the canary, devoid of the sugar/cinnamon coating)

Do not overcook. Undercooking is better. As mentioned before, cooking them at all is entirely optional (if you’re OK with eating raw eggs).

Step 6: Remove from the oven. Pour a tall glass of milk. Patience, patience. The cookies will burn your mouth if you eat them too soon.

With a blunt spatula, try to remove the canary. If it smooshes up, it’s not ready. The cookies need to set (harden) slightly, which happens when they cool. If the top of your stove gets hot when the oven is on, place them somewhere else. The point is to let them cool. When they come off the sheet with just a bit of give, they’re ready. Maybe five minutes.

Step 7: Enjoy with cold milk. Repeat as necessary.

December 19, 2008

Your personal FAQ

Filed under: Funny Stuff,General,Originally on TBD — DannyO @ 9:07 am

Does your profile say everything about you that people need to know — or that you want them to know?

Mine does not. I keep getting questions, offers, etc, that could be handled with a few properly chosen words, if only I could properly choose them. So, as a public service, I’m going to post the answers here. I encourage you to do the same.

  1. Neither my avatar nor my screen name are not a character from the Simpsons. It’s a drawing of me, done in the style of the Simpsons. To get an avatar like mine, go to http://simpsonizeme.com/ and follow the directions. If I can do it, so can you.
  2. After consultation with all interested parties, I my informed opinion is that my penis is more than adequate, in both size and other operational parameters, to fill all current and projected requirements. I acknowledge your tireless and selfless efforts to prepare and present your unsolicited proposals for its improvement, but I am not interested in any of them. I will contact you if the situation changes.
  3. No, I will not fix your computer. Asking me to fix your computer is like asking Peter North or Jenna Jameson (depending on your preference in partners) to fix your marriage. It’s not going to turn out the way you hoped, even though your computer will have the time of its life and learn some enchanting new skills.
  4. I’m sure that sex with you would be delightful, but I am concerned about many of the longer-term consequences, so I’m afraid I must decline your kind and generous offer. I hope my refusal to boink you will not affect other aspects of our relationship.
  5. I’ll be back and post again when I damned well feel like it.

C’mon — what questions do you keep getting, or wish you kept getting, or imagined getting, or whatever, and what are your answers?

December 17, 2008

A question of deep social significance

Filed under: General,Originally on TBD — DannyO @ 6:00 am

With the temperature in much of the country hovering at just slightly above nothing, it might be a good time to reflect on one of the most important social issues of our generation. But first, I need to tell you something about myself…

Although I was raised in a traditional ice-cream household, as I’ve grown older I’ve learned to tolerate different points of view, or at least accept them with civility. I think it’s fine if people eat frozen yogurt, if that’s what makes them happy. It took me a long time to overcome my deep-seated feelings about gelato and sherbet, but when I found out that my daughter likes gelato, my heart melted. There’s nothing wrong with her.

I admit that I’m still not sure how I feel about shaved ice. It makes me squirm to think about it, and I have no desire to let any of it ever touch my lips, but I really can’t see any justifiable reason why people who like shaved ice shouldn’t be permitted to marry or serve in the military. They’re really not all that different from you and me, when you get right down to it. Not in any way that matters, anyway.

Frappes, shakes, awful-awfuls, and things of that ilk — they never really bothered me. I don’t have any tendencies, at least none that I know of, for such things, but given their constant mention in the popular media, they must appeal to someone. And their relationship to ice cream is obvious.

I will admit that I do have, well, slightly unusual desires of a different nature, however. I enjoy pumpkin ice cream, and blueberry ice cream is another one of my favorites, and I’ll admit I tried almost every flavor I could get my mouth around back in college. Usually I’m just a regular chocolate-chip-cookie-dough kind of guy, but in the early summer and autumn, I like something a little more exotic. And sometimes me and the missus have a sundae or a banana split, after the kids are asleep.

What about you? What kind of ice cream do you like, and how do you like it?

December 3, 2008

The hippopatamus suffocating in peanut butter…

Filed under: Funny Stuff,General,Originally on TBD — DannyO @ 6:10 pm

The not-quite rhythmic Click

The angry, startled, kazoo-playing pig…

The muddy boot extrication…

The buzz saw rolling by on a dessert cart (complete with Doppler effect)…

The sinus whistling wheeze of eternity…

The lip-flapping Flaugh…

The she-must-really-be-a-dude-to-make-that-sound…

OK, everyone snores once in a while. But some people only snore, while others transcend snoring and take snoring in bold, new directions.

