Words of Danny O'Bigbelly My idea of a good time

February 25, 2009

The problem with everything

Filed under: General — DannyO @ 8:11 pm

I work in an scientific discipline closely related to engineering.  This means that I am expected, in the course of my research, to actually build things.  I create artifacts, but things that tangible, not just a set of equations or a theory.  (of course the sets of equations and theories are the lofty goals of my work, but in order to get there, apparatus needs to be built, experiments run, etc)

This is the problem with everything.  Not just my work, but huge swaths of the current world.

It used to be possible for two guys to change the world by building something, over the course of a few weeks or months, in their garage, on a shoe-string budget.  This is becoming increasingly difficult, and in my field, it may be virtually impossible at this point.

When I was starting out, I could take ideas from conception to delivery.  One person could do it all.  This is no longer possible; it takes a team of people years of work and bags of money to produce a new product that is just an incremental improvement over the current state of the art.  It hardly seems worth the effort, and that’s the crisis.

The amount of time and energy it takes to build new things in my field has surpassed the limits of sustainable enthusiasm.  It takes so much time, effort, and sacrifice to make a difference that it’s hard to summon the passion necessary to make the commitment.  In short, the fun is gone.

February 24, 2009

Focus and limits

Filed under: Uncategorized — DannyO @ 9:45 am

A friend of mine has a blog that has an interesting twist; the blog entries are stories limited to 250 words.  It makes for some interesting reading, because she knows how to get the job done within that budget.

This isn’t a new idea (I’ve seen several variations on the idea) and I’ve even played along myself, trying to write a story using only six sentences.  It was fun, but I confess that I needed to bend the rules (or at least, I felt I violated the spirit of the rules) by abusing punctuation and sentence construction a bit.  Some people seemed to enjoy the result, however, although perhaps enjoy isn’t the right word.  It’s a sad story.

I’ve also participated in games involving writing haiku that include a certain set of words, or address a certain theme, or something along those lines.  Since the structure of a haiku is rigid, there are very few decisions to be made or distractions to conquer about form or meter, which actually makes things much easier in some ways.

But the idea popped into my head that there might be different sorts of limits or restrictions to writing that one could attempt to explore. Instead of a word or sentence limit, or an even more constrained verse form, perhaps it would be possible to ignore structure and attempt to limit some of the other fundamental building blocks of narrative prose.

For example, could I write a short story that did not use any similes or metaphors?  (Immediately an argument would spring up about what constitutes a metaphor; when we use a non-specific word such as “food” or “eating” are we invoking the ideals for “food” and “eating” and applying them as metaphors?  Perhaps there is some way to split this hair with an adequate definition of metaphor, but I don’t usually like playing games with rules I can barely understand)

As another example, could I write a story with a completely linear structure?  Again, I’m not sure what I’m talking about when I say the words “linear structure”, so I’ll have to try to be more careful.  What I mean is a story that leads with no twists and turns.  It is as predictable as a roller-coaster, following an utterly predictable course but interesting (or even thrilling) nonetheless?  Great writers can do this; I can reread Wodehouse until I’ve got pages on end nearly memorized, but I still enjoy the ride.  Like listening to familiar music, things do not have to be surprising, novel, or unexpected in order to be enjoyable, but I do not usually write in this way.  I write jokes.  There’s almost always a twist at the end, and that’s the amusing part.  What if I disallowed the surprise twist?

Could I write a story that was simply a naked conversation?  No clues as to the speakers identities except what they provide, in an uncontrived way, as part of the conversation?  No “he said, rubbing his freshly-slapped face” or “she shouted, her lips twisted in rage”, but just the words, without annotation or adornment, and, most importantly, without artifice.  It’s been done, but can I manage it?

Maybe I should take some baby steps first.

February 20, 2009

Gouts of blood

Filed under: General,Originally on TBD — DannyO @ 6:38 am

You might think that after thirty years of shaving, I would have learned how to avoid nicking that little spot under my nose, the spot where most of the blood in my body apparently congregates when it has nothing better to do.

It would be reasonable to think that. Nobody would fault your mind for harboring such a thought.

But you would be wrong.

February 8, 2009

Gotcha!