Not every new type of snore deserves its own name, but some do. Memory-etching experiences must be named. It’s simply human nature.

Who snores in your household? And what do you call it?

December 1, 2008

I’m making a list

Filed under: General,Originally on TBD — DannyO @ 6:09 am


All the sales in the world aren’t going to change the fact that I don’t know what to get folks for Christmas yet. My wife hasn’t given me The List(tm) yet, for one thing.

Here’s how The List(tm) works. My wife makes a sort of “dear santa” list of all the things she wants. Then I go out and buy everything on the list, wrap it up, and give it to her.

This works because she’s reasonable about it. It’s not all that exorbitant — she knows where the money is really coming from — and I’m spared any sort of decision-making, which is all a man can ask.

My kids, who only have the most vague notion of money, have already prepared multi-paged single-spaced letters to santa. They started in May and have made several drafts. Last week, they were finally put in the mail. This is where I mention that the “American Girl” Doll Company is more evil that Halliburton, BlackWater, and Exxon put together.

I, unfortunately for all who love me, never make a Christmas list until the last possible moment, and then it mostly involves random post-its in the Eddie Bauer catalog. So, I invariably get a bunch of stuff I didn’t really want, because nobody knows what I want.

Well, everyone does know what I want, but having my way with Guo Jingjing on a water bed, on the beach, surrounded by plates of nachos while serenaded by a personal concert performed by The Faces isn’t terribly practical, so I don’t hold out much hope I’ll find that under the tree.

So, why don’t I get what I want? Perhaps it’s some sort of mild watered-down anhedonia mixed with the usual guy-philosophy of “If I want something, I’ll just buy it, rather than wait for someone else to buy it for me.”

So, what about you–do you have your lists ready? Do you know what you want, and do you know what to get everyone else?

Go ahead, twist the dagger. Tell me you’ve got it all figured out.

November 28, 2008

An embarrasment of pies

Filed under: General,Originally on TBD — DannyO @ 6:15 am

Thanksgiving is a holiday best suited for large families.

Usually the O family spends our Thanksgiving at my in-laws. Due to the disproportionate number of ministers in my family, we also tend to celebrate Christmas at Thanksgiving as well, and sometimes even my birthday gets thrown into the mix.

This year was unusual. My mother-in-law is battling an illness and didn’t feel up to hosting the festivities, and by the time this situation developed, it was too late to really plan much of anything else. So, it was just the four of us.

Four is a dangerously small number.

First, cooking TD for four takes only slightly less work than cooking TD for forty (which we have done–I know what I’m talking about). So my wife will probably be sleeping in until noon. Maybe noon today, maybe noon tomorrow. Probably around the time I finish cleaning all the pots and pans.

Second, due to the local ordinances that mandate a certain diversity among desserts, there were times yesterday when pies outnumbered humans in the household. We managed to level the playing field last night, and I inflicted heavy casualties on them this morning during a daring pre-dawn raid. (I slipped into their encampment, armed with only a dessert fork, while they were nestled in their aluminum foil beds. Some of them never even woke up.)

The turkey is no longer a threat to anyone. It has been reduced to broth. However, if the pies and the tubers (there are still mashed potatoes and sweet potatoes unaccounted for) form an alliance, it could be a long day.

Third, if there’s only four people at dinner, and two of them are tots, and the third doesn’t like red wine, but the fourth one opens a bottle anyway (the last of the 2007 Beaujolais Nouveau–the perfect wine for turkey!) then there will be bad jokes and silly things posted to blogs later.

Anyway, I hope you all have wonderful stories to tell, when you get back from stimulating the economy or whatever it is you’re doing this morning.

November 27, 2008

Reflections on the past year

Filed under: General,Originally on TBD — DannyO @ 6:18 am

OK, everyone has been chiming in about what they’re thankful about, etc, on a dozen threads here there and everywhere. I don’t feel like I have anything to add to the solid work done in this area by my peers who have already established threads on those topics (in some cases, jumping the gun by several weeks).

If you want to be thankful, go right ahead–we’re here for you.

And if you’re in a situation where you don’t feel that you have much of anything to be thankful about, we’re even more here for you. Seriously.

But if you’ve already been thankful elsewhere, no need to repeat yourself.

But I would like to reflect on something else, at least for a moment. I believe that this year is the inflection point of our culture. This is the year when millions of Americans saw the world in a new way. This is the year when the internet finally proved its worth.

This is the year when lolcats achieved ubiquity.

So, which lolcat is your favorite?

References:

November 23, 2008

Outsourcing your daydreams

Filed under: General,Originally on TBD — DannyO @ 6:05 pm

If you’re like me — and I don’t mean that as an insult — you’ve probably got two or three long-running daydreams or fantasies that you spend at least a little bit of time maintaining every day.

For example, I have a daydream about being a leader in my field of endeavor. I have a big office with a window and nice furniture and lighting, and spend my time developing clever strategies for developing more business and inventing clever solutions to long-standing problems. Because this is a daydream, issues of budgeting, staffing, and contract disputes never come up.

I also have a daydream about quiting my job and becoming a writer, and finally finishing my 1,400-page novel about life in second-century China. Then the novel is well-reviewed, people line up to buy book, and I am inspired to write more books, and become rich, famous, and respected. There might even be movies. Because this is a daydream, issues of advance money, budgeting, writers block, and contract disputes never come up.

And then there’s the most intricate and elaborate fantasy, which is the world described in the penultimate fantasy. The characters have taken on a life of their own, in some sense. I need to check in with them every so often, or they tend to wander off-script.

All this daydreaming takes time. Nothing is static. For example, when I’m rich and famous, what kind of cool car should I drive? There are always new cars, so the answer changes.

In one of my favorite books, Gravity’s Rainbow, there is a character, Pirate Prentice (no relation to Spuff, AFAIK) who has the unique gift of being able to take over and have other people’s daydreams. This is very handy in times of crisis — if you need the undivided attention of some cabinet member, for example, you can call in Pirate Prentice, and he’ll take care of maintaining his or her fantasy worlds for as long as necessary.

It’s an intriguing gift.

Anyone out there have any daydreams they’d like to outsource because they take up too much time? Let’s hear them. Maybe we all have the same dreams. Maybe we can amortize the work of maintaining them? Or at least we can steal each others good ideas…

November 22, 2008

Silly dreams

Filed under: Funny Stuff,General,Originally on TBD — DannyO @ 6:03 pm

I blame over-the-counter cold medicine.

You all know about my dreams, or at least you do if you were around for an earlier thread about dreams.

But when I’m tripping on Benadryl, things can get even odder. For example:

I’m driving in my car. An unidentified woman is in the passenger seat. Traffic is not moving. I’m very patient, but traffic is at a stand-still. I wonder where I’m going, or how late I’m going to be when I get there. The car in front of me hasn’t budged for a minute. On both sides of my car, other cars are also motionless. It isn’t just my lane. Nobody is moving. And yet, I am strangely calm.

My passenger speaks. “If you want to wait here, that’s fine. I’ll be back in a sec” she says, and without pausing or giving me an opportunity to say anything, opens her door, gets out, and walks away. (Safety-conscious readers please note that had this not been a dream, she would have had to have undone her seatbelt first — I insist on my passengers wearing them — but this detail is absent from the dream.)

I let her go. I don’t run after her, but I am very concerned. What if traffic starts to move? I can’t just wait here. If the car in front of me starts to move, I’ll have to go, or the people behind me will be upset. How is she going to find me again?

But traffic doesn’t move, and a few minutes later, she opens the car door and climbs back in.

I start to explain my concern and express my relief that traffic hadn’t moved, because otherwise I would have had to have left her, but she interrupts.

“Don’t be silly. We’re parked in a parking lot.

And we are.

And now comes the strange part. At this moment, I suddenly wake, leap from my bed, and run to my office, utterly convinced that this dream has deep meaning and must be immediately shared with all the denizens of the internet. And here we are.

So, what’cha got for me? Any interesting dreams lately? Anyone else “Riding the Green Sloth” (O slang for taking NyQuil…)?

p.s. I hope you don’t mind being referred to as denizens of the internet. I meant it in the best possible way.

November 7, 2008

The best band you’ve probably never heard of

Filed under: General,Originally on TBD — DannyO @ 5:56 pm

(It’s not a sentence, so I can end it with a preposition, right?)