Filed under: General,Originally on TBD — DannyO @ 6:15 pm

Several years ago, when my wife and I were visiting China, doing some touristy stuff, and traveling to one of the more out-of-the-way cities, we were lounging in our hotel room when we were unexpectedly roused from our groggy jet-lagged daze by a soft knock on the door. I opened the door, and a young woman I’d never seen before and whose name I was never able to learn gently handed me an infant girl and a small envelope of papers. And then, before we could fully grasp what was happening, she was gone. I don’t think we ever saw her again.

The infant was dressed in several layers of clothing–all her worldly possessions, it turned out. She was perspiring from wearing so many clothes and appeared unhappy and confused. There was no question that she was somewhat ill. There was also no question that we were a little bit unprepared for this.

But not completely unprepared. We’d been waiting for this day for a very long time. All the paperwork had been done and all the forms had been filed. We had diapers, wipes, formula, new clothing, an assortment of toys, medicines, remedies, and gadgets. We’d read the books. We had a lot of facts. But this was reality. It tastes and smells a lot different.

The day the baby is given to his or her “forever family” is called “Gotcha Day.” I’m not sure who is the subject and who is the object of that gotcha. There are convincing arguments for several different interpretations.

How did having children change things for you?

If you don’t have any children, perhaps you know people who do, or remember stories from your parents about how you changed their lives.

February 2, 2009

What are they thinking?

Filed under: General,Originally on TBD — DannyO @ 6:17 pm

They had been orbiting above the wreckage for fifteen minutes but had seen no sign of life. They had watched as Broderick Weltswell, crippled with wing problems, had attempted an unpowered emergency landing on the short ribbon of thin flat road below, only to be hit twice more as he glided in. They had watched helplessly as the uniformed enemy cautiously but inexorably approached the wreckage.

Reginald Thipset, flight leader, didn’t believe that Broderick was still alive. Three thoughts flitted through his mind: he would never see Broderick again; he was going to have to write very painful letter upon return to base; and that the return to base was becoming more perilous by the moment.

The sky flared red in the west, but gloom was gathering in the east, the direction home. The night sky was not safe. “Just once,” thought Reginald, “I’d like to be able to enjoy a sunset instead of turning away and fleeing.”

His revere was broken by a sudden squack over the flight channel from his wingman. “Sir, there’s nothing we can do here. The sun is setting. We need to leave now.”

Reginald considered his dwindling options and made a difficult choice. There was no time to take the approved route. “Form up and follow me. We’re going down on the deck. We’re taking a shortcut through the hills.”

There was no protest. His flight trusted him. Good.

The flight followed Reginald through the hills, following the terrain, so low they were often flying between the trees. Reginald saw the startled faces of children playing in a yard of a small house turn and follow him as flew past. It was a reminder that they were flying within easy small arms range of hundreds of the enemy, but he knew that they had little to fear. Flying this low, through the wooded hills, meant that the chance of anyone even getting off a shot was negligible. Reginald had never heard of it happening. Not here. But they’d be over the flats soon.

Reginald didn’t flinch as his threat detector screamed a warning. They were passing over an old “Big Eye” site. It always made the threat detector go off, but Reginald and his flight knew that it just a beacon, left behind like a scarecrow, to frighten anyone flying overhead. Whoever was operating the site had never sent anything up after them, but being watched so intently, even by impotent eyes, still sent a chill down Reginald’s back. But at the same time it comforted Reginald to pass it by, because it was a landmark on the way home.

Then they were over the flats, an immense alluvial plane that had been cleared of nearly all trees by generations of farmers. Flat and featureless, with no vegetation taller than a stalk of rice, it was the last barrier. Flying low through the hills had kept them safe, but flying low here was dangerous. They were exposed here, horizon to horizon. There were stories about entire flights decimated in the blink of an eye over the flats.

“Feet wet in forty seconds,” announced Reginald to the flight, trying to sound reassuring. Over the water they’d be safe. The seconds ticked by. Reginald realized he was holding his breath. He could see the shore, and then it was behind them.

The sky behind them was fading to ochre and the water looked black beneath them. They were over the water. Reginald relaxed. In a few moments, they set down, rejoining the rest of the flock paddling around Fresh Pond in Cambridge. It was just another day in the life of a Canadian Goose.

What do you think animals think about?

February 1, 2009

A word of advice

Filed under: General — DannyO @ 8:59 am

The internet is populated by many frauds and charlatans.  This is a well-established fact.  Therefore, I’m not going to give you any information here about myself.  Instead, I’m going to give you some advice.

Ignore any and all of the information offered to you directly and without solicitation, and don’t solicit information from strangers unless you have a way to verify the integrity of the information by a separate mechanism.  When an anonymous stranger writes information in his or her blog or web site, there is little hope that you will ever know whether that information is factual, an exaggeration, a joke, or a deliberate and calculated attempt to deceive.  That doesn’t mean that it’s a lie, or that it’s incorrect, or any of those things.  But a wise person should be aware that it might be.

The one thing that is true–but unfortunately it’s not a simple truth–is that you can tell a lot about a person not so much by what they write but what he or she chooses to write about and how he or she expresses his or her thoughts.   For example, I could mention that I’m a curmudgeonly, forty-something, overweight guy.  I might be telling a complete lie–I might actually be a sweet, beautiful nineteen-year-old girl with nothing but romance on her mind (although this would be the opposite of the way things usually work, from what I’ve heard).  You don’t know.  You might never know.  But two things you do know are that I want you to think of me as a curmudgeonly middle-aged guy, and that somewhere I picked up the word curmudgeon and thought this would be a good time to show it off.

I grant you that this probably isn’t very useful information, but it’s 100% accurate.  So just preface all my statements with “The author wants me to believe that” and you’ll be OK.

Of course, I might just want you to think that I’m giving you good advice, while in fact the advice is terrible.  You’re going to have to figure that out for yourself.

Now we get to the complicated bit.  While you are worrying about me being a fraud and/or charlatan, I also have some doubts about you.  I’m sorry, but since the door is always open on my blog, I don’t really know who is going to come wandering in, and therefore I must be somewhat on my guard.  Some of you are simply anonymous strangers–or, as I like to say, anonymous, faceless friends I haven’t met yet and probably never will outside of cyberspace.  Some of you are actual friends from the real world, or both the real world and cyberspace.  The better you know me, the easiest it will be to tell when I’m lying or distorting the truth.

I’m planning to lie or distort the truth quite frequently on this blog, but only in very specific ways, primarily in order to protect the particulars of my identity, and personal information of myself, my family and relatives, and loved ones.  For example, if I make a blog entry telling the story of some shenanigans that my daughter and her best friend Helen had as they walked down Sherman Street on their way to school, you can be sure of two things–the name of my daughters best friend is not Helen, and she doesn’t walk down Sherman Street on her way to school.  Perhaps I don’t even have a grade-school-aged daughter at all, although it would be profoundly strange for me to write so many blog entries about an entirely fictional character.

I may also exaggerate or distort the details of some events in order to increase the entertainment value of a story.  For example, it simply sounds more interesting and literary to say that my wife’s snoring sounds like an unmuffled, rusty chainsaw being used to cut through a jersey barrier during a thunderstorm, when in reality her snoring more accurately resembles the sound of a well-maintained chainsaw being used to clear-cut a forest of young, supple pine trees on a sunny spring day.  Perhaps the tendency to embellish and tweak simply runs in my family; for example, the stories my mother tells about me as a baby keep getting more and more interesting (and embarrassing) with each passing year.  When I was a teenager my mother used to tell my prospective girlfriends that once I ate a dog biscuit (because all evidence suggested that the culinary tastes of our dog and my personal tastes were highly congruent, and therefore something so immensely enjoyed by the dog must be worth a try), but now, some three decades later, the story has grown in richness and my wife has been informed that dog food was my staple food as a boy.  In any case, I consider this sort of fibbing as an element of poetic license, so you might as well get used to it.

A third situation that leads to the appearance of lying is that sometimes I simply get the facts wrong, in which case I don’t even know that I’m lying.

If you catch me intentionally lying, or accidentally telling the truth, I would appreciate it if you just kept it to yourself.

Powered by WordPress