Yesterday someone asked whether I had a song lodged in my head. And a few days ago someone asked what I would do if I had access to a time machine. It turns out that the two answers are related. I’d go back to 1973 or 1974 and watch The Faces perform live. (well, first I’d save the world and pile up enormous wealth, but if the time machine still had anything left in the tank, 1974 would be my next stop)

The Faces are the best group nobody seems to know. (I’m sure this well-versed and erudite crowd will contain many exceptions, but on average, they’re pretty obscure.) But everyone knows the members:

  • Rod Stewart (’nuff said)
  • Ronnie Wood (carried the Rolling Stones later)
  • Ronnie Lane (longtime Pete Townsend collaborator)
  • Kenney Jones (took over Keith Moon’s job for The Who)
  • Ian McLagan (session keyboardist par excellence, and, oddly enough, second husband to Keith Moon’s widow).

You can hardly turn on the radio without hearing these folks, but you rarely hear The Faces (and often when you do, they are mis-introduced as Rod Stewart).

They were probably doomed to obscurity because they were a concert band first and foremost, and somewhat underproduced. It was obvious to the audience that the band was having a great time up on stage (in a professional way) and that the audience was welcome to come along. No deep, angst-filled lyrics, just love songs and boogie-woogie.

Go ahead and see for yourself. Turn it up. Start around 6:00 if you want to skip the slow stuff and get rocking. Watch Ronnie Wood (in the red pants) grab the reins at 6:25. By 6:50, if you’re not playing air guitar, well, I don’t really know what to say. If you play this all the way through, this lick will be in your head all day.

Anyway, enough about me.

What groups/performers do you love, and can’t figure out why nobody else seems to have heard of them?

October 30, 2008

My vegetable love

Filed under: General,Originally on TBD — DannyO @ 6:30 am

“… My vegetable love should grow
Vaster than empires, and more slow.”

Thanks to a bit of wind last night, Andrew Marvell’s metaphor for love seems to have settled in my back yard. It’s going to take some serious rake time to resolve the situation satisfactorily.

“… But at my back I always hear
Time’s winged chariot hurrying near”

And now it’s time to rouse the kids from their slumber. An easy task, today — all I need to do is remind them that tomorrow is Halloween, and they spring to life like a time-lapse movie of a flower opening.

“… Thus, though we cannot make our sun
Stand still, yet we will make him run.”

Yep, a day of running for me. Another trip to the dentist to address the fallout from the Flying Gold Crown episode last weekend, plus the usual dozen or so things more than I can possibly accomplish.

And now, and I thank you for your patience, we finally reach the part of the discussion introduction when I actually reveal the theme, which today will happen in a slap-dash, unedited and off-the-cuff manner. And it’s not even a very good theme, but I’m sure you’ll do me proud anyway.

What poems or other works of literature that you memorized or otherwise internalized in High School are still rattling around in your head, and surface from time to time?

The Odyssey? The Bible? A few Shakespeare sonnets? Something by T.S. Eliot? George Eliot? Eliot Gould? Are you a Herodotus guy, or a Tacitus gal? None of the above?

Me, it’s just bits and pieces. Time’s winged chariot just keeps popping up.

October 29, 2008

Roy Orbison singing for the lonely

Filed under: General,Originally on TBD — DannyO @ 5:44 pm

Roy Orbison’s singin’ for the lonely
Hey that’s me, and I want you only
Don’t turn me home again
I just can’t face myself alone again…

At this point in our music-themed discussions, we have reached a level of openness, honesty and mutual respect that allows us to really dig into our deepest feelings. Simple subjective questions (“Sinatra or Martin?” or “Van Halen — before or after David Lee Roth?” or “Yoko Ono — crime against humanity, or victim of circumstance?”) can now be faced without fear, and scarcely merit discussion.

So now we’re ready for the deep stuff. Or if we’re not, I hope you brought your asbestos undergarments, because we’re going to take the plunge anyway. Take a deep breath…

Which Bruce Springsteen album/era speaks to you?

Did “Born in the USA” begin your awareness of Bruce, or was that when the poetry left his lyrics and he sold out to the mass market? Do you think Nebraska is good, bad, or forgettable? Can you find Asbury Park on a map? Did that fire ever burn in your veins?

Personally, I believe that simply composing “Thunder Road” and/or “Open All Night” are sufficient grounds for immediate induction into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, and the fact that the same dude also wrote both and “Rosalita” and “For You” simply boggles the mind and makes me appreciate just what humans can accomplish.

And remember, in these times of turmoil and general assholery, when you’re asking yourself “What we can do now?”, remember that we have a chance to make it good somehow, and perhaps the answer is as simple as roll down the window and let the wind blow back your hair…

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress